一些英文审稿意见的模板之答禄夫天创作
最近在审一篇英文稿，第一次做这个工作，还有点不知如何表达。幸亏遇上我的处女审稿，我想不会枪毙它的，给他一个major revision后接收吧。呵呵
网上找来一些零碎的资料参考参考。
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1、目标和结果不清晰。
It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with experti in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and ntence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader.
2、未解释研究方法或解释不充分。
In general, there is a lack of explanation of replicates and statistical methods ud in the st
udy.
Furthermore, an explanation of why the authors did the various experiments should be provided.
3、对于研究设计的rationale:
Also, there are few explanations of the rationale for the study design.
4、夸张地陈述结论/夸大成果/不严谨：
The conclusions are overstated. For example, the study did not show复活节的习俗
if the side effects from initial copper burst can be avoid with the polymer formulation.
5、对hypothesis的清晰界定：timetravel
A hypothesis needs to be prented。
6、对某个概念或工具使用的rationale/定义概念：
What was the rationale for the film/SBF volume ratio?
fisker
7、对研究问题的定义：
Try to t the problem discusd in this paper in more clear,
fsdwrite one ction to define the problem
hard什么意思中文意思8、如何凸现原创性以及如何充分地写literature review:军训讲话
The topic is novel but the application propod is not so novel.
9、对claim,如A＞B的证明，verification:
There is no experimental comparison of the algorithm with previously known work, so it is impossible to judge whether the algorithm is an improvement on previous work.
10、严谨度问题：
MNQ is easier than the primitive PNQS, how to prove that.
11、格式（重视程度）：
In addition, the list of references is not in our style. It is clo but not completely correct. I have attached a pdf file with "Instructions for Authors" which shows examples.
Before submitting a revision be sure that your material is properly prepared and formatted. If you are unsure, plea consult the formatting nstructions to authors that are given under the "Instructions and Forms" button in he upper right-hand corner of the screen.
12、语言问题（出现最多的问题）：
选择比努力更重要confidential有关语言的审稿人意见：
It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with experti in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and ntence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader.stuffit
The authors must have their work reviewed by a proper translation/reviewing rvice befo
re submission; only then can a proper review be performed. Most ntences contain grammatical and/or spelling mistakes or are not complete ntences.
As prented, the writing is not acceptable for the journal. There are problems with ntence structure, verb ten, and clau construction.
The English of your manuscript must be improved before resubmission. We strongly suggest that you obtain assistance from a colleague who is well-verd in English or who native language is English.
Plea have someone competent in the English language and the subject matter of your paper go over the paper and correct it ?
the quality of English needs improving.
