我的偶像曹操英文作文200词
Some people often say that Cao Cao is a traitor, but I don't think so.
People all praid Zhugeliang for his resourcefulness, Liu Bei for his love and righteousness, Guan Feichang for his calmness, and Zhang Fei for his courage and directness. Now, I want to prai Cao Cao.
People say that Cao Cao is crafty, but I don't think so.
At the end of the Eastern Han Dynasty, the monarch was incompetent, the country declined, and the war continued. In an age of intrigue and deception, Cao Cao had no choice but to survive.
As for holding the emperor to order the princes, it was just a strategic measure of Cao Cao. The author himlf imagines that if he was born in such a troubled time, he would rather choo to be a overlord and achieve a career than place hope on a dying corrupt and incompetent government. Moreover, just as Cao Cao said: if he had not taken the emperor
as his hostage to order the princes, I do not know how many people in the Central Plains would dominate and how many people would become emperors, and when the chaos would cea. The whole history of the Three Kingdoms lasted about 100 years, but it was only 20 or 30 years before and after the era of real turmoil. Although it was divided into the Three Kingdoms, people's lives were relatively stable. In contrast, in the famous periods of the southern and Northern Dynasties and the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms in Chine history, civil unrest lasted for more than a hundred years, and the flames of war were incessant, even better than tho in the Three Kingdoms period. In fact, in the early Three Kingdoms period, the princes dominated the country, and the domestic turmoil was far more chaotic than that in the Warring States period. Without Cao Cao's holding the emperor to order the princes, this kind of turmoil could not be controlled. Therefore, Cao Cao's holding the emperor to make the princes not only is not a crime, but also is a credit to the people.
At the same time, as a overlord of princes, Cao Cao's arrogance was not en, but his literary spirit was pressing. Cao Cao is a famous litterateur in Chine history. He is "an o
ld hero who has a great ambition, and a martyr in his twilight years with great ambition". Not to mention his own achievements in poetry, lyrics and Fu, he promoted national integration and adopted a ries of major policies to return Wenji to Khan, which could not be compared with other overlords in the Three Kingdoms period. Even after the defeat, Zhugeliang, who is famous in history, and Zhou Yu, a young hero known as Guqu zhoulang, left veral poems and works? Except for killing veral literati (such as Kongrong) for political reasons, Cao Cao was extremely tolerant of the gentry and never percuted literati talents. Otherwi, there would be no Jian'an ven sons. He killed Kongrong and others becau they hindered their political aspirations, not becau they were too loyal to the emperor, but becau they could not tolerate him. Political struggle is a life and death struggle. Is it true that only Cao Cao has ever done such bloody political repression in history? Not to mention something too far away, do we still know little about this kind of political repression in the recent history of one or two hundred years? I am afraid the struggles are more cruel than Cao Cao. Why is Cao Cao so harsh? On the contrary, Cao Cao was very fond of and tolerant of talented people. The lo
ve for Guan Yu and Zhao Yun, the necessity to kill Chen Gong, and the pain to kill Ju Fu all show Cao Cao's love for talent. Opponents of Cao Cao said that all this was hypocrisy. However, Yuan Shao, Zhang Lu, Sun Quan and many other people in history could not do such a preten. Liu Bei was crying. I believe people can e the truth and falhood. Moreover, in the age of Zhugeliang, the number of talents that could be left behind in Shu was very small.
This is a generation of heroes, my idol - Cao Cao.
