Should muums and art galleries be free of charge for the general public, or should a charge, even a voluntary charge, be levied for admittance？
Discuss this issue, and give your opinion. You should write at least 250 words.
紫薯蒸多久能熟
Model Answer 1:
People have argued about the entrance fee to muums and art galleries. Some people believe that it should be free of charged for the public, while others think that there should be an entrance fee. The following essay will explain the contradictory opinions in details, but in my point of view, I do believe that there should be levied for admittance.
For a number of reasons, many people believe that the public should not be charged with any kind of fee when they enter muums or art galleries. Firstly, the sites have been funded by the government through taxes that were paid by residents. When muums and art galleries charge entrance fees, it means that people are paying double charges. Secondly, although the places contain historical and artistic artefacts but the places ar
那人依旧
e not popular and attractive places. When the muums and galleries charge some fees, it is predicted that there will be fewer people who will visit the places.
On the other hand, another group of people think that the public should be charged with either voluntary or admittance fees when they visit a muum or an art gallery. The people believe that by charging visitors with a certain amount of fees, it educates them to appreciate the value of history and arts. Besides that, the fees can be ud to reduce subsidies that have been given by the government. The fund could be relocated by the government for other important matters such as education, public health or transportations.
猫咪性格 In conclusion, people often debate about the entrance fee of muums or art galleries. Several people think that there should not be any charges for visitors, while others disagree. I personally believe that there should proportionate charges for people when they enter the muum or an art gallery, as the fund could be ud to cover the operational expen of the places, and reduce the subsidy from the government.
员工履历表
Model Answer 2:
初九日 One very complex issue in today’s world is the funding of muums and art galleries. There is an argument that they should be free to the general public and funded by governments, but there is also a ca for saying that they should charge an entrance fee like other attractions. In this essay, I am going to examine both sides of this issue.
Tho who argue that muums should be free typically make one of two arguments. The first argument is that institutions like muums are a public rvice and therefore there should be free access to the man in the street. If for example there was a charge only the wealthy could afford to enjoy works of art. The cond argument is that if they did levy a charge, fewer people would go to muums. This would be rious as they are educational institutions and standards would fall.
发热英语 In contrast, there is only one major argument on the other side of the debate. This is that both muums and art galleries need to charge an entrance fee if they are to survive in the modern world. Governments do not have sufficient funds to subsidi all such instituti
ons and there are other priorities for public money. Therefore the galleries and muums need to charge their customers not only to survive but to update their exhibitions and make new purchas. By way of illustration, the Tate Modern in London could not have been founded without revenue from admissions. 伟大的母爱作文>搞笑手机壁纸
My personal position is that there is no clear answer to this question as there are such strong arguments on both sides. Perhaps it is possible for some muums and galleries to charge fees and for others not to.
