Dear Editor:
We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their kind comments and valuable suggestions. We carefully read the reviewers’ reports and revid the manuscript according to their suggestion. All changes to the original manuscript were shown in red font.
Following are the reviewer’ comments and our respons to the comments:
Reviewer #1:
The manuscript is well-revid according to the reviewer’s comments. All the reviewer’s questions are now all clear. The revid manuscript became better for understanding to readers.
By the reasons the reviewer suppos this manuscript is now acceptable for the publication in Polymer International.
Answer: Thank the reviewer for his kind suggestion.
Reviewer #2:
I had claimed 4 major comments in former review. Now figures are correctly revid. However, I still have a doubt for following points.
Title and abstract are still hard to imagine the content. I suggest the ntence “air jet electrospinning” should be replaced by “bubble electrospinning”. I think that the esnce of your spinning unit may be making threads from breaking bubbles. This technique is already published and well known as “Bubble electrospinning”[1]. So if you u this term, reader can image your esnce more easily. In addition, the esnce of your spinning system may be contain veral ts of negative-charged spinning unit and positive-charged spinning unit to naturalize each charges. Why don’t you describe this point in the abstract?
Answer: Thank the reviewer for his kind suggestion. Indeed, as noticed by reviewer, title and abstract are hard to imagine the content. The ntence “air jet electrospinning” had been replaced by “bubble electrospinning” accor上下弹跳
ding to the advice of the reviewer and sh
own in red font in the text. In addition, the “the esnce of your spinning system may be contain veral ts of negative-charged spinning unit and positive-charged spinning unit to naturalize each charges” had been added in the abstract.
Answer: Thank the reviewer for his kin愚不可及的意思
d suggestion. This careless mistake pointed out by the reviewer have been revid carefully, and shown in red font.
Thank the reviewers for their kind comment over again!
Best wishes,
Dr. Your Name
