优势日语基于SOLO分类理论的2017-2019年高考化学试题能
力结构研究
employee
摘要：随着经济的发展，社会需要高素质的人才，这使得我国越来越重视教育的发展和改革教育。化学这门科目作为高考的一部分，其考查的内容和结构对人才选拔以及后续的化学教学有很重要的意义。现如今高考化学统一命题的省份居多，统一的步伐正在迈出，因此需要研究高考化学试题的能力结构特点，找出试题的能力结构，从而准确把握全国卷的考查内容以及对学生能力的要求，进而指导教学实践活动，最终实现对人才的培养。
本文将SOLO水平层次与高考化学考纲相结合，根据建立的试题评价表，对2017-2019年的全国Ｉ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ卷以及天津市的化学高考试题逐题对试题水平结构和考查内容进行分析，得出试题能力结构和考查内容的SOLO水平层次的特点，并且从横向和纵向进行对比研究，进而得出近三年全国卷与天津卷高考命题结构特点和考查内容的异同以及高考命制试题的趋向，这将对自主命题的天津市关于试题编制和教师教学过程等方面都能提供科学的意见与借鉴。
英语语言学毕业论文
研究表明：就层次方面，各套试题主要是以关联水平层次和多点水平层次为主，二者将近占试题分值比
例的60%~70%；全国Ⅰ卷、全国Ⅱ卷、全国Ⅲ卷在单一水平层次试题比值的分布在20%上下浮动，而近三年天津卷对单一水平层次的考查比例较大。就知识模块而言，“化学基本概念和基本理论”所占各套试卷的比例最大，而且涉及多个SOLO水平层次，用此模块来考查学生的综合能力。次之，“实验基础”模块仅次于“化学基本概念和基本理论”所占的比例，该部分内容与新课标中提出对科学探究作为主要的考查部分的要求相一致。整体来看，全国卷已经不局限于考查学生基本知识的掌握程度，已经将知识立意转为能力立意，重视培养学生的创新精神。天津卷主要检验学生主干知识的掌握，以及多个知识点的记忆能力，对能力立意的体现不明显，试题难度也较全国卷而言简单。综上所述，本研究可为高考命题人以及高中教师提出一些科学的建议。
关键词：SOLO分类理论；高考化学试题；能力结构
Rearch on the Ability Structure of Chemistry Test Questions in2017-2019College Entrance Examination Bad on SOLO
Taxonomy
Abstract
With the development of economy,the society needs high-quality talents,which makes our country pa
y more and more attention to the development and reform of education.As apart of the college entrance examination,chemistry is of great significance to the lection of talents and the subquent chemistry teaching.At prent, most of the provinces have unified chemistry questions in the college entrance examination,and the pace of unification is stepping forward.Therefore,it is necessary to study the ability structure characteristics of the chemistry questions in the college entrance examination,find out the ability structure of the questions,so as to accurately grasp the examination content of the national paper and the requirements for students' ability,and then guide the teaching practice activities,and finally realize the cultivation of talents.
In this paper,the SOLO level is combined with the chemistry test syllabus of the college entrance examination.According to the test evaluation table,the paper analyzes the test level structure and test content of the national I,II,III and Tianjin chemistry college entrance examination questions one by one in2017-2019,and obtains the characteristics of the SOLO level of the test ability structure and test content,and makes a comparative study from the horizontal and vertical,and then It is concluded that the similarities and differences in the structure and content of the national and Tianjin college entrance examination papers and the tendency of the test questions of the life system of the college entrance examination in the past three years will provide scientific suggestions and reference for the
independent proposition of Tianjin on the preparation of the test questions and the teaching process of teachers.
The rearch shows that:in terms of levels,each t of test questions is mainly correlationlevel and Multipointlevel,which account for nearly60%~70%of the score of the test questions;the ratio of national Volume I,national Volume II and national Volume III in the singlelevel level test questions fluctuates in20%,while the proportion of Tianjin volume to the singlelevel test is relatively large in the past three years.In terms of knowledge module,"basic concepts and theories of Chemistry"account for the largest proportion of each t of papers,and involve multiple SOLO levels.U this module to test students'comprehensive ability.Secondly,the proportion of"experimental basis" module is next to that of"basic concepts and theories of Chemistry",which is consistent with the requirements of scientific inquiry as the main examination part in the new curriculum standard.As a whole,the national volume is not limited to the examination of students'mastery of basic knowledge.It has turned knowledge idea into ability idea and attached great importance to the cultivation of students'innovation spirit.Tianjin test paper mainly tests students'mastery of main knowledge and memory ability of multiple knowledge points.It is not obvious to reflect the ability intention,and the difficulty of the test paper is also simpler than the national test paper.To sum up,this study can provide some scientific suggestions for the college entrance examiners and high school teachers.
Graduate:Ren hui(Major in chemistry teaching)
bogusDirected by:Prof.Wang Shengwen Key words:SOLO Taxonomy;Chemistry test questions of college entrance examination;Ability structure
目录
第一章绪论 (1)
茱
1.1课题研究背景 (1)
1.2研究意义 (2)
1.3研究内容 (3)
stocks
1.4研究对象 (3)
1.5研究创新点 (4)
1.6研究方法 (4)
第二章SOLO分类理论基础及国内外研究现状 (5)
2.1SOLO分类理论的源头 (5)
2.2SOLO分类理论的内容 (6)
2.3国内外研究现状 (7)
tmdi 302.4SOLO分类理论下高考化学试题思维层次划分 (11)
2.4.1SOLO分类理论与化学学科的相关性 (11)
2.4.2SOLO分类理论下高考化学试题思维层次划分...........................12第三章高考化学试题能力结构分析 (17)
3.1高考化学全国卷Ⅰ试题结构 (17)
3.1.12017年高考化学试题知识模块SOLO层次统计分析 (17)
3.1.22018年高考化学试题知识模块SOLO层次统计分析 (19)
3.1.32019年高考化学试题知识模块SOLO层次统计分析 (21)
3.2高考化学全国卷Ⅱ试题结构 (23)
3.2.12017年高考化学试题知识模块SOLO层次统计分析 (23)
3.2.22018年高考化学试题知识模块SOLO层次统计分析 (25)
3.2.32019年高考化学试题知识模块SOLO层次统计分析 (27)
3.3高考化学全国卷Ⅲ试题结构 (29)
3.3.12017年高考化学试题知识模块SOLO层次统计分析 (31)
3.3.22018年高考化学试题知识模块SOLO层次统计分析 (33)
3.3.32019年高考化学试题知识模块SOLO层次统计分析 (35)
3.4高考化学天津市试题结构 (37)
3.4.12017年高考化学试题知识模块SOLO层次统计分析 (39)
3.4.22018年高考化学试题知识模块SOLO层次统计分析 (41)
gatsby3.4.32019年高考化学试题知识模块SOLO层次统计分析 (43)
第四章高考化学试题的SOLO层次特点 (44)
4.12017-2019年高考化学试题的SOLO层次横向特点分析 (44)
4.22017-2019年高考化学试题的SOLO层次纵向特点分析 (49)
第五章研究结论建议与展望 (55) flypaper
5.1研究结论 (55)吴莫愁 price tag
5.2建议 (56)
5.3研究展望 (57)
参考文献 (59)
致谢 (62)
攻读研期间科研成果 (63)
