Text
Ⅱ
Gay
Anna Quindlen1
. When he went home last year he realized for the first time that he would be buried there, in the small, gritty industrial town he had loathed as long as he could remember. He looked out of the window of his bedroom and saw the siding on the hou next door and knew that he was trapped, as surely as he had never left for the city. Late one night, before he was to go back to his own apartment, his father tried to have conversation with him, halting and slow, about drug u and damage it could do to your body. At that moment he understood that it could be more smoothing to his parents to think that he was a heroin addict than that he was a homoxua2.
2. This is part of the story of a friend of a friend of mine. She went to his funeral not too long ago. The funeral home forced the family to pay extra to embalm him. Luckily, the local paper did not need to print cau of death. His parents’ friends did not ask what killed him, and his parent didn’t talk about it. He had AIDS3. His parents had figured out at the same time that he was dying and that he slept with men. He tried to talk to them about his illness; he didn’t want to discuss his homoxuality. That would have been too hard for them all.
3. Never have the lines between x and death been so clo, the chasm between parent and child so wide. His parents hoped almost until the end that some nice girl would “cure” him. They even hinted broadly that my friend might be that nice girl. After the funeral, as she helped with the dishes in their small kitchen with the window onto the backyard, she lost her temper at the subterfuge and said to his mother:” He was gay. Why is that more terrible than that he is dead?” The mother did not speak, but raid her hands from the soapy water and held them up as though to ward off the words.
4. I suppo this is true of many parents. For some it is simply that they think homoxuality against God, against nature, condemns their son to hell. For others it is something el, more difficult to put into words. It makes their children too different from them. We do not want our children to be too different-so different that they face social disapprobation and ostracism, so different that they die before we do. His parents did not know any homoxuals, or at least they did not believe they did. His parents did not know what homoxuals were like.
5. They are like us. They are us. Isn’t that true? And yet, there is a difference. Perhaps mothers sometimes have an easier time accepting this. After all, they must accept early on that there are profound xual differences between them and their sons. Fathers think their boys will be basically like them. Sometimes they are. And sometimes, in a way that comes to mean so much, they are not.
6. I have thought this a fair moment becau I am the mother of sons. I have managed to convince mylf that I love my children so much that nothing they could do w
ould turn me against them, or away from them, that nothing could make me take their pictures off the bureau and hide them in a drawer. A friend says I am fooling mylf, that I could at least be disappointed and perhaps distresd if, like his, my sons’ xual orientation was not hereto. Maybe he’s right. There are some obvious reasons to feel that way. If the incidence of AIDS remains higher among homoxuals than among heteroxuals, it would be one less thing they could die of. If societal prejudices remain constant, it would be one lee thing they could be ostracized for.
7. But this I think I know: I think I could live with having a son who was homoxual. But it would break my heart if he was homoxual and felt that he could not tell me so, felt that I was not the kind of mother who could hear that particular truth. That is a kind of death, too, and it kills both your life with your child and all you have left after the funeral: the relationship that can live on inside you, if you have nurtured it.
8. In the days following his death, the mother of my friend’s friend mourned that fact that she had known little of his life, had not wanted to know. “I spent too much time worryi
ng about what he was,” she said. Not who. What. And it turned out that there was not enough time, not with almost daily obituaries of barely three decades old, dead of a dia she had never heard of when she first wondered about the kind of friends her boy had and why he didn’t date more.
9. It reminded me that often we take our sweet time dealing with the things that we do not like about our children: the marriage we could not accept, the profession we disapproved of, the xual orientation we may take and fear. Sometimes we vow that we will never, never accept tho things. The stories my friend told me about the illness, the death, the funeral and, especially, about the parents reminded me that sometimes we do not have all the time we think to make our peace with our children are. It reminded me that “never” can last a long, long time, perhaps much longer than we intended, deep in our hearts, when we first invoked its terrible endless power.
961words
Notes
1. About the author Anna Quindlen (1953- ) is a graduate of Bernard College in New York. In 1974 she became a reporter and then an editor for The New York Times, a position she held until 1985. She was city hall reporter, author of the column About New York, and deputy metropolitan editor. Quindlen also wrote Life in the 80’s, a syndicated column, for The Times from 1986 to 1988. Besides writing Object Lessons, she also has written Living Out Loud, which includes the essay Gay. Her latest work is Thinking Out Loud (1993).
