野开头的四字成语本文部分内容来自网络整理，本司不为其真实性负责，如有异议或侵权请及时联系，本司将立即删除！
== 本文为word格式，下载后可方便编辑和修改！ ==
英文影评格式
一个人电影篇一：英语影评写作格式
Film Review
1 A proper title
2 Beginning
2.1 Introduction to the film (within 2-3 ntences)
2.2 Main idea (general /critical view about the film)
3 Development
3.1 Analysis of the most striking/ impressive scenes
3.2 Inspirations from the film
3.3 Film-making stuff (background/
language/ tting/ music/ dressing …)with unique feature
4 Ending9月25日是什么星座
Summary and reemphasis of personal view about the film
篇二：影评的格式
数字的词语
阿甘正传观后感（中英文对照）
阿甘有自己的坚持，他不断地跑步，JUST RUNS. 他跑步不为任何理由。他说:"人要往前看，千万不要被过去拖累。我想我跑步就是这个意义”和过去告别，不停留在原处。也许这世界上太多人随拨逐流，很少人会坚持做一件事，阿甘坚持自己的坚持，于是他成了“神”。
影片中还有一位主要人物是上校丹。他在越南战争中失去了双腿。他说他的命运就是战死。然而阿甘却救他，让他活了下来。失去双腿后他开始憎恨生活，生活得很颓废，责怪阿甘当初救了他。然而当他调整心态，去和阿甘一起捕鱼生活，有了收获后，开始感觉到生活的美好。感谢阿甘当初就了他。影片试图通过这个角色告诉观者生活总是美好的。乌云后有彩虹，绝境后有重生。关键是看我们给不给自己一个好心态，一个机会去改变不好的现状。影片试图向观者传达这样一个信息：或许做好我们该做的每一件事，生活就会给我们一个好的回馈。只要有一种坚持就会出现一个奇迹。
我的前半生剧情Mr. A Gan has his own perverance, keeping on running without of any reason, JUST RUNS.
He said: “Man has t look forward, and never encumbered by foretime. I thank that's the
meaning of my running.” Say goodbye to foretime and don't stay in-place. Although so many
people in the world are ud to follow others and few people can stick to one thing,
Mr. A Gan does and becomes “GOD”. There is another character Captain Dan. Dan lost his
legs in Vietnarm War. He said that his fate is death in war. However, Mr. A Gan saved him
and let him be alive. After losing legs, Dan was decadent and disgusted with life,
玉石王
complaining that A Gan shouldn't save him. When he adjusted his mind, living on fishing
with A Gan, he started to enjoy the wonderful life and thank A Gan's help. The movie is
intended to tell people that life is wonderful by this character. Rainbow is always
after cloud. The key point is that whether we have a good mind and an opportuni
ty to
ourlves to change bad situation. The movie is also nt such a message to us: do
well what we should do, and life will return us well. There will be a miracle if
only there is perverance.
Ice Age 冰河世纪 英语影评
It’s not particularly surprising to be disappointed by any computer-animated film not bearing the Pixar logo. In fact, until Shrek, 201X’s rollicking success, I wouldn’t have even believed it could happen. What is surprising, is that Ice Age doesn’t even ATTEMPT to reach Pixar’s Toy Story heights, apparently content to revel in its status as Monster’s, Inc.'s cond rate, half wit cousin.
Ice Age is yet another “extinction for kids” movie, one of many in a long line of baby dinosaurs, pterodactyl eggs, and sympathetic cavemen. This time, it’s the ice age, and wooly mammoths roam the earth alongside primitive man. Strangely enough, in this early world, animals can talk, and humans cannot. But when a group of would-be-enemies discover a lost human baby, wooly mammoth (Ray Romano), saber-toothed tiger (Dennis Leary), and giant sloth (John Leguizamo) must work along side each other in a journey to return the child to its home. 第九套广播体操
Visually, Ice Age is perhaps the poorest bit of CGI I have ever en. Contrasted to the beautiful constructs of Monsters, Inc.; or even the gooey, gloppy creativity of Shrek; Ice Age is nothing but badly rendered polygons and Acme animated characters. No hint of photo-realism here. It’s like comparing a Bugs Bunny Cartoon to The Lion King. Actually, I suspect that is exactly what the folks at Ice Age were going for.
Ice Age is really little more than a collection of silly animal gags and Leguizamo one liners. Some of them are even quite funny. If that is all that we’re going for here, then I suppo I’m all for it. But then there are the strange attempts at gut wrenching sappiness, which fall painfully flat amidst sub-video game animation. Frankly, I’m not even sure the CGI they u here is up to the 学生会自荐信
task of displaying the kinds of emotions the people are trying to illicit from their characters. The humans more cloly remble totem poles than they do living, breathing, creatures. It’s laughable watching their polygon-limited faces trying to emote in respon to the story’s attempts at heartfelt, soft touches.
Thankfully, the main characters are animals, which are at least bearably rendered to slapstick fun levels. As a result, what slapstick there is, is highly entertaining. Sure, Ray Romano’s vocal talents aren’t particularly spectacular. But Dennis Leary and the always-odd John Leguizamo cover for his mammoth ineptitude without hesitation.
The story itlf is bland, boring, and uninspired, as is the almost laughably bad animation. The film’s only real saving graces are some slapstick side trips into the world of an unlucky squirrel and a group of soon-to-be-extinct melon-hoarding dodos. Ice Age’s comedy is worthy of Bugs, but unless you’re under 5, you’ll be bored with everything el.
