晚清史As the world hurtles towards the end of the cond millennium,there ems to be an incread awareness of mysticism and things spiritual.Suddenly,it's hip to believe in God(not necessarily a specific god—an amorphous,non-denominational deity will do,an afterlife,and,of cour,angels. The entertainment industry,never one to be left out on any trend,has thrown itlf headlong into this one.On TV,the cloying"Touched by an Angel"is a hit—a mainstay of many people's Sunday night viewing plans.And the movies have jumped on the bandwagon,too,giving us enough celestial beings in the last few years to crowd the head of a pin—Michael,The Preacher's Wife,Wide Awake,and now City of Angels.Add films that feature Satan and his minions(like Devil's Advocate and Fallen)or less well-defined issues of ,Contact and The Sweet Hereafter),and this list of titles explodes. Most American-made motion pictures bad on foreign originals tend to be huge disappointments.I could probably name15or20examples,but I'll confine mylf to two obvious ones:The Vanishing and Diaboliq ue,both of which were so bad that they were insulting.There have been exceptions,of cour,The Birdcage was an enjoyable Americanization of La Cage aux Folles.Sommersby did some interesting things with The Return of Martin Guerre.And now City of Angels has effectively re-worked(rather than re-made)Wim Wenders'1988art-hou classic,Wings of Desire,by taking away some of the earlier film's more med itative elements and deepening the romantic aspect.The ending is completely,and surprisingly,different.杠铃
陈子云
美羊羊卡丁车
孔子教学
City of Angels is bad,not unexpected ly,in Los Angeles,which here is a literal"City of Angels", with the invisible celestial agents sitting high atop billboards and skyscrapers.Dresd like Heaven's Men in Black,the angels are an odd bunch.They spend their days and nights obrving and occasionally offering comfort to lect humans.They cannot touch,taste,or smell.They are immortal and ethereal.They live in a library and spend time at the beach in a kind of wordless communion. Seth(Nicolas Cage)is just one of many angels assigned to Los Angeles.But,unlike most of his brethren,he has a strong desire to experience what it's like to be human.He ems to share the ntiment of a comment that he relates to fellow angel Cassiel(Andre Braugher):"What good would wings be if you could n't feel the wind on your face?"One day,Seth is in a hospital to guide a dying man to the next life.His attention is captured by the determination of a doctor,Maggie Rice(Meg Ryan),to save the patient's life.Later,he returns with the intention of soothing Maggie's distress,but it proves to be a difficult task.Soon,he is spending hours on end watching her,eventually revealing himlf as a benevolent stranger.Seth has fallen in love with Maggie,but he thinks it's a doomed proposition until an angel-turned-human(Denis Franz)reveals that God gives all of his creations free will,and,if Seth wants it enough,he can shed his wings for a human body.But,just becau Seth loves Maggie,there's no guarantee that she will reciprocate his feelings,and if he gives up his immortality for a romantic illusion,what then?
空调安装方法When it comes to heavenly matters,City of Angels doesn't offer any particular insights.The movie does not ponder the meaning of life;rather,it shamelessly celebrates the human experience by demonstrating the monotony of endless voyeurism.On a somewhat less-intellectual level,it's also about sacrifice.But the film doesn't thrive on ideas alone(if it tried,it would be in trouble,since it's not that deep).Solid acting and positive chemistry are critical to City of Angels'success.
寿星Nicolas Cage is fine as Seth,although there are times when he doesn't quite fit into the angel's shoes. Cage is good as the detached obrver,watching and waiting,but there's a quality of child like innocence to Seth that he doesn't quite pull off.There's a scene in City of Angels that is pretty much lifted from It's a Wonderful Life,and it illustrates how much more convincing James Stewart was. Meg Ryan,as always,is delightful and ebullient as Maggie.This is a ca of perfect casting--I can only think of a few other actress who are as good as Ryan in this kind of role.Her range--despair
and hope,pain and rapture—places her work in City of Angels alongside that in Prelude to a Kiss and Courage Under Fire as proof that she is a capable,well-rounded dramatic talent.Meanwhile,in a supporting role(the one essayed by Peter Falk in Wings of Desire and its quel,Faraway So Clo),scene-stealing Denis Franz is delightful as the king of hedonism.
迎新海报
I suspect City of Angels is going to remind many viewers of Ghost,but there's a big difference:this film is more true and less manipulative.(In tone,although not necessarily in content,it reminded me of Truly Madly Deeply.)Ultimately,it is a tear-jerker,but there's more to it than that.While the movie isn't as effective as Wings of Desire in developing the angels'culture and prenting a med itation upon spirituality,it gives us a pair of well-developed protagonists worth caring about and establishes a complex dynamic between them.City of Angels is more romantic than profound,but Dana Stevens' script is thoughtful and intelligent,and I never felt insulted by what the characters say,do,or think. Director Brad Silberling,who previously made another supernatural tale,the live-action Casper, effectively suggests the spiritual/material duality of the world.It's a subdued motion picture,but the lack of overt melodrama makes for a moving and involving story.Even for tho enraptured by Wings of Desire,City of Angels is strong enough to cast its own quietly romantic spell.
