大学毕业典礼名校校长英语演讲稿
对于一些名校的校长在毕业典礼上是如何发言演讲的呢?下面是的大学毕业典礼名校校长英语，欢迎大家阅读，希望对大家有所帮助。
Good afternoon. My remarks at this moment in our Commencement rituals are officially titled a “Report to the Alumni.” The first time I delivered them, in xx, I was the only obstacle between all of you and J.K. Rowling. I looked out on a a of eager children, costumed Dumbledores, and Quidditch brooms waving impatiently in the air. Today, you await Mark Zuckerberg, who wizardry takes a different form, one that has changed the world, and although he doesn’t em to have inspired an outbreak of hoodies, we certainly do have some costumes in this audience today. I e we are now handing out blankets.
热水器的清洗方法 This is a day of joy and celebration, of happy endings and new beginnings, of families and friends, of achievements and hopes. It is also a day when we as a university perform our most important annual ritual, affirming once again the purpos that animate us and the values that direct and inspire us.
密切的关系
I want to speak today about one of the most important – and in recent months, most contested – of the values. It is one that has provoked debate, disnt, confrontation, and even violence on campus across the country, and one that has attracted widespread public attention and criticism.
查肾功能需要空腹吗 I am, of cour, talking about issues of free speech on university campus. The meaning and limits of free speech are questions deeply embedded in our legal system, in interpretations of the First Amendment and its applications. I am no constitutional lawyer, indeed no lawyer at all, and I do not intend in my brief remarks today to address plex legal doctrines. Nor, clearly, can I in a few brief minutes take on even a fraction of the arguments that have been advanced on this issue. Instead, I speak as one who has been a university president for a decade in order to rai three questions:
电学基础知识
河南省医保中心 First: Why is free speech so important to and at universities?
Second: Why does it em under special challenge right now?
And, third: How might we better address the challenges by moving beyond just defensively protecting free speech – which, of cour, we must do – to actively and affirmatively enabling it and nurturing environments in which it can thrive?
芒果不能和什么一起吃
So first: Why is free speech so important to and at universities? This is a question I took up with the newly arrived first-year students in the College when I weled them at Convocation last fall. For centuries, I told them, universities have been environments in which knowledge has been discovered, collected, studied, debated, expanded, changed, and advanced through the power of rational argument and exchange. We pursue truth unrelentingly, but we must never be so placent as to believe we have unerringly attained it. Veritas is inspiration and aspiration. We assume there is always more to know and discover so we open ourlves to challenge and change. We must always be ready to be wrong, so being part of a university munity requires courage and humility. Universities must be places open to the kind of debate that can change ideas and mitted to standards of reason and evidence that form the bas for evaluating them.
Silencing ideas or basking in intellectual orthodoxy independent of facts and evidence impedes our aess to new and better ideas, and it inhibits a full and considered rejection of bad ones. From at least the time of Galileo, we can e how repressing emingly heretical ideas has blinded societies and nations to the enhanced knowledge and understanding on which progress depend. Far more recently, we can e here at Harvard how our inattentiveness to the power and appeal of conrvative voices left much of our munity astonished – blindsided by the oute of last fall’s election. We must work to ensure that universities do not bee bubbles isolated from the concerns and discour of the society that surrounds them.
Universities must model a mitment to the notion that truth cannot simply be claimed, but must be established – established through reasoned argument, asssment, and even sometimes unfortable challenges that provide the foundation for truth. The legitimacy of universities’ claim to be sources and validators of fact depends on our willingness to actively and vigorously defend tho facts. And we must remember that limiting some speech opens the dangerous possibility that the speech that is ultimately censored may b
e our own. If some words are to be treated as equivalent to physical violence and silenced or even procuted, who is to decide which words? Freedom of expression, as Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes famously said long ago, protects not only free thought for tho who agree with us but freedom for the thought we hate. We need to hear tho hateful ideas so our society is fully equipped to oppo and defeat them.
Over the years, differences about the implementation of the University’s free speech principles have often provoked controversy. And we haven’t always gotten it right. As long ago as 1939, an invitation from a student group to the head of the American Communist Party generated protest and the invitation was ultimately canceled by the Corporation. Bertrand Rusll’s appointment as William James Lecturer just a year later divided the Corporation, but President Conant broke the tie and Rusll came. Campus conflicts over invited speakers are hardly new.
Yet the vehemence with which the issues have been debated in recent months, not just on campus but in the broader public sphere, suggests there is something distinctiv
中国历
e about this moment. Certainly, the controversies reflect a highly polarized political and social environment – perhaps the most divisive since the era of the Civil War. And in the already fractious circumstances, free speech debates have provided a fertile substrate into which anger and disagreement could be planted to nourish partisan outrage and generate media clickbait. But that is only a partial explanation. 咏怀阮籍
