文章内容 | 讲述了名为Tench的英国人，在历史上非常有名，他曾经因为参加英国的第一舰队（first fleet）——殖民澳大利亚的舰队。并出版两本书描述这一经历而著名。文中描述了他对原住民非常友好，关注人性。 |
题型分布与答案参考 | 判断题： 1 A great deal was known about Tench before arriving to Australia. FLASE 2 Tench drew pictures of what he saw during his journey. NOT GIVEN 3 Generally treat convicts well. FALSE 4 Tench’s opinion towards aboriginal remained unchanged. FALSE 5 An aboriginal gave Tench food as a gift when they first met. NOT GIVEN 6 Tench held unusual opinion in his time. TRUE competition 简答题： 1 What concrete information proved Tench had a good educational background? Diaries 2 What was ud to control convicts? Chains 3 Who told Tench to punish aboriginals? Governor Phillip 4 What activity did they engage on their way to H River? Food hunting 魔力水滴 5 Where did the escaped convicts intend to go? China 6 Where did Tench first meet aboriginals? Botany Bay |
相关拓展 | The Extraordinary Watkin Tench During the late 18th and 19th centuries, large numbers of convicts were transported to the various Australian penal colonies by the British government. One of the primary reasons for the British ttlement of Australia was the establishment of a penal colony to alleviate pressure on their overburdened correctional facilities. Over the 80 years more than 165,000 convicts were transported to Australia. Poverty, social injustice, child labor, harsh and dirty living conditions and long working hours were prevalent in 19th-century Britain. Dickens' novels perhaps best illustrate this; even some government officials were horrified by what they saw. Only in 1833 and 1844 were the first general laws against child labor (the Factory Acts) pasd in the United Kingdom. William Hogarth's Gin Lane, 1751 According to Robert Hughes in The Fatal Shore, the population of England and Wales, which had remained steady at 6 million from 1700 to 1740, began rising considerably after 1740. By the time of the American Revolution, London was overcrowded, filled with the unemployed, and flooded with cheap gin. Crime had become a major problem. In 1784 a French obrver noted that "from sunt to dawn the environs of London became the patrimony of brigands for twenty miles around." Each parish had a watchman, but British cities did not have police forces in the modern n. Jeremy Bentham avidly promoted the idea of a circular prison, but the penitentiary was en by many government officials as a peculiarly American concept. Virtually all malefactors were caught by informers or denounced to the local court by their victims. Pursuant to the so-called "Bloody Code", by the 1770s there were 222 crimes in Britain which carried the death penalty, almost all of which were crimes against property. The included such offences as the stealing of goods worth over 5 shillings, the cutting down of a tree, the theft of an animal, even the theft of a rabbit from a rabbit warren. The Industrial Revolution led to an increa in petty crime due to the economic displacement of much of the population, building pressure on the government to find an alternative to confinement in overcrowded goals. The situation was so dire that hulks left over from the Seven Years' War were ud as makeshift floating prisons. Eight of every 10 prisoners were in jail for theft. The Bloody Code was gradually rescinded in the 1800s becau judges and juries considered its punishments too harsh. Since lawmakers still wanted punishments to deter potential criminals, they increasingly applied transportation as a more humane alternative to execution. Transportation had been applied as a punishment for both major and petty crimes since the venteenth century. Around 60,000 convicts were transported to the British colonies in North America in the venteenth and eighteenth centuries. When the American Revolutionary War brought an end to that means of disposal, the British Government looked elwhere. After James Cook's famous voyage to the South Pacific in which he visited and claimed the east coast of Australia in the name of the British Empire, he described Botany Bay, the bay on which prent-day Sydney sits, as an ideal place to establish a ttlement. In 1788 the First Fleet arrived and the first British colony in Australia was established. |
文章内容 | 文章介绍了孩子为什么需要玩以及通过具体的游戏来提高孩子某些方面的能力。 |
题型分布与答案参考 | argosy段落标题配对7 15. E 16. H 17. F 18. B 19. G 20. D 21. C 多选题2(五选二，科学家需要play的原因) 22. A(缓解压力) 23. E(题目中cretive对应最后一段的inspire)cupid 段落填空3 24. navigator(定位Drake职业) 25. zin and coppers(… that the plate is made of需要定位盘子的材料) 26. Lancroft Library(原文中还有University信息，但是题目要求不能超过三个词) |
