环境问题：
1. Food can be produced much more cheaply today becau of improved fertilirs and better machinery. However, some of the methods ud to do this may be dangerous to human health and may have negative effects on local communities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
[Sample]:kayak
Fertilirs and machinery ud to be welcomed by countries worldwide as esntial elements of industrialid farming, a landmark in the history of global agriculture. However, becau of being ud on a large scale worldwide, they have caud heated controversy. There is an ongoing debate on the possible damages of industrial farming caud to the environment and humanity. In my opinion, both are still correspondirreplaceable, although efficient and scientific utilisation is highly recommendedwaiter.
Fertilirs and machinery are both esntial in increasing crop yields, a solution to starvatio
n throughout the world. In history, manual work accounted for the majority of farming, from sowing, irrigating to harvesting. The slow pace of human labour made it impossible to produce enough crops to feed populations. Farming is, on the other hand, expod to the influence of many elements – weather conditions, soil compositions, pests or some unpredictable events like natural disasters. Fertilirs enhance crops or other foods’ resistance to external disturbances, while machinery saves manpower by finishing the major part of the work. 公务员考试培训机构The yield is raid to the highest, and lands are ud to the full. Enough food can be produced to meet/satisfy the market need now, despite the continued growth of the population.
Some people defy fertilirs and machinery becau of their concern telekomon environment. However, this notion has been challenged by advances in this area of knowledge. Technological innovation has made machinery more environmentally-friendly, and many machines ud for farming purpos are now able to operate withoutbertie generating much waste. Fertilirs, by comparison, are much less trfenvironment-damaging. Most fertilirs are organic and free of ingredients incompatible with the environment. Nor do they have
deleterious effects on people’s health.
Despite what has been discusd, farmers should beware of over-application of fertilirs. From an environmental perspective, fertilirs and machinery should be classified and ud with caution. The over—application of fertilirs not only has perpetually disastrous effects on farms but also injures the neighboring ecosystem. Many scientific studies suggest that a long history of fertilirs u can significantly reduce land fertility. Other conquences include幼儿英语课堂游戏 poisoning all wildlife feeding on farm crops, like birds, and polluting the neighboring water bodies. history是什么意思On healthy and safety grounds, fertilirs might bring remediless damage to eaters’ health, for some chemicals, although not机制英文 fatal themlves, might become life-threatening when accumulating inside eaters’ bodies.
On the basis of the above-mentioned arguments, people are convinced that the sustainable supply of foods still rests/lies on fertilirs and machinery, and the key is to u them properly and in moderation.
