U.S. Origin瑜伽的英语 Rules in Uncertain Times
——Substantially Transformed
美国原产地规则之实质转变规则
Until the Trump administration’s war on trade, many companies did not consider country of origin to be of critical importance to their import process. Certainly, country of origin questions were, and remain, important for determining whether goods are subject to import restraints (quotas) or for qualification under various free trade agreements and special duty programs such as 9801 or 9802; and it is of critical importance when we consider whether certain goods and materials are subject to Antidumping or Countervailing duties, but, for much of the goods that are imported, it was a non-issue. But no longer. Under the Trump administration’s war on trade, we must now contend with and consider whether the goods we import are subject to additional duties under Section 201, 232 and the overwhelming impact of ction 301 duties on goods from China. Companies are asking about whether they can shift their supply chain to take advantage of more favorable countries, and if so, h
ow far down the supply chain the shift must occur.
环保材料 英文
Who Responsibility is It to Determine Country of Origin?
Section 484 of the Tariff Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. - 1484), obligates an importer of record (IOR) to u reasonable care when entering or classifying imported merchandi, asssing duties, reporting accurate trade statistics and determining whether any other applicable legal requirement has been met. Determining and reporting the origin of imported goods falls within the scope of ction 1484, both for purpos of duty preference claims as well as complying with basic entry requirements for reporting the correct country of origin of imported merchandi. (CBP Form 7501 "Entry Summary" Instructions: Detailed instructions on completing CBP Form 7501. ) Fal statements with respect to origin can result in the asssment of penalties under 19 U.S.C. -1592. Additionally, errors made with respect to the country of origin can result in the loss of special duty privileges, detention or exclusion of goods at the time of admission, or a demand for redelivery of the articles to Customs custody. Articles that are not timely retur
ned to Customs custody are subject to liquidated damages equal to the value of the unreturned articles. Goods that are improperly marked or not marked in accordance with the country of origin marking statute (19 U.S.C. - 1304) can also be assd a special “marking duty” equal to 10 percent of the value of the mis-marked goods.
In United States v. Golden Ship Trading Company, 25 C.I.T. 40 (2001) the government sued an importer of t-shirts from the Dominican Republic, claiming that the true country of origin of the t-shirts was China and not the Dominican Republic as reported. The government sought a monetary penalty for negligence. The importer argued that it was not negligent in misreprenting the origin of the t-shirts becau she relied on the information provided by the exporter and accepted his reprentations that the Dominican Republic was the country of origin of the t-shirts. The court, however, determined that the importer, Ms. Wu, failed to exerci reasonable care becau she failed to verify the information contained in the entry documents related to country of origin. The court explained that under the definition of reasonable care, Ms. Wu had the responsibility to at least undertake an effort to verify the information on the entry docume
nts. The court said that there is a distinct difference between legitimately attempting to verify the entry information and blindly relying on the exporter’s asrtions. Had Ms. Wu inquired as to the origin of the imported t-shirts or, at minimum, attempted to check the credentials and business operations of the exporter, she could make an argument that she attempted to exerci reasonable care and competence to ensure that the statements on the entry documents were accurate, but she had not. The court found that Ms. Wu’s failure to attempt to verify the entry document information shows she did not act with reasonable care, and had, therefore, attempted to negligently introduce merchandi into the commerce of the United States in violation of 19 U.S.C.- 1592 (a)(1)(A). Becau of this, she was required to pay a civil penalty for her negligence.
Understanding the U.S. Country of Origin Rules
For non-preferential duty treatment, the U.S. country or origin (COO) rules follow the U.S. country of origin marking rules laid out in ction 134 of the Customs Regulations. (19 CFR Part 134, et q.)plywood
The rules provide that the “country of origin” of a good is the country in which the good is wholly manufactured, produced, or grown. Such an article is said to be "wholly the growth or product" of that country and as such, it is considered to be “originating” in that country. Similarly, articles that are procesd or manufactured exclusively in a country from materials that have been wholly grown or produced in that same country are also considered to be "wholly the product or manufacture" of that country.
blight
石家庄新东方中等专业学校When an article is not wholly the growth, product, or manufacture of that country, that is, when the product incorporates or reflects materials or processing, or both, which are attributable to two or more countries, origin determinations become more problematic. In such cas, the impact of materials or articles that originate in a country other than the country of final processing must be considered when determining the country of origin of the finished good.bottleneck
If the article in question is not wholly manufactured, produced, or grown within a single country, then we must consider the source or origin of any component or material that is
吴莫愁 price tag
misjudgeud in the manufacture, production, or asmbly of the good, and whether the further work or material added to an article in a subquent country effected a “substantial transformation” on that part, component or material, so as to render such other country the “country of origin” of the end product. (19 CFR Part 134.1)
comprehensionbabaleU.S. Customs” Country of Origin Regulations
A common misconception by importers and the trade is that Part 102 of the Customs Regulations provides for general non-preferential origin rules. This is not the ca. The preamble to Part 102 of the Customs Regulations provides that this part ts forth rules for determining the country of origin of imported goods for the purpos the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the United States-Morocco Free Trade Agreement regulations; the United States-Bahrain Free Trade Agreement, and for determining the country of origin of textile and apparel products.
