踌躇满志意思雅思写作教育类范文
越南特色1. In many countries, crime is increasing.What are the main reasons for this? What can be done to improve the situation?
Although it is arguably impossible to pinpoint a single cau for the recent ri in global crime, the main culprits are thought to be poverty and political oppression. A commonality between the two appears to be the dissatisfaction of a people. Thus, it is argued that global crime can be reduced through measures that promote public feelings of well-being and curity. To prove this, strategies that reduce poverty and oppression will be analyzed.
Firstly, encouraging prosperity among poverty-stricken areas can be a very powerful tool when combating crime. For example, a once dangerous area of my hometown in Ottawa has undergone major infrastructural development over the past twenty years. The addition of schools, libraries and quality health facilities led to the establishment of a new economical status for the people who lived there. With the ri of this new affluence came a major fall in crime rates. This clearly shows how tackling the issue of poverty creates inroad
s against violations of the law.
In addition to this, providing people more political freedom can also reduce crime. For instance, over the past ten years China has increasingly allowed critical comment of its ruling party to appear in local newspapers. Despite the fact that this level of freedom pales in comparison with many other countries, it is felt this thawing of political control has done a lot to reduce crime rates across the country. Thus, providing increasing levels of political freedom can be en as a measure to combat crime.
After analyzing the reduction of poverty and political oppression, it is felt that crime is best tackled by reducing the caus of unrest among people. By following this cour of action, major reductions in global crime rates are expected.
序数词的用法
关于雪的图片2. Giving detailed descriptions of crime by newspaper and television, someone says it could make bad conquence; this kind of media should be restricted. To what extent do you agree or not agree?
There is no doubt that the detailed descriptions of crimes have been given by most of newspapers and television programs the days. Bad on this, some people think that this is adver for the children. This is partly becau such kind of descriptions will give them a deep negative impression. Surely, I agree that detailed descriptions of crimes should be limited by the government.
Also, I believe that the detailed descriptions of crimes will increa the incidence of crimes. They point out that thousands of criminals learn how to commit a crime from TVs or films. It is well aware that the crimes in young children are increasing annually, and it would associate with a wide range of crimes which children watch every day. For example, the same means, as the films show, is similar to the crimes in the actual society, such as robbery, xual crimes and murders.枪的画法简笔画
On the other hand, other people argue that it is pointless to restrict this kind of media. They probably think that the detailed descriptions of crimes are beneficial for people to prevent crimes. It ems that people will improve alert n, when they e the crime m与人下象棋
小学生猜字谜
eans as TV programs show. However, they hardly realize that the negatives outnumber the positives. In the meanwhile, people can learn how to prevent crimes by the other means such as Internet and books.
In conclusion, I would like to express that the detailed descriptions of crimes should be restricted, but also that the government should appeal to people to learn how to keep away from crimes or dangers.
3. Prison is not a cure for crime. To reduce crime in the long-term, courts should significantly reduce prison ntences and focus on education and community work to help criminals not to re-offend. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
There are many different opinions on the best way to reduce crime. The traditional solution is to be hard on criminals and put them in prison for a very long time. An opposing view is expresd by people with more modern ideas. They think that education and job training are the long-term solutions to cutting crime. So who is right - the tradition
alists or the modernists?
People in favor of reducing prison ntences often argue that prisons should not simply be places of punishment. In traditional prisons, people learn a lot about crime, so when they leave prison, they will commit more crimes. Education, however, gives people the skills to get a job when they leave prison, which means that they will probably not re-offend. Part-time work experience in the community is also very helpful as it is a step back into everyday life in society. People can be in prison, but they can also feel they are doing uful work.过零丁洋
