Office of Environmental Health and Safety
atp结构简式Annual Growing Area Review
PREPARED BY: Jean Snyder
AREA: Drayton Harbor
YEAR ENDING: December 31, 2014
化妆舞会英语CLASSIFICATION:Conditionally Approved, Prohibited
Activities in the Growing Area in 2014水调歌头歌曲原唱
The Drayton Harbor Growing Area was sampled 11 times in 2014. Nine sampling events occurred in the Open status, which meets the minimum standards in accordance with the NSSP Systematic Random Sampling method. Marine stations 378, 4, 6, and 8 were not sampled on July 17, 2014 due to lab issues and Station 12 was not sampled on August 12, 2014 due to a mislabled sample bottle. The growing area was clod during January, November and December.
Whatcom County Public Works received two EPA National Estuary Program PIC grants for work in the Drayton Harbor watershed. In addition, the Whatcom Clean Water Program received EPA, National Estuary Program funding for ongoing work in the Drayton Harbor watershed. The Drayton Harbor Shellfish Protection District Advisory Committee continues to meet and investigate non-point sources in the area.
Analytical Results Of Water Samples意大利文化
Tables 1 shows the unsorted marine water data for the last 30 samples collected from the area. Tables 2 and 3 show opened and clod period data, respectively, bad on the same date range. This summary shows that all stations in Conditionally Approved area meet the Approved water quality standard when the area is in Open status and are impacted but improving during the Clod period. Station 6 is “Concerned” with a 90th percentile of 21.6 FC/100mL.
Change In Actual Pollution Sources That Impact The Growing Area
We currently have no information indicating that the area has changes in sources of pollution. Classification Status
Well within the classification standards
Meets standards, but some concerns
Meets standards, but threatened with downgrade in classification
Fails to meet current classification standards
Office of Environmental Health and Safety
Annual Growing Area Review
Remarks and Recommendations
Pollution source investigations should continue in the Drayton Harbor watershed.
苿莉花Management Plan Evaluation:
1. Have all parties involved complied with the conditions of the management plan .......... Y es
允许近义词2. Has reporting been adequate to manage the conditional area ......................................... Y es
3. Does the area consistently meet approved area criteria when it is open for harvest ....... Y es
哈塔瑜伽
4. Has a field inspection of critical pollution sources been conducted ............................... Y es
TABLE 1.
Unsorted Data Summary of Marine Stations in Drayton Harbor Growing Area
Tides Included: ALL Sampling Event Type: Regulatory
Maximum Number of Samples:30
The standard for approved shellfish growing waters is fecal coliform geometric mean not greater than 14 organisms / 100 mL with an estimated 90th percentile not greater than 43 organisms / 100 mL. The above table shows bacteriological results in relation to program standards.
* N/A – SRS criteria require a minimum of 30 samples from each station. *
TABLE 2
Data Summary of the Marine Stations during Open Status: February – October
The standard for approved shellfish growing waters is fecal coliform geometric mean not greater than 14 organisms / 100 mL with an estimated 90th percentile not greater than 43 organisms / 100 mL. The above table shows bacteriological results in relation to program standards.
* N/A – SRS criteria require a minimum of 30 samples from each station. *
TABLE 3
Data Summary of the Marine Stations during Clod Status:
January, November and December
The standard for approved shellfish growing waters is fecal coliform geometric mean not greater than 14 organisms / 100 mL with an estimated 90th percentile not greater than 43 organisms / 100 mL. The above table shows bacteriological results in relation to program standards.
* N/A – SRS criteria require a minimum of 30 samples from each station.末世纪的呼声
