Many people believe that scientific rearch should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies.幼时记趣文言文翻译
益肺止咳胶囊
热销平板电脑Sample Answer:咱们班
脊椎变直 Instead of being conducted by private companies, important scientific rearch must be managed and administered by the governments, according to the opinions of many. I personally believe that private companies should be given their own freedom in doing rearch, but with sufficient and proper monitoring from the government. On one hand, it is true that scientific rearch should not be only conducted by the government. The main reason is that the scope of scientific rearch is diver and wide, and private companies could cover up some rearch which is not carried out by the governments. Many private institutions or individuals' discoveries are uful for the humanity, as we can learn from the past. For example, Thomas Alva Edison was an individual inventor who has greatly contributed to the world with his inventions such as the bulb light, motion pictures, phonograph and so on. We should notice that the invention was not the main focus of the
深度清理手机内存government’s rearch during that time, and thanks to Edison we have electric light today. On the other hand, although private companies are given the right to do scientific rearch, they must be strictly monitored by the governments. They must be controlled, as some of them might be doing it for their monetary gain or for destructive weapons. For example, some companies might focus on developing biochemical weapons, and it could threaten the world peace. It is the governments’ job to prevent and block the kinds of rearch. In conclusion, I do not agree that scientific rearch should only be conducted by the governments. It is a fact that the scope of scientific rearch is huge. Therefore private companies should be allowed in doing rearch. However, I do agree the rearch that is done by private companies must be reviewed, and monitored by the governments in order to avoid any misappropriation.
怎么吸引女生
