GRE写作范文：法律的灵活性
题目：
Laws should not be stationary and fixed. Instead, they should be flexible
enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
法律不应该是僵化或固定的，而应该根据不同的环境、时期和地点而充足灵活。
一什么知秋
正文：
Should laws be stable and fixed or be flexible in taking consideration of
various factors such as circumstances, times and places? The speaker concludes
that instead of being stationary, laws should be constantly changing. The
speaker’s claim have merit s in declaring that law should be flexible enough to实训报告心得体会
take account of various circumstances since adaptation to changing social
environment is how the law properly guard the function of social engine and the
general welfare of people as a whole. But to some extent, we would not go too
精思
永无止境是什么意思much in neglecting to importance of the stability of laws becau they are the
principles we adhere to in our daily life, if changed too abruptly and冒险的英语
constantly, will result in egregious chaos and confusion.
Keeping stability, consistency of laws is indispensable in helping people
to make prediction of the conquence of their behaviors and figure out the
legal obligation and rights exerted upon them by the legal system. In the
银行合规演讲稿
personal level, consistency of laws defines the properness and legality of their
doings and thus endows people with n of curity and good citizenship. If as
the speaker claimed that laws should never be stationary or fixed, people face
the threat of being constantly threw into turbid mud of bewilderment and
incurity and finally lo their sight in how to adapt to sudden alternation of
in this aspect or another.孔子嫡孙
Another example that aptly illustrates this is in the field of business. As
we know, the ultimate goal of a business is to maximize its profit of
shareholders within the framework of laws to define that a enterpris function
within this framework, obey its obligation and hamper no interest of the general
welfare of the society. In order for a enterpris to thrive, it must carefully
study the relevant business laws, including anti-dumping law and torts,
etc.Given the choice, most leaders are unwilling to e the prospect that laws
are constantly changing since it takes time and effort to build a well-defined福建老家
frames within companies and overthrow established practice and code would demand
another round of revising
