很多哲学家比如德里达，所说的“在场”是什么意思？
我为什么强调，prence是与时间紧密联系的，特别是与现时/现下（同时也意味着与语法中的现在时有紧密的关联），请参考下面引文（Derrida对于prence的论述，首先源自于他对Husrl的行文的精读和分析）。我再次强调，并不是市场上流通的术语翻译就是已然最完美，最合适，最准确的，如果先入为主地这样的设定了，那也没有什么可以多说了。也就是说，“在场”作为对prence的翻译一点都没有关注这个概念多层次上的运作。
Husrl: All our ideas about time spring from our experience of the prent. That conscious experience is characterized by being intentional, by being toward something. We typically recognize three kinds of time: scientific, objective, Newtonian time, which we think of as being independent of ourlves and as independently verifiable; subjective time, in which events em to move slower or faster; and phenomenological or intentional time, which is the fundamental experience on which the other concep文艺复兴的背景
ts of time are bad, from which the other concepts derive becau the phenomenological prent includes not only awareness of prent phenomena (the prent), but retention (awareness of that which is not prent b
ecau it no longer is—the past), and protention (awareness of that which is not prent becau it is about to be). The prent is intentionality toward phenomena before us here, now. The past prent intentionality toward phenomena that are not prent but are with us and so must be past (that’s where the definition ofpast comes from). The 复方鱼腥草片
future is prent intentionality toward phenomena that also are prent but are not with us (as the past is) and so must be the future, which will be (that’s where the definition of future comes from). Therefore, in their origins in our p老师退休工资
henomenological experiences, the future and the past are parts of the prent, conceptual phenomena held in the prent, alongside actual phenomena, as phenomena no longer prent and not yet prent.
