The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.Summarize the information by lecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Family type | Proportion of people from each houhold type living in poverty |
Single aged person | 6% (54,000) |
Aged couple | 4% (48,000) |
Single, no children | 19% (359,000) |
Couple, no childrenlos是什么意思 | 7% (211,000) |
Sole parent | 21% (232,000) |
Couple with children | 12% (933,000) |
All houholds | 11% (1,837,000) | 当字组词
| |
The table here depicted about the proportion of different type of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. Total 1,837,000 poor families has been lected in this study which is 11
% of the total, varies from Aged family, no children family to families with children.
From the table, we can e clearly that the highest proportion group is the family with children---what is more, the sole parent, 21% , about 232,000 families is on the first place. While couple with children, 12%, 933,000 is followed.
The Second higher group is families without children, from which single families without children is the most rious one --19% , 359,000 families and couple without children ems better , only 7% about 211,000 families.
And the smallest group should be the aged families which total is only 10%, among which single aged person is 6%, two percent higher than the aged couple.
Bad on the data the table provided and what we analyzed above, we can draw the conclusion that Having children is the most crucial reason for being poor while aged is the less crucial one.
First, the subway systems in the six cities were opened in time quence with London being the earliest (in 1863) and Los Angeles the latest ( in 2001 ). The underground railway system had their prime time in the 20th century, which saw the construction of 4 underground railway systems respectively in Paris (1900), in Tokyo (1927), in Washington DC (1976), and in Los Angeles (1981).
法律渊源的含义Second, en from London to Los Angeles, which happened to be in chronological order of subway construction, the above-mentioned six cities roughly revealed a trend of sharp
decrea in the length of the subway route. London ranked No. 1 in this respect, with a length of 394km; Paris came next with 199km; Tokyo was No. 3 with 155km; Washington DC ranked No. 4 with 126 km. Kyoto and Los Angeles were the most interesting, with merely 11km and 28km respectively, nothing comparable with the top 4 cities.
Third, we e some really unexpected figures about the number of pasngers transported by the subway system in the six cities. Tokyo took the lead with 1.927 billion; Paris came next with 1.191 billion; London was No. 3 with 775 million; Washington DC was No. 4 with 144 million. Los Angeles and Kyoto had 50 million and 45 million respectively. Therefore, we can e the big difference as compared with other cities.
Overall, the six cities revealed great differences in the history of subway construction, the length of subway lines and the yearly pasnger transportation capability.
Average distance in miles traveled per person per year, by mode of travel
| 1985 | 2000青轴键盘 |
Walking | 255 | 237 |
Bicycle | 51 | 41 |
武汉停水通知Car | 3,199 | 4,806 |
Local bus | 429 | 274 | 七年级下册古诗文
Long distance bus | 54 | 124 |
Train | 289 | 366 |
Taxi | 13 | 42 |
Other | 450 | 585 |
All modes | 4,740 | 6,475 |
| | |
The table indicates the number of miles by the average English person in 1985 and 2000, using various means of transport.
The number of miles walked, cycled and travelled by local bus all decread. Of the, the number of miles travelled by local bus decread the most, from 429 miles in 1985 to 274 miles in 2000.The number of miles travelled by car, long distance bus, train and taxi all incread. The number of miles driven by car was 3,199 in 1985 and ro by 50% to 4,806 in 2000. The number of miles travelled by long distance bus more than doubled from 54 miles (1985) to 124 miles (2000). The number of miles driven by taxi trebled from 13 miles (1985) to 42 miles (2000). The u of other, unspecified, forms of transport also incread.
Overall, the number of miles travelled by the average English person ro from 4,740 miles in 1985 to 6,475 miles in 2000, with the increa of cars accounting for almost all of that increa.
The table above compares the percentage of national consumer expenditure by different categories in 2002.
As can be en clearly, consumers spending on Food/Drinks/Tobacco accounted for the largest percentage in all five countries listed in the chart. This figure was highest in the Turkey at 32.14%, followed by 28.91% in Ireland, 18.8% in Spain, 16.36% in Italy and 15.77% in Sweden.
In terms of Clothing/Footwear, consumers in Italy spent the most on this item at 9%. This 新疆省面积
figure was approximately 2.5% higher than the amounts spent in Turkey, Spain and Ireland, and 3.6% higher than that spent in Sweden.
打回头That last consumer item included in the chart is Leisure/Education. The largest amount of 4.35% spent on this item in Turkey was more than twice as high as the amount spent in Spain, which had the lowest figure. In between were Sweden and Italy-both around the 3.2% mark-and Ireland at 2.21%.
