PART VI WRITING
Read carefully the following excerpt and then write your respon in NO LESS THAN 200 WORDS, in which you should:
1), summarize the main message of the excerpt, and then
2) comment on Brewer's view that parents should join in with their kids rather than limit their media consumption.
You can support yourlfwith informationfrom the excerpt.
Marks will be awardedfor content relevance, content sufficiency, organization and language quality. Failure tofollow the above instructions may result in a loss of marks.
Write your respon on ANSWER SHEET THREE.
材料：
How much screen time is too much for kids?
Parents have been advid to limit media consumption of their children, but rearch suggests it's the nature of it that matters.
For many parents in the digital age, battles with their kids over screen time and devices have become a depressing part of family life. Many parents will now be relieved to hear that recent rearch suggests that it's not so much the length, but the nature of the screen time that matters.
Jocelyn Brewer, a psychologist who specializes in the concept of “digital nutrition”, likens media diets to what's on our plates: rather than counting calories (or screen time), the ink about what you're eating.
“It's not just about whether you consume any potential digital junk foods, but also your relationship to technology and the role it plays in your family life," says
Brewer.
For young children, the most important thing is whether parents and kids are playing, wat
ching or browsing together.
A study of 20,000 parents published late last year by the Oxford Internet Intuited and Cardiff University determined that there was no correlation between limiting device u and children's well- being. The study's lead author Dr Andrew Pryzbylski
said: 千秋岁数声鶗鴂Our findings suggest the broader family context, how parents t rules about digital screen time, and if they’re actively engaged in exploring the digital world together, are more important than the raw screen time. "
“The connsus is that screen time, in and of itlf, is not harmful- -and reasonable restrictions vary greatly, depending on a child's behavior and personality. There is little point in worrying about how many minutes a day your kids is spending 怎么煮方便面with screens,”says Brewer.“Instead, parents should be doing what they can to ensure excel下拉菜单怎么做that what they are watching, playing and reading is high- quality, age -appropriate and safe -and joining in wherever possible.”
范文 1：
By providing concrete facts and concrete statistics, the article mainly discuss the issue of media consumption in the children's everyday life. The author holds the opinion that the nature of the screen time is one of the major factors. As is illustrated in the remark of Mr. Jocelyn Brewer in the essay, the time that a child spends on his electronic devices is not detrimental to his normal life. In accordance with the children's behavior and character, parents can join with their children, rather th鱼头豆腐汤的家常做法an imposing a重生之强制结合 limit on their screen time. Personally, I strongly agree with Mr. Brewer’s三高人群食谱 view, as can be en in the following paragraphs. (108)
There’s no denying the fact that many young people spend a large amount of spare time 薄荷花on the smart phones and Ipads. In view of their healthy living habit and academic performance, it is advisable that the parents restrict their children’s access to the high-tech devices. This statement does have an element of truth at the first glimp. But it must be pointed out that it is not a viable option nowadays. For one thing, in the contemp
orary society, modern telecommunication devices are not only important, but also indispensable in the daily life of many young people. So it is realistic to absolutely forbid them from using them. For another thing, by influencing their children’s behavioral and thinking pattern, the parents can teach their sons and daughters to keep lf-control and lf-discipline. As a result of the parents’active participation, it is possible楞伽 that the children form a good living habit, and then
