ISSUE3 It is more important to allocate money for immediate, existing social problems than to spend it on long-term rearch that might help future generation.
Shall we give priority to immediate, existing social problems rather than to long-term rearch that is highly possible to help future generation? The speaker asrts that the importance of the former is definitely overwhelms that of the latter. Holding different views, the money spent on immediate, existing social problems is as esntial as on long-term rearch.
如何带好团队Admittedly, emergencies in modern society are worthy our attentions and money. It is not hard to imagine the vere result if we neglect the immediate, existing social problems. Influenza A (H1N1), which is one of the most critical problems in the world, rais the most attentions. Since it is found, every country tries their best efforts to stop it from spreading, and allocate a great deal of money on the study of the vaccine of it. If the government spends most money on long-term rearch, instead of helping the off-spring, the problems caud by influenza A (H1N1) might counteract the potential benefit brought by long-term st
热爱英语
udy. Immediate problems are always associated with the stability of the society, such as unemployment rate, crime rate, economy recession and so on. Without a stable environment, the study for future generation is like a hou has no foundation.
怎么哄老婆
Rearch t on long-term goals, which is emly ambiguous and uless now, is equally esntial to human beings. Studies on mathematics, physics and chemistry, without further analysis, look much less practically and beneficial. On the contrary, the studies are the foundation of other rearch, such as astronomy, mechanics and medicine. Without the time, money, perspiration spent on the basic study, there will never be breakthrough in any other fields. Without the telescope in the early form invented by Galileo, the achievement of astronomy will be put off for decades. Without Newton's Three Laws of Motion, the success of modern transportation will not come so soon. Without the study on penicillin by Fleming, we might take more years to study on antibiotic.
Neither of them can be overlooked, and what we can do is to approach the balance betw
位梦华
een both of them. Society is just like a growing child, he should learn to solve the immediate problems and accumulate knowledge to get prepared for challenges in the future. If he pays no attentions to existing problems, there will be more problems caud by existing ones. If he only focus his attentions on immediate problems, there will no progress in his future. To build a healthy and strong society, which is like raising child, requires us to take care of the existing and future problems.寒假生活手抄报
八字查五行
国际俱乐部In sum, the speaker, to some extent, fails to take into account the potential importance of long-term problems. In order to maintain the stability and advancement of our society, the immediate, existing problems and long-term rearches should be put on the same level. Otherwi, the cost caud by our remiss is out of our reach.