This ca’s name is Toyosaburo Korematsu v. United States. The two parties are Toyosaburo Korematsu and United States. It is a constitutional ca. The ca was decided by US Supreme Court on Dce. 18,1944. The citation is 323 U.S. 214(1944). The petitioner was convicted in a federal district court. Then the Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed, then the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed. It is an appellate court decision. This ca was decided during the World War 2. The legal issue is whether it is OK to exclude the Japane in time of war. I think it’s OK. The rule is that it is legal to exclude the minority in the time of war.
解比Mr. Justice Black delivered the opinion of the court. He thought that the exclusion from a threatened area has a clo relationship to the prevention of espionage and sabotage, and there were disloyal members of the population, who number could not be preci ascertained.山什么水什么
傅雷家书名句Mr. Justice Murphy is disnting. He thought that all residents are a part of the new and distinct civilization of the United States, so they must be treated at all times as the heirs of the American experiment and as entitled to all the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the c
onstitution. Mr. Justice Jackson is also disnting. He thought that a civil court cannot be made to enforce an order which violates constitutional limitations even if it is a reasonable exerci of military authority.
I agree with Justice Black's 个人简历特长opinion, I believe that freedom of the minority should be able常识题 to make some sacrifice of national sovereignty in time of war, and, of cour, not 喝金银花水禁忌to make婴儿餐椅 such acts becau of racial discrimination.
景翳翳以将入
