题文
Cell phones: is there a cancer link?Could your cell phone give you cancer? Whether it could or not, some people are worrying about the possibility that phones, power lines and Wi-Fi could be responsible for a range of illness, from rashes to brain tumors. Some say there is evidence to support the growing anxieties. David Carpenter, a professor of environmental health sciences at the university at Albany, in New York, thinks there’s a greater than 95 percent chance that power lines can cau childhood leukemia(白血病). Also there’s a greater than 90 percent chance that cell phones can cau brain tumors. “It’s apparent now that there’s a real risk, ” said Carpenter. But others believe the concerns are unjustified. Dr Martha Linet, the head of radiation epidemiology(流行病学) at the US National Cancer Institute, has looked at the same rearch as Carpenter but has reached a different conclusion. “I don’t support warning labels for cell phones, ” said Linet. “We don’t have the evidence that there’s much danger. ”Studies so far suggest a weak connection between EMFs(电磁场) and illness— so weak that it might not exist at all. A multinational investigation of cell phones and brain cancer, in 13 countries outside the US, has been underway for veral years. It’s funded in part by the European Union, in part by a cell phone industry group. The final report should come out later this year, but data so far don’t suggest a strong link between cell phone u and cancer risk. 小题1:From the passage we can learn that some people are worried becau _______. A.they have evidence that the u of cell phones can lead to cancerB.they make a fuss over cell phone uC.some experts have given a warningD.cell phones are responsible for brain tumors小题2:By saying “I don’t support warning labels for cell phones, ” Dr Martha Linet has the idea that _______. A.the worrying is unnecessaryB.cancer-warning labels should be on cell phonesC.there is a link between cell phones and cancerD.cell phones have nothing to do with cancer小题3:Which of the following best describes the attitude of the author towards the debate? A.Optimistic. B.Objective. C.Opposite. D.Casual. ] 题型:未知难度:其他题型答案
小题1:C小题2:A小题3:B解析
文章讲述的是关于手机等辐射是否对人体有害的各方观点。小题1:推理判断题。根据文中第二段的内容可知,有些专家明确辐射会致病,并警告人们。选C小题2:推理判断题。根据第四段最后一句but data so far don’t suggest a strong link between cell phone u and cancer risk.可知,该专家认为没有任何证据可以证明辐射可以对人体造成伤害。所以这些担心是没有必要的,选A小题3:推理判断题。文中作者并没有明确表明自己赞成还是反对的观点,所以是比较客观 地看待该问题。选B考点
据考高分专家说,试题“Cell phones: is ther.....”主要考查你对 [健康环保类阅读 ]考点的理解。 健康环保类阅读健康环保累阅读概念:
健康环保类文章常是介绍科学知识、生活常识和环境保护方面的短文。体裁有记叙文、 说明文、议论文和各种应用文。
健康环保类文章阅读技巧:
健康环保类文章常是介绍科学知识、生活常识和环境保护方面的短文。阅读此类短文要以现象或事物为中心进行思考,理解现象产生的原因、条件和客观规律等。同时要抓住事物的特征、用途和相互关系等。科普环保类文章一般为说明文,从结构上看大致可分为三个部分: 第一部分一般是文章的首段,主要用来提出文章的主题,即文章想要阐述、说明的主要内容; 第二部分是文章的主体,可由若干个段落组成,对文章的主题进行展开说明; 第三部分是结尾段,对文章的主题进行归纳总结。这类文章多用一般现在时,而且一般多使用客观性词语表述。有时为了强调客观性,也常使用被动语态。 从近几年的考试题来看,科普环保类的文章越来越与人们的实际生活相接近。由于此类文章缺乏故事情节,很多同学对此类文章感到费解。但一般的科普类文章都是就事论事,需要逻辑推理和想象的时候较少,因此此类阅读题也没有同学们想象中的那么难,只要多加训练,就能较好地答题。【阅读策略】 1、概要(Summarizing): 阅完材料后,将所阅材料浓缩,摘要,做出所阅材料的书面或口头梗概。 2、组织(Organization): 阅读后根据阅读内容,识别观点、人物、事件之间的关系以及文章的结构关系。如:时间关系、比较或对比关系、相关关系及因果关系等。
本文发布于:2023-02-05 06:30:53,感谢您对本站的认可!
本文链接:https://www.wtabcd.cn/fanwen/fan/89/531850.html
版权声明:本站内容均来自互联网,仅供演示用,请勿用于商业和其他非法用途。如果侵犯了您的权益请与我们联系,我们将在24小时内删除。
留言与评论(共有 0 条评论) |