2023年12月24日发(作者:生活是美好的)
A Negotiation On
Commercial Properties
Investment
Module Code: MBAM951
Module Name: Negotiation
Candidate Number: 063146
Word Count: 1500 words
Page numbers: 5
CONTENT
i.
ii.
Introduction
Context
• Participants
• The background
• Pre-work
iii. The Six Meetings
• The first meeting
• Anchored at the cond and third visit
• Unexpected risks appeared at the fourth meeting and struggled at the fifth
• The final deal at the sixth meeting
iv.
v.
Inspection and Recommendation
References
i.
Introduction
As said, negotiation exits in our daily life if we think it carefully, in other word, not
only we ourlves are manipulated by others to some extent but we do the same
to others. This essay will describe a business negotiation from a personal
dimension pinpointing negotiation perspective.
The story is mainly about me and my manager attracting a fund manager to invest
in our commercial plateau eco-community, and will be told chronologically.
The whole negotiation is an integrative approach becau we share the final goal,
which is to maximize the value for both sides. [1]Whereas we were at risk of losing
him to other competitors or investment sources, I and my manager ud a sort of
tactics to nudge him bad on analysis and predictions on his and his wife’s
personalities. Although we ignored some underlying risks during the process which
almost led us to failure, fortunately, the problems were tackled due to objective
factors and our dynamic and responsive solutions. Thus, this negotiation ended up
with me and my manager’s getting this investment.
Overall, the outcome is satisfying. However, we did make some mistakes during
the process, such as personal emotions involved, lack of consideration of other
stakeholders and underestimated exchangeable factors, which parts can be
improved by applying negotiation frameworks.
ii.
• Participants
The company: Hong Kong Land Holdings Ltd. Chongqing Company (HKL), a
member of Jardine Matheson group, has a good reputation on prime office and
luxury retail property management as well as sustainable development in Asia but
not tested in the local market of Chongqing. My manager and I reprent this
company to negotiate with potential clients, investors and brand partners.
Potential investor: Mr. Yang, a futures trader with more than 1.5 million pounds
cash, in his 30s and married his classmate in college with a 6-year old boy, living
in a high-profile villa at outskirts of the city with parents (the way shows your filial
piety in China), very lucid-minded and nsitive about negotiation routines
developed in sophisticated work environment.
Context
• The background
HKL was developing an eco-community consists of a residence, shopping mall,
fitness centre, parks, subway station, primary school, community clinic, and so
forth, which are all designed bad on environmentally sustainable thinking. The
mode of the investment is to attract investors to buy the properties first, then sign
a contract with the company to authorize them to manage it. Mr Yang heard about
this project from a friend right after he discusd with his wife about the high risks
of futures trading and thought putting money on long-term physical properties is a
relatively low return but stable and cured investment, which fits his prent
needs. Therefore, he rearched on this project and developed a considerable
comprehension. After a few phone calls, we t up our first meet.
• Pre-work
Before the first meeting, given he is a straightforward man who hates people
tempting or testing, me and my manager did some analysis and hypothesis bad
on his personal information.
First, his high-risk job gave him a n of risk aversion and nsitivity of
negotiation tactics, so we need to u an authentic attitude and well-phad
nudges to consolidate his confidence and thus cure the deal.
Secondly, the residence where he lives is in a relatively remote and 10-year old
but well-established community, which is an indication of his preference of quiet
but a high-quality lifestyle (facilities and convenience) and good rvice.
Lastly, his family structure and his handling of parental relationships show that he
values his family and family members significantly. We are to take some of his
families’ living scenes into account to influence his decision and t this as the key
part to penetrate when the situation reaches an impas.
We identified his options and possible BATNA as well as the ZOPA, then decided
to drop the comparison of numbers, instead, try to stand out by stressing the added
value behind our brand (reliable, profitable and thoughtful), concept (eco-community and sustainable) and implementation (faithful and responsive).[2]
iii.
• The first meeting
The Six Meetings
The first meeting was a conversation between just me with Mr Yang and his wife,
the manager plays the power that I will resort to. Instead of starting the business
talk right away, we decided to make the first meeting for three goals: Using
conditional language to give them autonomy; Develop a chance to establish a
personal relationship with them; Validate their predicted BATNA and ZOPA. As our
plan, the first meeting went well and we built up a very good understanding and
explicit atmosphere although they showed up 30mins late than expected becau
of the traffic jam when they took their son to the school in the city centre.
• Anchored at the cond and third visit
On the next visit, he tried twice to get dominance of the talk, the first one was
postponing the meeting to the next day, the cond one was he trying to t the
topic of the cond meeting as discussing some preconditions, which in
negotiation theory are attempting to control the agenda and declaring some issues
are non-negotiable. This means he was engaged on this project, what we need to
do is maximizing the amount of this investment and bringing in his resources.
To make it professional and equal which will facilitate our way to get dominance,
we didn’t rush to t up the cond meeting, instead, called him one day after he
claimed his proposal to confirm the appointment on next visit. It’s a tactic to soften
his attitude by making him wait but without upright refusing or disagreeing.