相关拓展 | Have you ever wondered how fun toys like Silly Putty, Gak and Slime are made? It's the properties of polymers, certain kinds of large molecules, that make the products bouncy, slimy, stretchy, breakable, hard, soft, sticky, moldable—and just plain fun to play with. Polymers are found in a variety of materials that have a broad range of properties. Materials made from polymers can be found in nature, such as amber and natural rubber, or generated synthetically, such as nylon, silicone and all plastics. The unique physical and chemical properties of polymeric materials can change depending on the amount of each different ingredient ud to make them. How will changing the ratio of ingredients affect how a polymeric material feels and behaves? You can make a polymer-bad material similar to Silly Putty at home by mixing together water, borax and Elmer's Glue. Elmer's is made up of polyvinyl acetate, which is a synthetic polymer. A polymer is a long molecule that is mostly made up of many similar repeating units. In the ca of polyvinyl acetate, each repeating unit contains an acetate group. Borax, which is a white powder made up of sodium tetraborate, can react with this acetate group. Specifically, one molecule of borax can react with acetate groups on two different polyvinyl acetate molecules (such as tho from the glue), creating a bond between the two polyvinyl acetate molecules. Borax cross-links the polyvinyl acetate molecules together. The more cross-linked molecules, the larger the polymeric material that is made from the reaction. Additionally, as more cross-links are made, the more the polymeric material becomes less liquidlike and gains solidity. Did each bag have some solid product (a polymer material) take form inside of it after mixing? Did bag C contain the solidest polymeric material, and did bag A contain the most liquidlike one? Elmer's Glue contains polyvinyl acetate molecules, which are long polymer molecules that are tangled with each other. This is what makes glue viscous, or thick and sticky. When borax (sodium tetraborate) is added to polyvinyl acetate and cross-links the latter's molecules to each other, the glue solution becomes more viscous. As borax cross-links more and more of the glue molecules together and they become more viscous, an increasingly larger and solid polymeric material is made from the reaction. The bag with the least amount of glue, bag A, should have been the most liquidlike, whereas the bag with the largest amount of glue, bag C, should have been the solidest. Store-bought Silly Putty and Slime are not made using polyvinyl acetate, but rather from organosiloxane polymers or polyvinyl alcohol to increa their durability. |
文章内容 | 第一段，第二段：通过钻石广告引出营销作用 第三段：现在已有的通过视觉、听觉以及味觉的营销手段 第四段-第七段：猴子和猩猩实验表明人类/动物趋向于与同类、以及同类领袖作出一样的选择 第八段-第十一段：利用趋同的心理通过名人代言的方式宣传产品 第十二段：提及了对二者关系的客观理解 |
题型分布与答案参考 | 单选题5 27. B 28. A 29. C 30. C 31. D 判断题5 32. NO 33. NG 34. NG 35. T 36. NO 段落信息配对 4(四种实验/人分别表明什么结论) 37. F 38. C 39. A 40. E gobo |
相关拓展 | Imagine that I have $100 and I offer you $20 of it, no strings attached. You'd take it, right? Any fool would; it's a windfall. But imagine further that you know I must give away part of my $100 or lo it all. All of a sudden my motives aren't entirely altruistic, but I'm still offering you free money. Take it or leave it, but no negotiation allowed. How would you feel? What would you do? If you were like a lot of people who have answered the questions in a psychological experiment over the years, you would now feel conflicted. Many of the people actually walked away from the deal, even though it would have meant a no-strings-attached twenty bucks in their pockets. Why? Becau the arrangement is fundamentally unfair, and once you know this your basic n of moral indignation clicks in. Your emotions and principles trump your pure rationality. Psychologists have demonstrated this in the laboratory, time and time again. It's known as the Ultimatum Game, and its counterintuitive findings are part of a broad new understanding of how the human brain and mind work. As it turns out, we are not very reasonable creatures much of the time, nor are we very aware. Indeed, we are under constant sway of our emotions and intuitions, and most of the time we are not even aware of just how quirky and emotional our everyday decisions are. Consider another experiment from the emerging field of social neuroscience. Psychologist John Bargh flashed words in front of volunteers, but so rapidly that they did not register in the conscious mind. Some of the words had to do with rudeness (like impolite and obnoxious) while others were the opposite (respect, considerate). The volunteers were later put in a simulated situation in which they could be civil toward one another—or