《哲学的贫困》的主要内容
探究
资本主义社会的生产资料私有制，使工业无产阶级和工业资产阶级的矛盾日益凸显。一些有识之士开始在资本主义社会这个大基础背景下探索解放工人的索要。于是出现了各种各样的理论思潮。蒲鲁东思想就是其中之一，蒲鲁东代表小资产阶级反对资本主义社会的大资产阶级，力图为工业无产阶级找到实现他们权利平等的理论工具。然而蒲鲁东的理论却唯心了，缺乏资本主义社会生产的现实基础，使他的理论不能成为科学。
而马克思立足于资本主义现实的生产关系，坚持辩证唯物主义创立了唯物史观。《哲学的贫困》这部着作就是马克思主义唯物史观的第一次公开阐发，是马克思揭露蒲鲁东的唯心史观和蒲鲁东不现实的小资产阶级政治经济学的伟大胜利，为科学社会主义的诞生奠定了基础，是马克思主义创立的伤心英文
巫风标志至少是重要标志。
本文从马克思与蒲鲁东交往关系的演变入手，以资本主义的“生产”为主线，十分重视马克思重要着作的内在联系。在纵向上阐述了马克思（包括恩格斯）从《1844 年经济学哲学手稿》到《哲学的贫困》的心路历程，并联系到后来的《资本论》。《1844年经济学哲学手稿》由于受黑格尔和西方经济学者的影响，
虽然对西方政治经济学展开了研究，但是对政治经济学的研究对象并未科学确立。《哲学的贫困》以唯物史观为指导，科学确立了政治经济学的研究对象问题；横向上研究了从《德意志意识形态》到《哲学的贫困》中唯物史观“生产关系”范畴的确立过程，并联系到后来的《共产党宣言》。
《德意志意识形态》没有严格区分“交往关系”与“生产关系”，认为“交往关系”与生产力是一对基本范畴，而《哲学的贫困》科学的确立了“生产关系”这一经济范畴，并说明了生产力与生产关系的辩证运动，是唯物史观的成熟应用，从而说明了新世界观公开问世的革命性与科学性。
漳州师范《哲学的贫困》是马克思主义哲学与政治经济学的成功结合，并因这个科学的结合得出了科学的理论，论证了科学社会主义的必然性与革命性。论文立足于资本主义社会的“生产”方面，以全面的眼光来分析《哲学的贫困》在马克思主义思想史发展中的地位和《哲学的贫困》与马克思主义理论体系创立的关系。
关键词：马克思；蒲鲁东；哲学的贫困；唯物史观；政治经济学；马克思主义Abstract
Owing to private ownership of capitalist society, the contradictions of industrialproletariat and industrial bourgeoisie is increasingly prominent. Some intellectuals began toexplore some insight in order to liberate the workers in the background of capitalist society.
All kinds of theoretical thought began to appear. Proudhon thought is one of them,Proudhonreprents the petty bourgeoisie against the big bourgeoisie in capitalist society,
豆皮的做法大全trying to findindustrial proletariat’s theoretical tools to come true their rights equality. However,Proudhon’s theory was idealistic and lacked real basis of capitalist social production, so thathis theory is not a science. Marx bad on the reality of the capitalist relationship ofproduction, creating the historical materialism ba on dialectical materialism. The book ofThe Poverty of Philosophy is the first public exposition of Marxist historical materialism. It isthe great victory of Marx revealed Proudhon’s idealism and unrealistic petty-bourgeoispolitical economy, for the birth of scientific socialism laid the foundation and it is thecr eation’s flag of Marxism, at least the important symbol.
This paper start to Marx and Proudhon’s evolution of their relationship and capitalist“production” as its main line, paying attention to the internal relations of Marx’s works. In thelongitudinal direction explained the progress of Marx （including Engels）碗的图片
基准数>薰衣草功效
草书练字from 1844Manuscripts to The Poverty of Philosophy and linked to the later Das Capital. Economic andphilosophical manuscripts in 1844 due to the influence of Hegel and western economists,althoug
h launched the study of western political economics, the rearch object of politicaleconomics has not science established. The poverty of philosophy guided by the historicalmaterialism, established the rearch object of political economics. This paper horizontalstudied historical materialism “relations of production” establishment process, from theGerman Ideology to the poverty of philosophy, and linked to the later Manifesto of theCommunist Party. German Ideology has not strict distinction between “communicationrelationship” and “relations of production”, it consider that “communication relationship”with productivity is a pair of basic category, the poverty of philosophy established “relationsof production” this
