Manuscript review
Recommendation
1. Publish after minor changes
2. Publish unaltered
3. Review again after major changes
4. Reject (Paper is not of sufficient quality or novelty to be published in this Journal)
5. Reject (Paper is riously flawed; do not encourage resubmission.)
A. Evaluation
1. How do you evaluate the manuscript?
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
B. Content
lamp什么意思1. Is this paper of original value?
Yes, definitely
To some extent
中国考研报名
characterHardly
I cannot judge this
2. Is this paper scientifically correct?
Yes
Probably, although all details have not been checked
Doubtful
3. To what extent will the results be uful for other scientists?
Large
销售员英文
日常英语口语对话>mikroAverage
英文学习网站
Small
4. How would you characterize the level of the paper?
For experts only
Uful for people working in related fields
Understandable also for nonspecialists
Superficial
6. 儿童英文歌曲视频Is the bibliography reasonable?
Yes
After minor modifications
No
C. Prentation
1. Is this title adequate?
Yes
No
2. Does the abstract give a correct description of the content?
Yes
No
3. Is the general organization of the paper acceptable?
Yes倾慕的意思
No
4. With respect to the content, is the length of the paper reasonable?
Yes
No, should be incread
No, should be decread
5. How do you rate readability?
Good
Some effort needed
Large effort needed
Unreadable
niao
