经济发展与环境保护英文辩论赛
Which should receive priority in china, economic growth or environmental protection？ Theoretical cliché
正方一辩：从人类发展的终极目标看，我们要彻底地解决环境问题，必须要标本 兼治。要治本，必须优先发展经济，从根本上优化经济结构堵住产生环境问 题的源头，要治标，同样要优先发展经济，为解决眼前的环境问题提供技术、 资金等支持，只有这样，才能为人类生存和发展提供环境保障。Honorable judges, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen. From the ultimate goal of human development, we need to address both the symptoms and root caus to solve the environmental problems thoroughly. To effect a permanent cure, we must give first priority to the development of economy, and optimize the economic structure fundamentally to block the source of the environment problems；To take temporary solution， we also should give priority to the development of economy, so that we have the technology, capital and other supports for solving the environmental problems. Only in this way can environment protection be provided for human survival and development.
反方一辩：经济发展是指社会能够提供丰裕的商品来改善人类的物质生活,环境 保护则是采取一定的政策措施来保护生态平衡。经济要发展意味着企业需要 更多的厂房与原材料来保障商品的供应党风廉政会议记录>潇潇雨未歇——那便存在一个问题：自然分给人 类的土地与原材料是有限,经济优先发展就一定会侵占原本不属于人类的自 然资源。Honorable judges, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen .The economic development refers to society can provide abundant commodity to improve human material life; environmental protection is to take certain policy measures to protect the ecological balance. economic development means that companies need more workshop and raw materials to ensure the supply of goods——then there is a problem, that is nature land and raw materials to human is limited, economic priority development will occupy nature resources which originally do not belong to the human.
二辩盘问简报格式范文嗔目结舌 Two debate questioned
反方二辩：请问对方一辩，经济是一时之事，环境是万代之事，哪个重要？经济 发展慢了，人们还可以吃到饭，环境没了，还能生存吗？ My fellow debaters ，plea allow me
to ask. The economy is the temporary matter, but the environment is of the ten thousand generation, which one is more important? When Economic develops slowly, people can also eat rice; how can we still survive if there is no environment.
正方一辩：不好意思对方辩友，恐怕我们今天讨论的重点是优先权。并不是说经 济优先就不搞环保了，只是环保处于较次的位置，跟中国现状一样，政策虽 然说要重视环保，但一般县区还是经济发展优先的，也就有资本的大城市才 比较重视搞环保，相信大家心知肚明 Sorry, I'm afraid the key points we debate today are the right of priority. Economy development first does not mean totally ignore the environmental protection, the environmental protection is just in the inferior position .Just like the prent China, although the policy attach great importance to environmental protection, economic development receive priority in the general counties, there is only capital cities would likely take it riously to environmental protection, everybody know it in our own heart.
反方二辩：请问正方三辩，如果发展经济优先的话，很可能造成环境成本大于经 济效益的情况，这样的经济是发展还是倒退？ Excu me, my fellow debaters. If economic develop
ment receives priority then it is likely the environmental costs to be larger than the economic efficiency, such economy develops or backs up?
正方三辩： 这种情况确实有存在， 罗伯特英文但并不是每时每刻都存在。 志愿者的精神各个行业情况不同， 我们不能以偏概全。但按你的意思，这种情况下经济效益是负的，那我们改 行环境保护优先，就能转亏为盈？我不这么觉得。 To cau this kind of situation is there truly, but not every moment. The situation in each industry is different; we cannot draw conclusions from one part. But according to your point, in this ca the economic benefit is negative, then if we changed environment first, we can turn it into profit? I don't think so.
正方二辩： 我们知道环境的保护是预防为主，防治结合，而预防和治理都要依 靠技术的发展，那请问对方一辩，如果没有强有力的经济基础支持科学技术 发展，那么以科技为支撑的环保从何谈起呢？丰田iq We know that the protection of the environment is mainly prevention, and we should combine prevention with treatment, and the prevention and control depends on the development of technology, then my fellow debaters, if there is no strong economic basis for science and technology development, then don’t mention the environmental protection supported by the science and technology.
反方一辩：你的问题未免抽象了点。科技发展无止尽，经济发展也没尽头，什么 时候算得上是“强有力”呢？但是环境保护是迫在眉睫，耽误不起。参桂鹿茸丸 Your question is a little abstract. Science and technology develops endlessly, so do economic development, when will it be considered as “strong"? But environmental protection is imminent, which can't afford to delay.
正方二辩：请问反方三辩，经济发展是让人们享受到丰富的生活内容，包括衣食 住行娱乐，这难道不是现在社会上人们的普遍愿望吗？ Excu me, my fellow debaters. The responsibility of economic development is to let people enjoy a rich life, including the basic necessities and entertainment, isn't it now the people's universal desire?
反方三辩：人们喜欢的期望的不一定都是好的。我相信，人们更倾向于在一个既 能享受到生活乐趣，同时又是一个健康和谐自然的环境中生存。 People’s expectation is not necessarily that good. I believe that people tend to live in a life of happiness, and at the same time, survive in a healthy and harmonious natural environment
