DIFFERENT MANAGE SYSTEM IN DIFFERENT CULTURE
A Term Paper
prented to
the Cour of Intercultural Communication,
Spring, 2012,
College of ************
*************University
by
*******
June 2012
摘 要
以霍夫斯塔德文化维度理论为依据，通过对比分析，总结了造成不同文化的不同管理体系差异的缘由。霍夫斯塔德维度理论又分为四个部分，即：权力距离、个体主义与集体主义、男性度与女性度、不确定性避免以及长期取向于短期取向。
在现代社会，管理体制对于企业的发展起着非常重要的决定性作用，这使得在不同文化体制下的相似机构，可能会产生截然不同的管理体制，这些管理体制不但影响着企业的发展模式和趋向，也从侧面反映了文化的内涵。
但是并不意味着某种体制就是绝对的合理的，这取决于不同的文化体制，在不同的国家，也就需要有不同的管理体制来适应社会文化。
关键词：霍夫斯塔德文化维度理论；不确定性避免；权力距离；管理体系
Abstract
Hofstede cultural dimensions theory bad on comparative analysis , summarizes the differences in the cau of the different management systems for different cultures . Hofstede dimension theory is divided into four parts, namely: power distance , individualis
m and collectivism , the degree of males female degree , uncertainty avoidance, and long-term orientation in short-term orientation .
In modern society, the management system for enterpri development plays a very important and decisive role , which makes similar institutions in different culture system may have very different management system , management system not only affect development patterns and trends , but also from the reflection of the culture.
But does not mean some kind of system is absolutely reasonable , depending on the different cultural systems in different countries , also need to have a different management system to adapt to the social and cultural .
Key words：Hofstede cultural dimensions theory , uncertainty avoidance index , power distance ,manage system
Outline
1. Introduction
2. Different manage system
2.1 Manage system in China
2.2 Manage system in some other countries
3. reason for the different manage system between different countries
3.1 What factors have contributed to the different
3.2 u Hofstede`s cultural dimensions theory to deal with it
4. conclusion
1. Introduction
Management system plays an increasingly important role in modern society . It directly affects the status and prospects of the development of enterpris , and influence the composition of the culture . However, in different countries , has a different management
system culture , this difference makes the different countries , the development model and the development of obvious differences.
However , this cultural difference is not absolutely correct or incorrect, a different management system culture is bad on the different countries and cultural backgrounds , that is, suitable for the system in some countries is not necessarily suited to another country , so study this system becau , for our management system has an important role.
Next, the different management systems in different countries will make to describe and explain.
2. Different manage systems
2.1 Manage system in China
Enterpris in China , focusing on the harmony between the employees , so in many cas , we can not e the very strong competition between employees . However , betw
een the staff and leadership , but there are obvious differences . Employees are not and leadership on the same height , the obvious differences in status makes employees for the leader has a very strong fear , so in many cas , the fault of the leader, We dare to point it out , which makes the development of enterpris has been hampered in some n , more than that , however terrible . When employees fear a n of the leader have riously affected the enthusiasm of the staff , making Arrested Development .
On the other hand , the Chine management system , there are obvious collectivism that everyone's interests above all el , if someone destroyed the collective interests , it will be condemned by the collective , and will be punished accordingly .
So ,in China ,there are obviously Collectivism , the development of enterpris by the collective impact.
2.2 Manage systems in some other countries
In other countries, this management system will be significantly different. For example, in the United States in the management system of the United States , focusing on individualism, everyone is fighting for in some respects superior to other people , which makes the enterpri , there is a clear competitive relationship.
More importantly, there does not exist significant differences in status between the leader and staff , employees can choo their own views directly to tell the leader and the leader does not get angry , but will actively promote the recommendations this role in promoting the healthy development of enterpris.
