美国大学协会“批判性思维评估标准”(双语)

更新时间:2023-06-09 08:10:04 阅读: 评论:0

CRITICAL THINKING VALUE RUBRIC 批判性思维评估标准
American Association of Colleges and Universities美国大学协会
domain controllerDefinition 定义
Critical thinking is a habit of mind characterized by the comprehensive exploration of issues, ideas, artifacts, and events before accepting or formulating an opinion or conclusion.
ultrabook批判性思维是接受或形成意见或结论前就问题、构思,器物和事件进行综合探讨的思维方式。
Evaluators are encouraged to assign a zero to any work sample or collection of work that does not meet benchmark (cell one) level performance.
洛丽塔美国版建议评价者对于不符合基准表现的任何工作样品或工作组合给以零分。
初二英语辅导surges
Capstone 顶点
4
Milestones 进阶
Benchmark 基准
1
3
王兆飞博客
2
Explanation of issues
问题解释
Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated clearly and described comprehensively, delivering all relevant information necessary for full understanding.
问题的解释 问题的说明审慎考虑,明确规定,全面说明,提供必要充分了解的所有相关信息。
Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated, described and clarified so that understanding is not riously impeded by omissions.
表述,描述和阐明审慎考虑的问题,保证理解不为严重疏漏所阻碍。
Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated but description leaves some terms undefined, ambiguities unexplored, boundaries undetermined, and/or backgrounds unknown.
陈述审慎地考虑问题,但是在描述中仍有一些不确定,含糊不清未开发,界限不明,和/或背景不清的方面。
Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated without clarification or description.
陈述审慎考虑的问题时没有阐明或或描述。
Evidence 依据
Selecting and using information to investigate a point of view or conclusion 选择和使用信息调查的观点或结论
Information is taken from source(s) with enough interpretation/evaluation, to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis. Viewpoints of experts are questioned thoroughly. 有源信息经充分的解释/评估,上升为综合分析或合成的证据。彻底质疑专家的观点。
disappearing
Information is taken from source(s) with enough interpretation/evaluation to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis. Viewpoints of experts are subject to questioning.
有源信息经充分的解释/评估,上升为连贯分析或综合的证据。质疑专家的观点。
Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis. 有源信息经一定的解释/评估,还不足以上升为连贯分析或综合的证据。认为专家的观点为大概率事实,几无质疑
Viewpoints of experts are taken as mostly fact, with little questioning.
没有任何解读和评估地应用有源信息,没有质疑地采信专家的观点。
Influence of context and assumptions
背景和假设的影响
Thoroughly (systematically and methodically) analyzes own and others' assumptions and carefully evaluates the relevance of contexts when prenting a position. 彻底地(系统地,有条理地)分析自己和他人的假设。在表明立场时,谨慎评估前因后果的关联性。
Incorporates new directions or approaches to the assignment in the final product.
religion选择新的方向或方法达到工作的最终目标。
Considers new directions or approaches without going beyond the guidelines of the assignment. 在没有超出工作准则的前提下考虑新的方向和途径。
Stays strictly within the guidelines of the assignment.
严格限制在工作准则之内。
Student's position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis)
学生的立场(观点、论点/假设)
Specific position (perspective,
thesis/hypothesis) is imaginative, taking into account the complexities of an issue. Limits of position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis) are acknowledged. Others' points of view are synthesized within position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis). 具体立场(观点、论点/假设)富有想象力,考虑到问题的复杂性。承认立场的局限性(观点、论点/假设)。在本人的立场内综合他人的观点。
Specific position (perspective,
thesis/hypothesis) takes into account the complexities of an issue. Others' points of view are acknowledged within position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis). 具体立场(观点、论点/假设)考虑到问题的复杂性。在本人的立场内承认他人的观点
Specific position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis) acknowledges different sides of an issue.
具体立场承认一个问题不同方面的影响
Specific position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis) is stated, but is simplistic and obvious.
说明具体的立场,但过简单和表面化。
Conclusions and related outcomes (implications and conquences)
结论及有关结果 (影响和后果)
环球雅思口语
Conclusions and related outcomes (conquences and implications) are logical and reflect student’s informed evaluation and ability to place evidence and perspectives discusd in priority order
结论和相关结果(后果和影响)合乎逻辑和反映学生的信息评估和将证据和观点在讨论中排序能力。
Conclusion is logically tied to a range of information, including opposing viewpoints; related outcomes (conquences and implications) are identified clearly.
结论逻辑上与一系列信息相关, 包括清楚地说明了相反的观点;相关的结果(后果和影响)
Conclusion is logically tied to information (becau information is chon to fit the desired conclusion); some related outcomes (conquences and implications) are identified clearly. 结论是逻辑上相关的信息(因为信息选择适合所需的结论网络用语bks是什么意思),一些相关的结果(后果和影响)标识清楚。
Conclusion is inconsistently tied to some of the information discusd; related outcomes (conquences and implications) are oversimplified.
结论不一致地关联一些讨论的信息, 相关结果(后果和影响)过于简单化。

本文发布于:2023-06-09 08:10:04,感谢您对本站的认可!

本文链接:https://www.wtabcd.cn/fanwen/fan/90/138995.html

版权声明:本站内容均来自互联网,仅供演示用,请勿用于商业和其他非法用途。如果侵犯了您的权益请与我们联系,我们将在24小时内删除。

标签:观点   信息   问题   工作
相关文章
留言与评论(共有 0 条评论)
   
验证码:
Copyright ©2019-2022 Comsenz Inc.Powered by © 专利检索| 网站地图