摘要
1902年德国法学者郭特西密特出版了《行政刑法》一书，行政刑法的概念首次提出，并迅速引起德国法学界的广泛关注。行政犯与行政刑法密切相关，行政刑法概念的提出也使得行政犯的研究得以充分展开。随后，日本学者将行政犯及行政刑法理论发扬光大，并形成了自己独特的体系内容。我国直至上世纪八十年代末才开始接触这一理论，对这一问题的研究尚处于起步阶段。行政刑法是伴随着刑法谦抑理论，西方非犯罪化、非刑罚化浪潮等新兴刑法思潮而生的一个新概念，这一概念及其理论对于行政犯罪不断增多，刑法修改频繁，刑罚严厉的当代中国有着重要的研究价值。然而，行政刑法经过百余年的发展，至今仍在许多问题上，甚至在一些基础性问题上分歧重重，聚讼纷纭，这对我国借鉴、研究这一理论成果带来一定困难。本文即致力于对行政犯罪及行政刑法的一些争论问题做一探讨，试图为我国行政刑法理论的发展奠定一个良好的基础。
论文主体共分五个部分，分别讨论了行政刑法理论中争论较多、分歧较大的五个基础性问题，包括作为行政刑法的基础前提的行政犯的概念及其性质问题，行政刑法自身的概念、性质问题，以及行政刑法的立法模式问题。在每一部分之下，笔者均首先介绍了争论问题的几种代表性的观点，然后结合笔者的思考，对其进行一定的分析、总结，并表明自己的主张。
考研政治答题卡>英语论文答辩技巧
在行政犯的概念问题上，认为应从实质上理解行政犯的概念；在行政犯的外延上，鉴于我国区分犯罪与
违法的法律实际，认为应将行政犯限定为犯罪的一种，即作为犯罪概念下的子概念。文中阐述了理解行政犯关键在于把握“行政”与“伦理”两点，即行政犯违背了“行政目的”，具有行政违反性，是“禁止的恶”，而不以伦理非难为前提，不必然具有伦理违反性。
在行政犯的性质问题上，区分了行政犯、行政违法与刑事犯三者，在行政犯与刑事犯间笔者采质的区别说，在行政违法与行政犯间采量的区别说，而在行政违法与刑事犯间则采质量区别说。
在行政刑法的概念问题上，通过总结学者们对行政刑法概念的不同界定，
认为确定这一概念关键在于明晰两点，即行政犯与行政刑罚。因此，笔者在分析行政刑法概念时主要对这两点进行了阐述。
在行政刑法的性质问题上，承继前述的行政犯与行政刑法观，笔者赞同刑事法说，认为刑事法说比行政法说符合我国实际，而交叉属性说与双重属性说造成法律体系划分更加模糊，增添不必要的混乱。且我国行政法与刑事法的交叉、衔接等等现实问题可以在刑事法的理论框架内得到解决，而不必另行设立一个与行政法和刑事法相平行的行政刑法。
在行政刑法立法模式问题上，赞同在刑法典之下分立各小行政刑法典的双轨制。同时认为，结合我国具体国情，在短期内宜采用独立散在模式作为过渡。
关键词：行政犯；行政刑法；立法模式
Abstract
Goldschmidt-a German jurist published his book -《Administrative Criminal Law》in 1902.The Concept of Administrative Criminal Law is first made in this book, and accepted Widely by German jurists. Administrative crime is strictly connected with Administrative criminal law,so the new concept of Administrative criminal law made the study on administrative crime spread out completely in the 20th century.Afterward, This Concept was introduced to Japan, and The Japane jurists Enrichmented it and have formed their own Unique Theory of Administrative Criminal Law. Tt was not until the end of 1980s that the study on administrative Criminal Law started in our country, so the study on it in our country is still at an early stage. The administrative criminal law is a new Concept which Developing with the the Western criminal tides such as decriminalization ,depenalization and the theory of “ultima ratio penalty” .The rearch on Administrative Criminal Law has special significance for Contemporary China,in which The Criminal Code changing frequently with the Administrative Crime rising fastly and the penalties Severe.However, with more than a hundred year’s Development, the theory of administrative criminal law still has many disputes on kinds 0f issues, even in some basic issues, which makes it difficult for us to learn and study this theory. The a
uthor of this Paper tries to make some analys about the disputes ,with the hope that it would be a good foundation for the further development of administration criminal law in our country.
商务英语考试时间jd是什么意思This paper consists of five parts, respectively discuss five controversial fundamental problems in theory of administrative criminal law, including the concepts and property of administrative offen which is as the foundation and prerequisite, the concepts and property of administrative criminal law, and legislation model of administrative criminal law. First ,writer introduces veral reprentative views in each part, and then analysis and summarizes them and proves viewpoint of
my own which is combined with the author's consideration.
江苏禽流感最新消息
farm是什么意思Part one is about the concept of administrative offen. Writer reckons that we should understand the concepts of administrative offen in esnce. Considering legal reality of distinction between crime and illegal in china, writer restrict administrative offen as a crime, which is as a concept under the concept of crime. Meanwhile writer think that holding two aspects “administration” and “ethic” is the key to understand the administrative offen. Administrative offen violates “administrative purpos”, posss nature of administrative violation. It is not under the precondition of ethical criticism, and it do not necessarily have nature of ethical violation.
Part two is about the property of administrative crime.On this issue,writer discuss peratly among administrative offen, administrative crimeand criminal crime. Between Administrative crimeand criminal crime,the writer agrees with Quality Differentiation Theory. Between administrative offen and administrative crime agrees with Quantity Differentiation Theory. Between administrative offen and criminal crime agrees with Quality and Quantity Differentiation Theory.google英语翻译
Part three is about the concept of administrative criminal law. After summarizing Jurists’kinds of different definitions,the writer perceives that the concept of administrative crime and the concept of administrative criminal penalty are the two key points which must be clarified in define the concept of administrative criminal law. Therefore,in this part,the writer mainly clarifies the two points.
シナリオ>货到付款什么意思
The fourth part analysis the property of administrative criminal law. Corresponding with the author’s view on administrative offen and administrative criminal law above-mentioned, writer agrees with criminal law say, thinks that criminal law say is more clor to chine reality than administrative law say. Cross-property say and dual property say make division of the legal system be more fuzzy, add unnecessary confusion, furthermore crossover and convergence of administrative law and criminal law can be solved in the theoretical framework of criminal law. Whereas we need not t up administrative criminal law which is
parallel with the administrative law and criminal law.
The last part discuss the legislation model of administrative criminal law. Writer agrees with the dual-track system of respectively tting up criminal law code under the criminal code; but as the asrtorical significance, considering chine actual conditions ,writer think that we should adopt independent scattered mode as appropriate t ransition in the short term.章程英文
Key words: administrative crime; administrative criminal Law; model of legal system;
