道德的中英文对照议论文
Moral abduction[æb'dʌkʃn]:is a kind of behavior which u the moral as an excu to force individuals or groups to do something nominal good or measure ordinary people with the saint's standards by making moral an obligation. For example, if someone refus to be a brave citizen in danger time, then he will be condemned; if someone is suppod to support the Hope Project but he didn’t, then he will be condemned, both of the phenomenon are moral abduction, although they asked for good aim, becau this is not anyone’s duty to be lf-sacrifice. "Moral" itlf does not have property of "obligation", "moral obligation" is a logical error and should not exist. It’s unfair to be criticized for being stingy just becau you change your Wi-Fi password to stop your neighbor sharing it without your agreement. ,
杭州新东方英语学校道德：以道德为砝码，要挟个人或众人不得不做某些事情，用圣人的标准要求普通人，用美德来要求道德义务。比如，要求一个人舍身救人，否则就要谴责，这就是道德；要求一个人掏钱支持希望工程，这尽管是一件好事，但如果一个人不掏就要谴责，这也是道德，因为这并非他的义务。因为“道德”本身并不存在“义务”属性，“道德义务”一词犯了逻辑上的错误，本身不应存在。
Perhaps you have heard this joke: There was a man who had insisted on giving 10 dollars to a beggar per day for two years. Then one day he gave the beggar 5 yuan. The beggar asked him, why so little? He said, I was single before, so I can give you ten , but now I have got married, I have to support my wife. So I can only give you five yuan. After listening to the man, the beggar became very angry and said: how could you take my money to support your wife !
unamud
大家或许听过照这个笑话：有个人每天给门外一个乞丐10元钱就这样坚持了两年。后来一天他给了乞丐5元。乞丐就问他，怎么这么少？他就说，之前我是单身，所以能给你十块，现在我有老婆了，我还要养活我老婆。就只能给你五块了，乞丐听了后大怒，给了那人一个耳光说：你怎么可以拿我的钱养你的老婆呢！
The reality is not less ridiculous. Some internet urs had demonstrated spontaneously for calling for donations from a local lottery winner to save lives. But in fact China's first "Lottery Regulations" clearly states: "Any unit or individual for any reason cannot violate the winner’ will,mr right or persuade, inducement, coercion the winners to donate winnings." The
winner has paid his tax and made a contribution to society. Furthermore, donations should be voluntary, but "asked donations" is forced. And if this kind of forcing commit keep going unregulated, it will be an awful social practice. 六一串词
specialenglish初中试题曾有网友在投注点门口打出求助横幅，呼吁当地刚中了1200万元的大奖得主捐资救人。但实际上我国首部《彩票管理条例》中明确规定：“任何单位和个人不得违背中奖者本人意愿，以任何理由和方式劝导、、强迫中奖者捐赠中奖奖金。”中奖者已经缴税了，对社会作了贡献。且任何人捐款都应是自愿的，而“索捐”带有强迫色彩。这次是强迫一个人去捐，以后就会形成一种社会惯例。
英语三级考试答案
胖女孩穿衣搭配Some rich public characters become the main target of moral abduction. Fan Bingbing had refud to join the pro-poor activities, then many newspapers reprinted to attack her heartless. On some international Top Marques, the rich spent money lavishly, thus public medias accud the rich of preferring to squander rather than donate and take the responsibility for the community. The media over reported the private ctor behavior, and to bring tho individuals reported the pressure that they should not bear. Public figur
es should to tolerate some certain obligations, but should they give up their right to privacy completely? Sympathy for the weak can not become the excu to slander others, from the perspective of property rights, the stars and the rich are cl免费中英文在线翻译early have the right to dispo their property freely as long as legal.
一些明星和富翁成了道德的主要目标。范冰冰拒绝加入扶贫活动，不少地方报纸相继转载，攻击明星为富不仁。在一些国际顶级私人物品展上，富豪们出手相当阔绰,公众媒体纷纷指责，富豪宁可挥霍不愿捐赠，不愿为社会多承担责任。媒体对私人领域过度公开的报道行为，并给被报道的个体带来他们本不应该承受的压力。公众人物应当行使一定的容忍义务，但容忍就要彻底放弃自己的隐私权吗？！对弱者的同情不能成为诽谤别人的借口，从财产权的角度来说，明星富豪们显然具有自由在合法范围内处置自己财产的权利。
village什么意思
Respecting the old and caring for the young is a basic ethical framework and code of conduct of human society. July 2008, Zhengzhou City ruled that pasngers should take the initiative to make way for the elderly, pregnant women and other special pasngers, or el the driver and conductor can drive them out , and the urban public transport admi
nistrative departments can also fine the pasngers. Then many people show their objections. The spirit and intention of this legislation are laudable, but the means are wrong and can only lead to embarrassing end. Using regulations to abducted moral is even wor, it is a blatant violence to men’s freewill. Such regulations not only violated the spirit of the modern rule of law, but also is a backsliding of modern civilization. It wouldn’t’t solve social conflicts, but incread new social confrontation and increa people's rentment reasonless: I should have the freedom of choice, Why should I subject to regulations’ threats and intimidation?
尊老爱幼，乃人类社会基本的伦理框架和行为准则。2008年7月，郑州市规定，乘客应主动让位给老人、孕妇等特殊乘客。不履行义务，驾驶员、售票员可以拒绝其乘坐，城市公共交通行政主管部门还可以对乘客处以50元罚款。很多市民听说后提出了异议。
这种立法精神和初衷，值得赞许，但是手段错误，只会尴尬收场。用法规来道德，比单纯的道德性质上更恶劣，是赤裸裸的暴力行为了。这种法规，不仅违背了现代法治精神，而且是现代文明的倒退，不是在调和社会矛盾，而是在制造新的社会对抗，无
端增加人们的反感情绪：我让座与否是我个人的自由选择，凭什么要受到法规的威胁和恫吓。
The reason why moral abduction can succeed easily is the powerful effect of public opinion. Thus there have been forced donation and nonnatural apology. China is a moral society in which people's fear of the moral force is even stronger than their fear of law. Each of us have to face with many kinds of moral abduction. A person on the moral dimension is wrong doesn’t means any kinds of criticize from anyone is reasonable for him, at least the abu of his personality should be forbidden. However, it’s not to spread egoism, indeed any period will have a mainstream values, and moral is not only a personal matter, the degree of civilization of a society externally manifested as the degree of public respect for and practice of public morals.
