题目类型： Do you agree or disagree ?
Topic 1:
Some people think that advertiments should be restricted . Do you agree or disagree?
Sample:
属龙取名Everywhere, and almost at any time, we find ourlves surrounded by all kinds of advertiments. Some people suggest that the government should impo restrictions in advertiments. But on the other hand, there are also many people who strongly advocate that advertiments should not be restricted.
It is quite easy to find reasons for attacking advertising. First, it is extremely costly to put up an advertiment. TV advertising , for instance, costs more than 100,000 yuan RMB per minute during prime time and this cost must eventually be paid by the consumers. Second, advertiments are misleading and cheating . It is becau advertiments have power influence that the profiteer often tricks the public by them. In addition , surplus advertime
nts have interfered in people’s normal life. Every ten minutes a television program will be interrupted by commercials for a couple of minutes, which ruins good movies and exciting television shows.
超好听的纯音乐
However, other people also argue in defen of advertising. In the first place, it has a valuable informative function, helping potential customers know about the characteristics and prices of products or where they can buy a particular product cheaply. In the cond place, we would have to pay a great deal more if advertising did not create mass markets for products. It is precily becau of the heavy advertising that consumers goods are so cheap. Finally, advertiments also provide money for newspapers, magazines , radios and TV stations. Many kinds of media could not survive without advertiments.
In my opinion, advertiments should not be restricted. They provide us with much uful information . They reduce the price of commodity. What is more, they play a crucial role in the development of media. 描写秋天的声音
Topic 2:
Some people hold that we should not u animals in medical experiments. Do you agree or disagree?
值守Sample:
科技创新图片
Since human beings existed in the world, animals have always been accompanying us. They are of great help to humans in many aspects. For example , they help a lot in medical experiments. Many people argue that animals should not be ud for testing medical techniques and drugs. Others, on the other hand , claim that without animal testing, some patients would suffer or even die from their dias. Before rendering my opinion , I think it is more important to take a glance at the arguments on both sides.
Tho people who strongly believe that we should u animals in experiments have cogent reasons for it. For one thing , animal testing allows scientists to test and create new drugs. It would be cruel that some people die of a dia becau there is not enough information about it. For another, at prent there are no other better methods to replace animal tests. Therefore, animal tests are still regarded as the only reliable and fe
asible method. More importantly , animals such as monkeys or rabbits which are ud in experiments are easily bred. Furthermore, most countries t standards for animals treatment in tests , and laboratories have regulations to prevent cruelty.
However, further analysis would make it clear that animal testing should be halted. First and foremost, animal tests violate animals’ rights. Nothing ems more brutal than taking away a life, no matter it belongs to a man or an animal. Moreover, not all the experiments are reliable . The treatment and drugs which are effective to animals sometimes are uless and even have negative effects on humans. Thirdly, not all the experiments are necessary. With the development of technology, computer simulation can achieve similar results 苏幼珍
From the above comparison and contrast , anyone can obviously conclude that animals should not be ud for testing medical techniques and drugs. As creatures , animals enjoy the same rights as humans. Information from animals does not apply to humans. What is more, other better methods have been discovered to replace animal tests. 别克是哪个国家的车
>不息之影
