雅思作文
Agree/disagree 同意1边-替代类报纸
Some people say that we no longer need printed newspaper, do you agree or disagree?
In the prent era, newspapers have become less popular, so it is
argued that they will disappear. I strongly agree with this opinion.
The main reason is that there are many better alternatives, which reduces the value of newspapers to us. Nowadays, news media websites and mobile applications can not only inform us of the latest affairs around the world but the information is prented in multimodal ways such as video and
audio, providing audience a more engaging reading experience than printed media. News can also be updated online immediately, keeping us informed of the latest trend, whereas it takes at least 24 hours for a newspaper to be published and delivered. Therefore, the current technologies have made reading news more engaging and allow us to keep up with the constantly changing world.
Furthermore, modern technologies are also more affordable and accessible than newspapers, making t
hem suitable for everyone to gain knowledge. It is no doubt that nearly everyone can afford a device regardless it be a mobile phone or laptop and most public places provide free wifi, allowing people to read online at no expen. Even though there are some remote areas with no internet connection, many community centers have a TV so that residents can watch news programs free of charge. Besides the affordability, it is also more convenient for us to read online since we can save the time spent on travelling to a physical place to purcha a newspaper without carrying a pile of papers with us.
karina smirnoffIn conclusion, bad on the evidence analyd , printed newspapers are doomed to lo their role in society becau they provide us less advantages than modern communication tools.
Agree/disagree 完全1边-年轻人受谁的影响大
Some people say that young people are more influenced by their friends than parents or teachers. Agree or disagree?
It is believed that friends play a more important role in an
adolescent’s life than teachers or parents. I agree with this opinion.
The primary reason is that they share more commonalities with peers than with parents. They posss similar traits and characteristics like creativity or being driven and most of them are facing similar difficulties: the pressure of getting into a decent university , finding a promising job or the confusion about their passions or their identity. Thus, the young generation would most likely think that friends of a similar age can better appreciate their
schemer
position/stand in their shoes, providing them more practical suggestions than parents. In this ca, they tend to be more open to friends and willing to follow their advice.
Another reason is related to social and emotional perspectives. For one thing, most of young people are uncertain about many aspects in life and would worry about making mistakes. Such fear would cau them to assume that what the majority of their friends do is correct and end up imitating their thoughts and behaviour to ek a n of certainty, but they would resist copying parents due to the age gap and different exposures to life. For another, as younger people are also afraid of feeling lonely and isolated/ do not want to feel being left behind, conforming to friends’ behaviour help them get along with friends, developing a strong bond and n of belonging.
As discusd above, young people are more likely to be affected by friends than by adults due to their shared difficulties and the desire of belonging to a group and feeling assured.
Agree/disagree 完全反对-2个反对段落小朋友看电视
Children can learn effectively from watching television. Therefore, children should be encouraged to watch television regularly both at home and at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is no doubt that TV programs teach children in a more engaging manner than school class, thus facilitating their learning. Therefore, it has been suggested that children should watch TV frequently both at home and at school. However, I disagree with this statement.
疯狂英语口语版One main argument is that watching TV programs too often impairs children’s learning outcomes rather than vice versa. Admittedly, TV programs can explain complex concepts in a more attractive and simpler way, sustaining
chi ldren’s attention for extended periods. However, if TV is over exploited , children will spend less time interacting with peers and teachers and more time receiving information passively. They will be less involved in the learning process, thus quickly forgetting the knowledge learnt and conquently lack the ability to apply new skills in practice.
Another problem with excessive TV exposure are the negative impacts on children’s physical health.
Firstly, while watching TV programs , children tend to sit in one position for a long time or collap on a sofa, which can affect the development of their spines. Secondly, if they sit too clo to the television or watch TV for an extended period of time, their vision will be impaired. Lasly, children may also find TV programs so engaging that they will lo the interest in participating outdoor physical activities, increasing the risk of developing obesity and other associated conditions such as high blood pressure.
lucky意思As discusd above, I think spending a moderate amount of time watching TV once or twice a day is beneficial to children’s learning but doing it too frequently is harmful to both their studies and health.doto
Agree/disagree 禁止类-让步反驳垃圾食品的广告
Shops should not be allowed to ll any food and drinks that has been scientifically proved to be bad for people's health. To what extent do you agree or disagree
It is suggested that governments should prohibit shops from lling food and drinks that are detrimental to our health and have been approved by science. I strongly disagree with this statement.
