damnation
英文文章修改意见
【篇一：英文论文修改建议】
英文论文修改建议
对于国内许多的研究人员而言，撰写一篇英文论文的难度不亚于让他们重新撰写一篇新的论文。在英文基础十分有限的情况下，又要发表英文论文，那么我们应该怎么做呢?下面辑文编译给大家一些英文论文修改建议，希望能帮到大家。
所谓英文论文修改服务，就是针对专业性较强、权威性较强的英文论文进行润色。对于不同的英文论文修改，我们建议大家一定要找到相关的切入点。只有找到关键的切入点，才能让修改之后的论文看起来更加专业权威，具有更高的可读性。
一、针对英文论文的修改，我们建议首先寻找整篇论文当中，语句不通顺，读起来不够清晰的地方。然后针对性的去除多余杂乱的词汇，让语句看起来干练简洁。现在的英文论文修改服务，是很多机构提供的服务项目之一，通常都是由高水准、丰富经验的人员帮助进行修改。
二、一篇好的英文论文，如果想要达到更加上等品位的标准，不仅应该寻找专业的英文论文修改机构帮助自己进行润色。更加需要在写作的过程当中，加强相关的学术性、权威性。让整篇论文看起来更加专业、加强论文当中的学术地方。
三、现在不少专业人士都喜欢通过英文论文修改服务，加强自己文章的可读性、权威性。也能够扩展文章当中的交流信息，进一步提升整体文章的素质以及写作水质。一篇上等品质的英文论文，一定要有自己的见解，独特的思维，从标题到内容甚至论文的每个结构，都需要有创新的焦点所在。
四、针对不同的英文论文修改，都可以根据内容，抓住相关的切入点，从而让文章的语言语句显得更加具有层次感，让阅读的人能够感受到文章结构的饱满程度。这样不仅可以让英文论文拥有更加深入研究的价值，还能够吸引阅读者反反复复的阅读。
辑文编译高质量的sci论文发表网,专业科研立项,sci医学论文编辑,还提供医学论文翻译,医学论文发表，医学课题设计,数据统计分析,医学基金申请等服务.微信号：sci-jwedit，关注微信，论文免费查重。
【篇二：英文论文审稿意见汇总】
英文论文审稿意见汇总
以下12点无轻重主次之分。每一点内容由总结性标题和代表性审稿人意见构成。
1、目标和结果不清晰。
it is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with experti in technical english editing paying particular attention to english grammar, spelling, and ntence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader.
发挥英语 2、未解释研究方法或解释不充分。
走遍法国 ◆ in general, there is a lack of explanation of replicates and statistical me
thods ud in the study.
◆ furthermore, an explanation of why the authors did the various experiments should be provided.
3、对于研究设计的rationale:
also, there are few explanations of the rationale for the study design.
4、夸张地陈述结论/夸大成果/不严谨：
the conclusions are overstated. for example, the study did not show
if the side effects from initial copper burst can be avoid with the polymer formulation.
foreigner怎么读
5、对hypothesis的清晰界定：
a hypothesis needs to be prented。
6、对某个概念或工具使用的rationale/定义概念：
what was the rationale for the film/sbf volume ratio?
7、对研究问题的定义：
try to t the problem discusd in this paper in more clear,
write one ction to define the problem
8、如何凸现原创性以及如何充分地写literature review:actv
the topic is novel but the application propod is not so novel.
9、对claim,如a＞b的证明，verification:
there is no experimental comparison of the algorithm with previously known work, so it is impossible to judge whether the algorithm is an improvement on previous work.
10、严谨度问题：
mnq is easier than the primitive pnqs, how to prove that.
11、格式（重视程度）：
dfi
◆ in addition, the list of references is not in our style. it is clo but not completely correct. i have attached a pdf instructions for authors which shows examples. ◆ before submitting a revision be sure that your material is properly prepared and
formatted. if you are unsure, plea consult the formatting nstructions to authors that are given under the instructions and forms button in he upper right-hand corner of the screen.
contrary 12、语言问题（出现最多的问题）：
epc是什么意思 有关语言的审稿人意见：
◆ it is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with experti in technical english editing paying particular attention to english grammar, spelling, and ntence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader. ◆ the authors must have their work reviewed by a proper translation/reviewing rvice before submission; only then can a proper review be
performed. most ntences contain grammatical and/or spelling mistakes or are not complete ntences.voa news
◆ as prented, the writing is not acceptable for the journal. there are pro
blems with ntence structure, verb ten, and clau construction.
◆ the english of your manuscript must be improved before resubmission. we str ongly suggest that you obtain assistance from a colleague who is well-verd i
n english or who native language is english.
◆ plea have someone competent in the english language and the subject matte r of your paper go over the paper and correct it. ?
◆ the quality of english needs improving.
来自编辑的鼓励：
encouragement from reviewers:小菜一碟英文
◆ i would be very glad to re-review the paper in greater depth once it has be
en edited becau the subject is interesting.
◆ there is continued interest in your manuscript titled …… which you subm
itted to the journal of biomedical materials rearch: part b - applied biomat
erials.
◆ the submission has been greatly improved and is worthy of publication.
老外写的英文综述文章的审稿意见
ms. ref. no.: ******
