河北大学
硕士学位论文
“空白”与意义未定性理论辨析
姓名：***
申请学位级别：硕士
专业：文艺学
指导教师：***
2011-05
摘 要
伊瑟尔从微观的阅读活动出发，把个人的阅读行为作为研究对象，认为阅读活动是读者和本文之间动态的相互作用的过程。在此基础上他提出了“空白”与“意义未定性”理论，认为读者在阅读过程中文本中会产生许多“空白”，即“不确定点”，读者只有不断地填补“空白”，才能完成整个阅读“体验”过程，而且他认为
每个读者阅读同一部文本时的“体验”都是不同的，即使同一个读者在不同时刻阅读同一部文本的“体验”也是不同的，从这个角度来看，伊瑟尔所提出的“意义”是“未定性”的。但是，本文认为个体读者肯定是处在一定历史和社会关系中的读者，他不得不受到整个历史和社会因素的影响。而且作品的“意义”并不是由某一个读者的“体验”所决定，个体读者的“体验”只能算作“意味”，而“意义”是个体读者所处的社会在接受过程中产生的。本文就是要把个体读者放在整个宏观的社会背景下，在历时和共时的维度来讨论“意义”的生成是否具有“未定性”。从历时的角度来看，“意义”是具有“未定性”的，但我们不可能站在“过去”中去评价作品，只能从一个“共时的横断面”中去评价作品。在这个共时的横断面中，整个社会的“文化心理结构”是相似的，而且作为文本和读者之间的交流工具——“语言符号”也是由共时横断面的社会“约定俗成”的，所以“意义”在共时的横断面上不具有“未定性”。
关键词空白意义语言未定性阅读接受
Abstract
Ir from microcosmic act of reading, bad on the personal act of reading as the rearch object, thinks that act of reading is between readers and this dynamic interaction process. On this basis he put forward "blank" and "meaning not qualitative" theory that readers in the reading process in the Chine language will produce many of the "blank", namely "dot", readers uncertain only by continuo
usly fill "blank", can complete the whole process of reading "experience", and he thinks that every reader of the same text "experience" is different, even the same readers in different time reading the same text "experience" is also different, from this perspective, the Ir propod "means" is " indeterminacy ". However, this paper argues that the individual readers must be in a certain historical and social relations, and he had the readers by the whole history and social influences. And the "meaning" works by a reader is not determined by the "experience", the readers' "experience" can only be considered as "means" and "means" is its social readers in accept produces in the process. This paper is to the individual reader in the entire macroscopic social background, in the synchronic and diachronic dimension to the discussion of whether the "meaning" has indeterminacy. From diachronic perspective, "meaning" is " indeterminacy ", but we can't stand in the past, only to evaluate from a "works cross-ctional" synchronic to evaluation works. In this synchronic cross-ctional and the whole society's "cultural psychological structure" is similar, but also as a text and between the readers tool of communication —"language symbols is the synchronic cross-ctional society", so the conventional "in" meaning "with the cross ction does not have" indeterminacy ".
Keywords blank meaning language indeterminacy reading reception
