CHAPTER 10 MANAGEMENT OF TRANSLATION EXPOSURE
SUGGESTED ANSWERS AND SOLUTIONS TO END-OF-CHAPTER
QUESTIONS AND PROBLEMS程度的意思
滴答吉他QUESTIONS
1. Explain the difference in the translation process between the monetary/nonmonetary method and the temporal method.
Answer: Under the monetary/nonmonetary method, all monetary balance sheet accounts of a foreign subsidiary are translated at the current exchange rate. Other balance sheet accounts are translated at the historical rate exchange rate in effect when the account was first recorded. Under the temporal method, monetary accounts are translated at the current exchange rate. Other balance sheet accounts are also translated at the current rate, if they are carried on the books at current value. If they are carried at historical value, they are translated at the rate in effect on the date the item was put on the books. Since fixed ast
护士长个人总结>半个月亮爬上来s and inventory are usually carried at historical costs, the temporal method and the monetary/nonmonetary method will typically provide the same translation.
2. How are translation gains and loss handled differently according to the current rate method in parison to the other three methods, that is, the current/noncurrent method, the monetary/nonmonetary method, and the temporal method?
左手掌心有痣
Answer: Under the current rate method, translation gains and loss are handled only as an adjustment to net worth through an equity account named the “cumulative translation adjustment〞 account. Nothing pass through the ine statement. The other three translation methods pass foreign exchange gains or loss through the ine statement before they enter on to the balance sheet through the accumulated retained earnings account.
3. Identify some instances under FASB 52 when a foreign entity’s functional currency would be the same as the parent firm’s currency.
Answer: Three examples under FASB 52, where the foreign entity’s functional currency will be the same as the parent firm’s currency, are: i) the foreign entity’s cash flows directly affect the parent’s cash flows and are readily available for remittance to the parent firm; ii) the sales prices for the foreign entity’s products are responsive on a short-term basis to exchange rate changes, where sales prices are determined through worldwide petition; and, iii) the sales market is primarily located in the parent’s country or sales contracts are denominated in the parent’s currency.
飘飘悠悠
4. Describe the remeasurement and translation process under FASB 52 of a wholly owned affiliate that keeps its books in the local currency of the country in which it operates, which is different than its functional currency.
Answer: For a foreign entity that keeps its books in its local currency, which is different from its functional currency, the translation process according to FASB 52 is to: first, remeasure the financial reports from the local currency into the functional currency using the temporal method of translation, and cond, translate from the functional currency into the reporting currency using the current rate method of translation.
5. It is, generally, not possible to pletely eliminate both translation exposure and transaction exposure. In some cas, the elimination of one exposure will also eliminate the other. But in other cas, the elimination of one exposure actually creates the other. Discuss which exposure might be viewed as the most important to effectively manage, if a conflict between controlling both aris. Also, discuss and critique the mon methods for controlling translation exposure.
Answer: Since it is, generally, not possible to pletely eliminate both transaction and translation exposure, we remend that transaction exposure be given first priority since it involves real cash flows. The translation process, on-the-other hand, has no direct effect on reporting currency cash flows, and will only have a realizable effect on net investment upon the sale or liquidation of the asts.
There are two mon methods for controlling translation exposure: a balance sheet hedge and a derivatives hedge. The balance sheet hedge involves equating the amount of expo
d asts in an exposure currency with the expod liabilities in that currency, so the net exposure is zero. Thus when an exposure currency exchange rate changes versus the reporting currency, the change in asts will offt the change in liabilities. To create a balance sheet hedge, once transaction exposure has been controlled, often means creating new transaction exposure. This is not wi since real cash flow loss can result. A derivatives hedge is not really a hedge, but rather a speculative position, since the size of the “hedge〞 is bad on the future expected spot rate of exchange for the exposure currency with the reporting currency. If the actual spot rate differs from the expected rate, the “hedge〞 may result in the loss of real cash flows.
