晦涩深奥（Obscure）
A regular or regular ntence structure is most acceptable. In the early days of using language to express ideas, if the language experience is scarce, qualified or poor, then the most conventional ntence structure can convey the ideas or points of view that can be expresd. If the writer has distinctive healthy personality, also can be in the process of language expression in unconventional, the u of personalized language to express individual thoughts, as long as consistent, will gradually form their own unique style. This is perfectly understandable and the expression of fondness for many interesting learners. However, makers of obscure language has a completely different expression motive, conventional ntence or conventional ntence structure, they must be cared to u, at least not the article is full of conventional ntence; personalized ntence or ntence structure, they also worry about a routine. So, how to break the conventional structure began to think of the ntence combination method not chapters dismantling, no rules. Sometimes, a simple words can say clear meaning, but like to u the complex ntences, effective information and invalid information together, let the reader unable to make effective screening; sometimes, need a few words to say clearly, they must make the ntence structure, the abnormal height of solidification the complex, at the expen of grammatical errors, syntactic errors, coupled with the coinage form, read it very obscure.
agressif
The mere fabrication of words and the disruption of the regular structure of the ntence have vexed the well meaning reader. But the deliberate makers of obscure language still have more obnoxious tricks. According to my obrvation, this "more
英文逗号
网银支付流程annoying trick" is to u the fake words repeatedly in the article to increa the frequency and increa the difficulty of reading. The real motivation for people to comprehend the author especially admired this practice, but if the exhaustion of the worst malicious speculation, perhaps the author is to the reader to withsimple visual function, to strengthen memory of frequent fal words, so as to enhance the influence of the works and the readers' attention to the author. Otherwi, what should be done to make the words repeated into the readers' view after faking the words? I don't think this is a simple expression habit of the author, I don't think this is the author objectively demonstrated a unique way of thinking or deep thinking level, becau in the modern Chine dictionary there are so many ready-made words available, why to waste a lot of brains, heaps of coin?what do you think
The advantage of this kind of action to the author is to convey to readers the so-called "abstract thinking ability", "deep thought Kung Fu" and "language obscurity level"". Some readers have the same hobby with the author, usually by the blunt forgery by deception, that the author advanced knowledge of the most probably it did not actually happen even to the unpredictable realm, as there i
initiative
s no understanding of the writer's original intention, not in question. I even dare by my own bold speculation, some authors in writing, may you even know what driveling about. I doubt if I regard learning as a toy. I have not finished my expression with obscure language, but at least understand abstract thinking and forged basic vocabulary have no relevance, which belongs to the category of abstract thinking mode of thinking, language vocabulary is forged belongs to the category of morality, which is obviously
two distinct problems. To be sure, the expression of thought must be in some form, mainly in the form of language. But the obscurity of language is not necessarily related to the depth of thought, nor does it establish the proportional relationship to be tested and effective. The kind of so-called "more obscure and more profound understanding" is simply not true, if this is just a non intentional misinterpretation, can be identified as "error", but if this motive is purely to show off his profound knowledge, it should be unceremoniously identified as "unhealthy".
The deliberate pursuit of the obscurity of language influences the reader in a pluralistic way. For tho who don't know the truth, they may go to the erroneous zone of knowledge rearch and evaluation, and think that the more obscure the language is, the deeper the knowledge will be. If you hold this understanding of people, does not have the language skill art, not through eating the obscu长沙日语
re language content, great pressure will read and study, even lo confidence in our knowledge. Especially for tho who have a strong application discussion topic, such as the application of legal papers and guiding the judicial enforcement practices, if required by the author understand very practitioner of a problem or suggestion processing legal rules, and it is unable to accurately understand the meaning of the author, then read this article is tantamount to a waste of emotion; the other on the one hand, for tho "unhealthy" makers, reading the works of obscure language,
Perhaps it is their inherent pursuit, and consciously as an important evaluation of the level of learning. Once you blow
up this unhealthy trend, in the face of tho popular works, the unhealthy advocates will u the comparative method, the lack of language features obscure works as a popular books, branded as "even in a state of disorder of garbage".
It is pointed out that obscurity is not equivalent to conciness, but not to conciness. The principle of brevity in language u is the basic requirement of creation, which is to u as little linguistic quantity as possible to convey as much information as possible. Nowadays there are a lot of works no better follow the conci principle, which leads to redundancy unbearable, waste the reader's rea
compat
ding time. A word can be summed up the meaning of the author to deliberately elongated, with Shandong as saying that "the more out of a sudden," old "get old bad goods from Hong Kong, but no matter how the expansion is repeated in the same meaning, and not discuss the depth and angle are different. In my opinion, this is not the pursuit of conci style of writing is nothing more than to try to gather the number of words, the amount of equipment, but also reflects the author's ideological status and knowledge level. However, obscurity is not equivalent to brevity. Without the u of obscure language expression of specific object of discussion, deliberate forgery of vocabulary, syntax or conventional adver changes to counterfeit vocabulary repeatedly occur with high frequency, the pursuit of obscure is a pursuit of * *. If the pursuit of obscure language belongs to the category of language and morality, then the normal u of conci language belongs to the category of linguistic competence.
推荐个成人网站Of cour, from the point of view of freedom of expression and
nail up
freedom of expression, the u of any form of language to express one's own ideas is entirely a question of freedom given by heaven or the constitution. In expressing their thoughts, each author should have a fully expresd t of days or statutory safeguards that no one el can interfere with. But any freedom of expression has boundaries, including the content boundary and the form bounda
ry. Expressions beyond boundaries are not free, should be restricted or prohibited, or at least should not be promoted. Apart from the content boundary and the formal boundaries, I believe that at least two principles should be firmly maintained by the author. One is the principle of respect for the laws of language, and the other is the principle of the adaptation of language to the nature of content. If we do not respect the laws of language, and deliberately try to change the law, or choo the language form and the content of the content does not match, it may touch the problem of language and morality. "Obscurity" is only a subjective reflection of the form of the language in the u of the subject. It is not in itlf a question of whether it violates language or morality. For some specific creative objects, bad on the specific nature of the work, the u of obscure language may be necessary, at this time, if the u of too popular language may em very irregular. However, if language urs adopt veral obscure means that I mentioned earlier, especially the falsification of words and the repetition of them, it will involve language and morality. Obviously, freedom of expression and language and morality are entirely different things, not to mention in the same breath.
marry
What makes people love dearly is that the lethality of obscure language has already come into being, and has already played
