Over the past decade, thousands of patents have been granted for what are called business
methods. Amazon received one for its -click 莲藕的英文“〞oneonline payment system. Merrill Lynch got legal protection for an ast allocation strategy. One inventor patented a technique for lifting a box.
在过去的十年中， 成千上万的商业方法被授予了专利权。亚马逊获得的专利是在线
“单击 〞付费系统。 美林公司的资产分配方案得到了法律保护。 有个创造者的提箱技巧也获得了专利。
Now the nation’ s top patent court appears completely ready to scale back on business-method
patents, which have been controversial | ever since they were first | authorized 10 years ago. In a |
move that has intellectual-property | lawyers abuzz, the U.S. Court of Appeals | for the Federal |
Circuit said it would u a particular ca to conduct a broad review of business-method patents. 惊悚鬼故事 | |
道路交通标志In re Bilski, a s the ca is known, is | | “ a very big deal, | 〞 says Dennis D. Crouch of the University of |
成熟男头像Missouri School of Law. It | “ has the potential to eliminate an entire class of patents. | 〞 |
现在，该国最高专利法院似乎完全准备好要缩减商业方法专利， | 因为商业方法专利自从 | |
十年前第一次批准授予以来一直有争议。 | 在一项使得知识产权律师们议论纷纷的提议中， | 美 |
国联邦巡回上诉法院声称它将利用某个具体案件来对商业方法专利进展广泛的复审。 | 密苏里 |
大学法学院 Dennis D. Crouch 说，“正如人们所知道的那样， Bilski 案例是一件非常大的事情 | 〞 |
它可能将消除整个专利类别 〞。 | | | | | |
| | | | | |
河北交通电视频道
Curbs on business-method claims would be a dramatic about-face, becau it was the Federal Circuit itlf that introduced such patents with its 1998 decision in the so-called State Street Bank ca, approving a patent on a way of pooling mutual-fund asts. That ruling produced an explosion in business-method patent filings, initially by emerging Internet companies trying to stake out exclusive rights to specific types of online transactions. Later, more established companies raced to add such patents to their files, if only as a defensive move against rivals that might beat them to the punch. In 2005, IBM noted in a court filing that it had been issued more
than 300 business-method patents, despite the fact that it questioned the legal basis for granting them. Similarly, some Wall Street investment firms armed themlves with patents for financial products, even as they took positions in court cas opposing the practice.
对于商业方法诉求的限制是个戏剧性的彻底变化，因为正是联邦巡回法院自己引进了这
种专利。那是在 1998 年，对于所谓的美国道富银行的案件中，联邦巡回法院做出了判决，
批
稀的反义词是什么准了筹集共同基金资产的方法具有专利权。这一裁决使得商业方法专利文件以几何数级增
加，起初只是一些新兴的网络公司对于某些特定类型的在线交易系统试图争取独家专有权。
后来，越来越多的老牌公司也竞相将此类专利入卷归档，至少作为防御措施，以防竞争对
协调工作手抢占先机。 2005年， IBM 公司在一份法院案卷中发现自己被授予了超过300多项商业方法
专利，尽管连它自己都质疑这种专利授权的法律根底。无独有偶， 一些华尔街投资公司也用
多项金融产品专利来武装自己，即使是在他们出席反对此类专利的法案中，他们也以此专
利维权 。
注： to the punch
语文读书手抄报
的英文解释为
to the first blow or to decisive action
―
usually ud with beat
所以这里翻译为“先下手为强 〞或“抢占先机 〞。
The Bilski ca involves a claimed patent on a method for hedging risk in the energy market.
The Federal Circuit issued an unusual order stating that the ca would be heard by all 12 of the
court ’judges, rather than a typical panel of three, and that one issue it wants to evaluate is whether it should “ reconsider 〞 its State Street Bank ruling.
前面提到的 Bilski 案例牵扯到一份已申请的方法专利，即关于能源市场的风险躲避方法
〔注：也可译为 “套期保值或对冲风险〞〕。上诉法院罕见地裁定，该案件将不由三位法官听
审，而是由全部十二名法官共同进展。另外， 上诉法院还宣布，它想探讨的另一件事情是是否应该 “重审 〞道富银行的裁决。
