The major cau of the escalating tensions糯米牙.个人学习总结
Uruguay think there are two caus of the escalating tensions.
Firstly, some country's offensive containment policy towards D.P.R.K should be responsible for the crisis mostly.Affected by new conrvatism,some countrys took strong mistrust of D.P.R.K and clod the door for dialogue with D.P.R.K.They even declared the D.P.R.K to be part of an "axis of evil"
Secondly, D.P.R.K's nuclear brinkmanship is the direct fu of crisis.It is a dangerous path to ek its own absolute curity and to modify the relationship with US. From an international perspective, a North Korean regime with control of nuclear weapons is highly dangerous.
The necessity of DPRK returning to six party talks
Launched in 2003 as an informal multilateral mechanism for tackling the Korean nuclear issue, the SPT has facilitated negotiations aimed at the denuclearization of the Korean peni
nsula.Although it has not solved the nuclear problem, after six rounds of formal talks and numerous meetings among chairmen of the delegations during the five years between August 2003 and December 2008, the SPT has succeeded in making a lot of achievements.Since having the talks stalled is not in any of the party’s interests,efforts aimed at kick starting them have been underway. the SPT is the only feasible option acceptable to all.whatever the talks may achieve in the long run, their early resumption is in line with the national interests of all the parties involved at this very nsitive stage.
The appropriate solutions to DPRK's nuclear issue 阴阳割昏晓
考研单科线
Uruguay believes that firstly,sanctions are important tools for finding a comprehensive solution to a problem In order for the dialogue to be effective, there has to be pressure at the same time. That is the very reason that we should have robust resolution.北大退档
Secondly,Sanctions are not an end in themlves, and Security Council resolutions cannot fundamentally resolve the nuclear issue on the Korean peninsula.Sanctions should be a new starting point, paving the way for a political ttlement of the nuclear iss
ue on the Korean peninsula.
Imposing more sanctions to DPRK.
The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea’s obssive pursuit of weapons of mass destruction not only cau profound suffering for the people of North Korea, but also pos an extraordinary and growing threat to peace and curity on the peninsula and in the region and the world.
Our collective curity demands that we stop North Korea from continuing along this destructive and destabilizing cour.Previous multilateral efforts have undoubtedly made it more difficult for North Korea to advance its weapons programmes, the regime continues to plough ahead That is why the resolution we have to impo more sanctions to DPRK.
Forcing DPRK return to葡萄糖 Korean War Armistice Agreement
The Korean War Armistice Agreement is the accord maintaining stability on the Korean P
eninsula. Although the agreement has not been viewed as a satisfactory solution over the decades, it has largely rved the purpo of ceasing military operations, maintaining the status quo of the military demarcation line and creating peace in the context of confrontation.
危险房屋鉴定标准The armistice agreement was maintained as the countries concerned had long bid farewell to their wartime relations.
But the agreement have not been ttled as a peaceful ttlement of the Korean question.a peace accord is both necessary and inevitable to shape lasting peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula.
Discussing the peaceful u of nuclear technology
lt is virtually unlimited potential to u Nuclear power as a clean energy.For developing countries, the rights of peaceful u of nuclear energy is inalienable, nuclear safety should also be the first priority.This is not only refers to the safety of their u of nuclear e
nergy, but also should include the safety of the other countries and the international community.Uruguay take this opportunity to call on Each nuclear-weapons state undertakes not to assist any non-nuclear weapon state to manufacture or acquire such weapons or devices.and undertake to facilitate the fullest possible exchange of equipment, materials and scientific and technological information for the peaceful us of nuclear energy.
NPT
Each nuclear-weapons state undertakes not to assist any non-nuclear weapon state to manufacture or acquire such weapons or devices.
Each nuclear-weapons state undertakes not to receive any assistance in their manufacture.
Article III: Each nuclear-weapons state undertakes to conclude an agreement with the IAEA for the application of its safeguards to all nuclear material in all of the state's peacef
ul nuclear activities and to prevent diversion of such material to nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices.
Article IV: 1. Nothing in this Treaty shall be interpreted as affecting the inalienable right of all the Parties to the Treaty to develop rearch, production and u of nuclear energy for peaceful purpos without discrimination and in conformity with Articles I and II of this Treaty.