Scopes Monkey Trial
On the venth day of trial, Raulston asked the defen if it had any more evidence. What followed was what the New York Times described as "the most amazing court scene on Anglo-Saxon history." Hays asked that William Jennings Bryan be called to the stand as an expert on the Bible. Bryan asnted, stipulating only that he should have a chance to interrogate the defen lawyers. Bryan, dismissing the concerns of his procution colleagues, took a at on the witness stand, and began fanning himlf.
Darrow began his interrogation of Bryan with a quiet question: "You have given considerable study to the Bible, haven't you, Mr. Bryan?" Bryan replied, "Yes, I have. I have studied the Bible for about fifty years." Thus began a ries of questions designed to undermine a literalist interpretation of the Bible. Bryan was asked about a whale swallowing Jonah, Joshua making the sun stand still, Noah and the great flood, the temptation of Adam
小儿积食怎么办
in the garden of Eden, and the creation according to Genesis. After initially contending that "everything in the Bible should be accepted as it is given there," Bryan finally conceded that the words of the Bible should not always be taken literally. In respon to Darrow's relentless questions as to whether the six days of creation, as described in Genesis, were twenty-four hour days, Bryan said "My impression is that they were periods."
鸡蛋粥的做法
汽车仪表
Bryan, who began his testimony calmly, stumbled badly under Darrow's persistent prodding. At one point the exasperated Bryan said, "I do not think about things I don't think about." Darrow asked, "Do you think about the things you do think about?" Bryan responded, to the derisive laughter of spectators, "Well, sometimes." Both old warriors grew testy as the examination continued. Bryan accud Darrow of attempting to "slur at the Bible." He said that he would continue to answer Darrow's impertinent questions becau "I want the world to know that this man, who does not believe in God, is trying to 光明之海
u a court in Tenne--." Darrow interrupted his witness by saying, "I object to your statement" and to "your fool ideas that no intelligent Christian on earth believes." After that outburst, Raulston ordered the court adjourned. The next day, Raulston ruled that Bryan could not return to the stand and that his testimony the previous day should be stricken from evidence.
The confrontation between Bryan and Darrow was reported by the press as a defeat for Bryan. According to one historian, "As a man and as a legend, Bryan was destroyed by his testimony that day." His performance was described as that of "a pitiable, punch drunk warrior." Darrow, however, has also not escaped criticism. Alan Dershowitz, for example, contended that the celebrated defen attorney "comes off as something of an anti-religious cynic."汽车销售提成
妈妈的爱是什么
The trial was nearly over. Darrow asked the jury to return a verdict of guilty in order that the ca might be appealed to the Tenne Supreme Court. Under Tenne law, Bryan was thereby denied the opportunity to deliver a closing speech he had labored over for weeks. The jury complied with Darrow's request, and Judge Raulston fined him $100.转院手续怎么办理
Six days after the trial, William Jennings Bryan was still in Dayton. After eating an enormous dinner, he lay down to take a nap and died in his sleep. Clarence Darrow was hiking in the Smoky Mountains when word of Bryan's death reached him. When reporters suggested to him that Bryan died of a broken heart, Darrow said "Broken heart nothing; he died of a busted belly." In a louder voice he added, "His dea
猪猪色
th is a great loss to the American people."
A year later, the Tenne Supreme Court reverd the decision of the Dayton court on a technicality--not the constitutional grounds as Darrow had hoped. According to the court, the fine should have been t by the jury, not Raulston. Rather than nd the ca back for further action, however, the Tenne Supreme Court dismisd the ca. The court commented, "Nothing is to be gained by prolonging the life of this bizarre ca."
The Scopes trial by no means ended the debate over the teaching of evolution, but it did reprent a significant tback for the anti-evolution forces. Of the fifteen states with anti- evolution legislation pending in 1925, only two states (Arkansas and Mississippi) enacted laws restricting teaching of Darwin's theory</P< p>
