诚信主题英文演讲稿范文5篇推荐
诚信英文演讲稿篇一
一个字的网名
Ladies and Gentlemen: My topic is Honesty.美国权利法案
As a correspondent of the Qingdao Morning News, I visited Dr. James Gilman, the President of the International Committee for Marco Polo Studies in England. In this picture, this is James, and this is me and we are looking at a dragon s tooth. This is a true story.
65 years ago, James lived in Qingdao. Then he was only 5 years old. He often visited the Aquarium and was fascinated by a creature on display there, which he thought was a dragon. He was afraid of its sharp teeth and wanted one to keep as a treasure.
饥荒教程 In the late 1930s, when the Japane occupied Qingdao, his family had to leave. On his last day in Qingdao, he ran to the Aquarium and pulled out one of the teeth from the dragon s mouth.
柳树开花
He kept the tooth for the next 65 years, but the feeling of guilt at having stolen it was there in the background all through his life. It was always on his conscience, and the feeling intensified as he became older. Finally he decided to put right his childish error. In 2002, he visited Qingdao and returned it to the Aquarium with his sincere apologies. He received a warm welcome.
When James visited Qingdao, I accompanied him all the time and reported on his visit. I was deeply touched by his honesty. It has taught me a lot. I think to err is human. The important thing is to have the courage to admit and correct one s error.
Honesty is a vital quality of human behaviour. So we should try to keep an honest mind in everything we say and do. I would like to say to all of my friends: Let s be honest people of good moral character.
吴柳波
关于龙的成语 Thank you.
诚信英文演讲稿篇二
Since the quality of honesty applies to all behaviors, one cannot refu to consider factual information, for example, in an unbiad manner and still claim that one s knowledge, belief or position is an attempt to be truthful. Such a belie
f is clearly a product of one s desires and simply has nothing to do with the human ability to know. Basing one s positions on what one wants rather than unbiad evidence gathering is dishonest even when good intentions can be cited after all even Hitler could cite good intentions and intended glory for a lect group of people. Clearly then, an unbiad approach to the truth is a requirement of honesty.
Becau intentions are cloly related to fairness and certainly affect the degree of honesty/dishonesty, there is a wide spread confusion about honesty--and a general belief that being dishonest means that one ALWAYS correctly understands if their behavior is either honest or dishonest. Self-perception of our morality is non-static and volatile. It s often at the moment we refu to consider other perspectives that there is a clear indication we are not pursuing the truth, rather than simply and exclusively at the moment
we can muster up evidence that we are right. Socrates had much to say about truth, honesty and morality, and explained that if people really understood that their behavior was wrong then they simply wouldn t do it by definition. Unfortunately, honesty in the western tradition has been marginalized to specific instances perhaps becau a thorough understanding of honesty collides with ideologies of all types. Ideologies and idealism often exaggerate and suppress evidence in order to support their perspectives at the eXPen of the truth. This process erodes the practice and understanding of honesty. To an ideologist the truth quite often becomes insignificant, what matters most are their ideals and what ever supports their desires to enjoy and spread tho ideals.
Human beings are inherently biad about what they believe to be good due to individual tastes backgrounds, but once one understands that a decidedly biad approach to what is true is inherently dishonest, one can also understand how idealism and ideology have poorly rved the quest for an honest, moral society. Both honesty and morality require that we ba our opinions about what is good upon unbiad ideas of what is TRUE rather than vice versa (determining what is true bad on what we feel is good) the way a
ll ideologies would have us believe.
诚信英文演讲稿篇三
since the quality of honesty applies to all behaviors, one cannot refu to consider factual information, for example, in an unbiad manner and still claim that one s knowledge, belief or position is an attempt to be truthful. such a belief is clearly a product of one s desires and simply has nothing to do with the human ability to know. basing one s positions on what one wants rather than unbiad evidence gathering is dishonest even when good intentions can be cited after all even hitler could cite good intentions and intended glory for a lect group of people. clearly then, an unbiad approach to the truth is a requirement of honesty.
怎样设置主页
becau intentions are cloly related to fairness and certainly affect the degree of honesty/dishonesty, there is a wide spread confusion about honesty--and a general belief that being dishonest means that one always correctly understands if their behavior is either honest or dishonest. lf-perception of our morality is non-static and volatile. it s oft
手机内存怎么看en at the moment we refu to consider other perspectives that there is a clear indication we are not pursuing the truth, rather than simply and exclusively at the moment we can muster up evidence that we are right. socrates had much to say about truth, honesty and morality, and explained that if people really understood that their behavior was wrong then they simply wouldn t do it by definition. unfortunately, honesty in the western tradition has been marginalized to specific instances perhaps becau a thorough understanding of honesty collides with ideologies of all types. ideologies and idealism often exaggerate and suppress evidence in order to support their perspectives at the expen of the truth. this process erodes the practice and understanding of honesty. to an ideologist the truth quite often becomes insignificant, what matters most are their ideals and what ever supports their desires to enjoy and spread tho ideals.