While purchasing unhealthy food and drinks is one of the caus of people’s bad eating habits, disallowing shops to ll foods harmful to our health is unlikely to ensure healthy food choices. People may continue to adopt unhealthy eating practice : they can cook foods unhealthily such as deep frying and they may also consume an excessive amount of “ healthy” foods. In such cas, removing unhealthy foods from people’s life cannot guarantee they follow a healthy diet.
This policy is not only ineffective to stop unhealthy eating but could also lead to devastating impacts. Nearly all packaged foods contain prervatives and additives that can give ri to illness and almost all non-organic foods have been proven to shorten people’s life expectancy.If such large numbers of foods had been banned, a lot of companies and farmers producing them would be affected significantly, resulting in unemployment and
bankruptcy. What is wor, since the harm ful impacts of a lot of “unhealthy” foods are minor and even negligible, it is likely that some companies consider this policy unfair, thus developing rentment towards
legislation or protests against authorities, which may lead to social unrest.
Bad on the above evidence and analysis, it is neither effective nor realistic to prohibit the sale of
unhealthy foods. Governments should encourage the public to follow a nutrition-balanced diet through more practical alternatives.
考试培训发音翻译Agree/disagree best way 让步反驳汽油价格
The best way to solve the environmental problems is to increa the price of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is no doubt that the ever-deteriorating environment has become a huge problem in many places. Solving this problem is unlikely to need a simple ri in petrol price.
While it is undeniable that the ever-increasing car u is one of the main cau of environmental problems, higher petrol price is unlikely to significantly reduce the number of drivers. As tho who can afford a private car tends to earn a decent income, a higher expen of driving would be inefficient to motivate them giving up the convenience of driving themlves. But there are various other measures that could be taken that would have a huge effect on addressing the problems.
app store是什么A better solution to tackle with environmental pollution is to promote clean energy such as solar energy. If vehicles and factories relied on tho sources of energy, there would be less pollutants pro
duced so that the impact on air quality can be controlled to a lower level. Meanwhile, using this approach does not require individuals to give up their current habits such as driving private cars. In such ca, their quality of life will not be affected, which could ensure that a lot of people can really adopt/ follow this approach. So promoting clean energy is likely to be a more efficient solution than increasing the price of fuel.
As discusd above, although increasing the cost of fuel may lead to a decline in environmental pollution, this solution is not the best one becau not a lot of people would love to follow it. Therefore, we should ek other better solutions.
Agree/disagree only way 让步反驳
Some people think that strict punishment for driving offences is the only way to make road safer. To what extent do you agree or disagree ? Body 1 和Body 2可以合并的
It is believed that imposing vere punishment on drivers who violate traffic laws is the only viable measure for improving safety on the roads. I strongly disagree with this statement becau there are other means that can be implemented to tackle this problem.
Admittedly, punishing drivers more strictly can improve road safety. If drivers are aware that their misbehaviour will lead to significant conquences regardless of heavy penalties or imprisonment, they would be deterred from breaching related regulations. In such cas, they would feel more accountable for their behaviour and more concerned about road situations when driving, lowering the risks of accidents.
天津外语培训Nevertheless, punishment alone is unlikely to remove irresponsible driving behaviour since accidents are caud by a complex t of veral different factors . Most accidents occur due to drivers’ misperception of risks :they assume that inattentive behaviour such as consuming a small amount of alcohol or occasional answering of a call while driving will not lead to a devastating conquence. A few accidents occur due to drivers’ poor skills , causing them to react to unexpected conditions incorrectly.
Therefore, to reduce accidents on the roads, more effective measures should be taken. For example, if the government reported more incidents caud by minor act of inconsideration, drivers would be more aware of the potential risk of careless driving, thus, becoming more disciplined. Drivers should also be encouraged to equip themlves with the skills to cope with urgent problems on the road.
As discusd above, to improve road safety, imposing heavy punishments on drivers is not the only solution. It is vital for the government to u a more holistic approach to addressing this issue.
Agree/disagree 中立国际救援谁的责任
Solving environmental problems should be the responsibility
of international organisations rather than individual national government. Do you agree or disagree.
It is believed that international organisations should be responsible for addressing environmental problems with no need of the contribution fromfbi warning是什么意思