With the attitude nudge and relationship establishment, I anchored by tting a few
gains on the cond meeting, such as location, the expected cost, the facilities and
the rvices provided in the future. The price and expected return I ud his risk
aversion to emphasize our certainties comparing to competitors’ possibilities.
During the whole process, I intentionally mentioned my manager for a couple of
times on some key points to establish his image as a powerful decision maker. At
the third meeting, I officially introduced my manager, then he played a bad cop to
deliberately reviewed a few agreements we achieved previously, which is nibbling
in negotiation theory, when a deal is done, go back for just a little bit more.
• Unexpected risks appeared at the fourth meeting and struggled at the fifth
We thought the deal would be done at the fourth or fifth meeting, but a new
stakeholder showed up which we did not consider, his parents. The properties still
need to be taken care of by someone, which turned out to be his parents, but they
did not want to spend much time on commuting back and forth due to the place is
40 minutes away from their home and they can not drive. Although we were worried
about the deal, we cho to listen rather than trying to convince them right away.
• The final deal at the sixth meeting
Then I and my manager analyzed the whole situation, which is he apparently
wanting this project but he values his parents’ opinions. After discussion, we made
a bold decision, suggesting them to move to our community. There were three
thoughts behind this decision:
Firstly, the problem of his parents taking care of the business would be solved;
Secondly, he and his wife were struggling with nding their child to school as well
as fetching up. Therefore, our community having one of the best schools is a
solution for them;
Thirdly and lastly, there are no many public means of transport due to the location
of their old hou, if they moved to our community, they can u the subway to
travel to places, which will also save the young couple much time and energy.
Finally, eight weeks after his first visit, on the sixth meeting, he thought it is a great
idea and accepted it, we signed up the contract after a few hours of discussion
about details.
iv.
• Inspection
The whole process had twists and turns, but the outcome was good, what I and
my manager did right in terms of negotiation framework:
Firstly, we pre-worked and developed a good understanding of the BATNA and
ZOPA of both sides, then estimated his options and possible risks and identified
differentiation tactics.
Secondly, we established affiliation and mutual understanding and respect: we
were active listening and had been respecting their interests, additionally, ud
conditional language to ensure their autonomy.[3]
Thirdly, tactics and ploys ud subtly and effectively, such as risk aversion,[4] bad
cop(my manager)/ good cop(me), character consistency: I played the professional
but thoughtful mediator between both sides who promote the phas of the deal
and my manager played the dignified decision maker who anchors at significant
points, and we successfully immerd ourlves in the characters the entire
negotiation process.[5]
• Recommendation
Inspection and recommendation
Stakeholders
If we considered the risk of Mr Yang’s parents and propod the corresponding
solutions in the first place, the deal could be established at least one week less. In
addition, the possibility of failure on this deal will be reduced significantly.[6]
Ask good questions
We were active listening but did not ask enough questions to interact, for example,
about his wife’s work and position and their family members’ hobbies, the
personal questions could enhance our trust and we could ek other determining
factors for Mr Yang.[7]
Orientation and Volume
I and my manager kept calm and immerd in our characters the entire time, even
when he was dominant or using complaining to shape us and eking for a better
offer, which part we can apply orientation and volume to declare our position.[8]
Positive utilization of Emotions
Although I established a good personal relationship with Mr Yang and his wife
which helped smooth the whole negotiation, I was exploited becau of personal
emotion involvement and did not utilize it in Mr Yang’s family relationship, such as
using our own parents’ everyday concerns and children’s education to resonant
him.[9]
v. References
[1] Crawford, W. (2019, February 21). Negotiation. Lecture prented at
Integrative versus Distributive bargaining? EXETER.
[2] Crawford, W. (2019, February 21). Negotiation. Lecture prented at
Preparation, EXETER.
[3] Crawford, W. (2019, February 21). Negotiation. Lecture prented at
AFFILIATION, EXETER.
[4] Crawford, W. (2019, February 21). Negotiation. Lecture prented at
Kahneman’s Fourfold Pattern, EXETER.
[5] Crawford, W. (2019, February 21). Negotiation. Lecture prented at ROLE,
EXETER.
[6] Crawford, W. (2019, February 21). Negotiation. Lecture prented at
AFFILIATION, EXETER.
[7] Crawford, W. (2019, February 21). Negotiation. Lecture prented at
APPRECIATION, EXETER.
[8] Shell, GR. and Moussa, M., 2008. The Art of Woo, Chichester, Wiley
[9] Shapiro, D., Fisher, R. (2007). Building Agreement: Using Emotions as You
Negotiate. Cornerstone, London.
本文发布于:2023-12-24 09:27:41,感谢您对本站的认可!
本文链接:https://www.wtabcd.cn/zhishi/a/1703381261249755.html
版权声明:本站内容均来自互联网,仅供演示用,请勿用于商业和其他非法用途。如果侵犯了您的权益请与我们联系,我们将在24小时内删除。
本文word下载地址:Negotiation.doc
本文 PDF 下载地址:Negotiation.pdf
留言与评论(共有 0 条评论) |