not. Many who had en the words associated with rudeness were not. Two-thirds of the volunteers who had been primed with rudeness words interrupted another person afterward, compared to only 16 percent of tho primed with politeness words. I don't know about you, but I find this very sobering. It ems Bargh was able to make human beings behave politely or rudely, and without all that much effort, simply by fiddling with the automatic, emotional parts of their brain. What does this say about our autonomy, our free will? This is the basic question raid by neurologist Richard Restak in his new, somewhat dystopian book, "The Naked Brain," published late last month by Harmony Books. It's worth reading, both as a solid primer on a fascinating new psychological science and as a warning about the potential misu of brain science for nefarious purpos. The power of our emotional brain is not a good thing or a bad thing entirely. It depends on the situation. It's probably good that our righteous moral indignation clicks on automatically sometimes; our personal finances may suffer a bit, but we're better people for it. But how about other fast, automatic emotions, like fear? Cognitive psychologist Michael Gazzaniga has done many experiments with patients who, for medical reasons, have had their brains' hemispheres disconnected. This means that the left hemisphere, in charge of language, isn't communicating with the right hemisphere. Using distressing pictures and words, Gazzaniga in effect creates negative emotion in the brain's right hemisphere, out of conscious awareness. The subjects experience the emotion, but they don't understand it, so the rational left hemisphere attempts to interpret the mysterious emotion, and it sometimes makes mistakes. So an unexplained dip in mood or a nsation of discomfort might be wrongly attributed to, say, a spou's lfishness or even infidelity—with untoward conquences. One of the most fascinating and potentially alarming findings to come out of social neuroscience has to do with specialized brain cells called "mirror neurons." Mirror neurons cloly intertwine emotion with movement. They are what make you smile when a baby smiles, or make me grimace when I e you in pain. And the physical act of smiling or grimacing unleashes emotions of joy or suffering. In short, mirror neurons are the neurological foundation of empathy, which is a building block of compassion. But as Restak explains, such a potent connection between two brains could have a flip side: It means that all I have to do to manipulate your mind is to get your attention. Marketers and politicians are already familiar with the advances in brain science, and are using this knowledge to control our behavior. Or at least they are trying to do so. Advertiments are deliberately designed to target the emotional brain and create bonds, even cravings (one of our bast and most powerful emotional drives). Extensive rearch shows that our brains have certain hardwired propensities that might be exploited. For example, our brains tend to register frequently heard facts as true, even if they are patently fal. As a result, our memories and beliefs are highly malleable and unreliable. We also tend, if unchecked by the conscious reasoning mind, to focus overly on risk, inconvenience, hassles—anything negative. And rearchers have found that we all carry around an innate hostility toward "otherness," which means anyone not like us. The hardwired traits are difficult to shake, in part becau they were adaptive when our early ancestors were evolving on the savannahs and have been reinforced ever since. But they are clearly no longer adaptive, and indeed make us vulnerable to all sorts of subtle conditioning. Should we be worried? In the final analysis, Restak does not believe that brain science has advanced far enough yet to give marketers any persuasive powers they didn't have already. Despite remarkable progress in understanding the brain's anatomy and biochemistry, the organ is far too complex an array of interconnected circuits to be that easily manipulated with simple subliminal stimuli. Advertirs may be disappointed to hear it, but there is no "Buy now!" switch hidden among the neurons and synaps. That strikes me as a reasoned conclusion, just what one would expect from a deliberative scientific mind systematically weighing the available facts. So why do I have this nagging, unexplained n of foreboding coming from some recess in my brain? |
本文发布于:2023-07-10 22:36:36，感谢您对本站的认可！
本文链接：https://www.wtabcd.cn/fanwen/fan/90/173537.html
版权声明：本站内容均来自互联网，仅供演示用，请勿用于商业和其他非法用途。如果侵犯了您的权益请与我们联系，我们将在24小时内删除。
| 留言与评论（共有 0 条评论） |
