1. 英孚英语Animal rights or 初中英语语法口诀accu什么意思Animal welfare
同声翻译设备租赁Animal rights: One of the basic tenets of animal rights is that humans do not have a right to u non-human animals for our own purpos, which include food, clothing, entertainment and viviction. This is bad on a rejection of speciesism and the knowledge that animals are ntient beings.
班车英文Animal welfare: There are many who believe that humans do have a right to u animals for some purpos, but believe that the animals should be treated better. This position is the animal welfare position.
The differences between Animal rights and Animal welfare:
While the animal rights position eks the elimination of the u of animals, the animal welfare position eks more humane conditions for the animals. The difference between the two positions can be en as applied to an issue like farmed animals.
While the animal rights position would hold that humans do not have the right to slaughter a
nd eat animals, the animal welfare position would be that the animals should be treated humanely before and during slaughter. The animal welfare position would not object to the consumption of animals, but would ek the elimination of cruel factory farming practices such as confining calves in veal crates, confining pregnant sows in gestational stalls, and debeaking chickens.
Animal rights advocates also oppo the cruel practices, but ek to eliminate the consumption of animals and animal products.
To most supporters of the animal welfare position, some us of animals are unacceptable becau the human benefit is minimal compared to the amount of animal suffering involved. The usually include us like fur, cosmetics testing, canned hunting, and dog fighting. On the issues, both the animal rights position and animal welfare position would call for the elimination of the us of animals.
2. Arguments For and Against Hunting
The killing of wild animals for food ud to be a part of everyday life. Today, hunting is a controversial issue becau it is frequently regarded as a recreational activity, residents are concerned about safety issues, and society’s attitudes towards animals are changing. At the heart of the hunting debate in the United States is one species: white-tailed deer.
Background
In many areas of the United States, white-tailed deer flourish becau of the lack of natural predators and the abundance of deer-friendly habitat. As pockets of green space shrink and disappear in our suburbs, the species has become the center of the debate over hunting, and many who consider themlves neither hunters nor animal activists find themlves drawn into the debate. The debate centers on practical and ethical issues including deer management, human/deer conflicts, non-lethal solutions and safety.
Arguments For
Hunting proponents argue that hunting is safe, effective, necessary, and inexpensive to taxpayers.
The injury rate for hunting is lower than that of some other forms of physical recreation, such as football and bicycling.
我的梦想 Proponents argue that hunting is an effective form of deer management becau it will remove a number of individual deer from a population and prevent tho individuals from reproducing. Since natural deer predators have been eliminated in many areas, hunters argue that hunting is necessary to perform the function of wolves or cougars in keeping the deer population in check. Hunting proponents also argue that reducing the deer population will reduce human/deer conflicts, such as car/deer collisions, Lyme dia and landscaping damage. 简单的英语小故事
Compared to sharpshooters and immunocontraception, hunting is inexpensive to taxpayers becau hunters will kill the deer for free. Also, hunting permits are sold by state wildlife management agencies, which are partially or fully supported by the sales of permits.
Regarding ethics, hunting proponents argue that killing a deer for food cannot be wor t词汇班
包丁
han killing a cow or a chicken. Furthermore, unlike the cow or the chicken, the deer lived a free and wild life before being killed and had a chance to escape. Hunters also argue that killing a number of deer benefits the ecosystem as a whole. Some hunters also oppo certain practices they consider unethical, such as baiting, canned hunting, trophy hunting, and hunting of stocked animals.
Arguments Against
Hunting opponents argue that hunting is unsafe, ineffective, unnecessary and unfair to taxpayers.
Opponents point out that compared to other forms of recreation, hunting injuries are far more likely to be fatalities. Approximately 100 people die in hunting accidents in the United States every year, and unlike other forms of recreation, hunting endangers the entire community, and not just the willing participants.
