Controversial as it is, Harper's big-picture argument is undoubtedly correct, and it is a real cau for concern. Bar associations and legal academics have begun talking about how the profession should adapt—discussions that are long overdue. The biggest problem with The Lawyer Bubble is not the warning it is sounding but its title; unlike tulips and other speculative bubbles in the past, lawyers will always be a necessity not a fad. But then, The Very, Very Challenging Job Market for Lawyers doesn't have the same ring to it.
1. 1.The book The Lawyer Bubble: A Profession in Crisis
A. has rattled legal profession.
B. is an exaggeration of the situation.
C. has caud deeper concern.
D. is a big blow to legal profession.
passive voice2. 2.Which of the following statements is true of Paragraph 2?
A. The decline of legal profession is driven by economic recession.
B. Globalization has pod a tremendous impact on lawyers in America
C. Many lawyers are unemployed with the introduction of legal software.
D. The downturn of legal profession is the outcome of a bunch of factors.
3. 3.It can be inferred in Paragraph 3 that a degree in law has
A. always been difficult to finish **plete.
B. enabled law graduates to cure decent jobs.
C. actually hampered some graduates in the job market.
D. overqualified students for their future jobs.
4. 4.According to Steven J. Harper,
快乐兔hospitalizefound的用法A. leaders in the legal profession are not to blame.
恍惚是什么意思B. the legal profession will burst like a bubble.
C. the inequity in the profession should be adjusted.
D. lawyers are actually a fad not a necessity.
5. 5.The author thinks that Harper's argument in the book is
A. alarming yet exaggerating.
泸江日语网B. disputable yet reasonable.
C. controversial and doubtable.
D. correct and reasonable.
踟蹰 Public health officials grappling with the obesity epidemic have debated a wide range of approaches to helping slim the American waistline. To some degree, everything from building more sidewalks to banning chocolate milk has been explored. Yet few tactics hav
e been as polarizing as the possibility of introducing tariffs on treats. Despite endorment from veral respected obesity rearchers and politicians, soda taxes, for example, have been subject to vere scrutiny, as critics protested that implementing a tax before verifying that it would achieve the end result was shortsighted and potentially overreaching. So, in attempt to determine just how sin taxes might impact people's food choices, psychologists from the University of Buffalo decided to put junk food levies to the test—in the lab.
>actor
