Argument李延隆笔记

更新时间:2023-07-02 16:30:07 阅读: 评论:0

Argument
How to write the introduction
1. 复述结论(照搬原文,除非原文结论很长)C
2. 简要复述论据和假设(简介概括1~2句)E
3. 指出作者论述过程中存在的缺陷(承上启下)F
P192  T149
(1)The arguer/speaker/author/writer/title
●Inevitably
●Automatically
●Necessity
●Cau(贬义词,造成不好的影响)
●Be the main/leading cau of.
●Be responsible for..(贬义词)
●Trigger/spark/precipitate(贬义词,小错误导致大结果)
(2)造成结果
●Result  in
●Bring  about
●Account  for
●Contribute  to
●Play a part in
●Give ri to
3)归因于:
●Attribute/ascribe(结果)to(原因)
●Put(结果)down to(原因)
4)“声称”
●recommend/ conclude/ claim/ asrt/ state/ contend/ maintain
●Allege(贬义词声称坏事属实)
●S明确近义词pecious似是而非的(贬义词)
●Paradoxical 似非而是的
“建议”recommend/ suggest/ advi/ advocate/ propo
“对未来现象的预言”predict/ foretell/ forecast/ foree
                    Project/ expect/ anticipate
注意:针对性的词汇比通用性强的词汇好。
开头段的变化和调整:
1. 改变顺序 CEFECFFEC(C:conclusion E:evidence F: faul
2. 简化或省略evidence
3. 合并
1)(ECF
●In this argument, the arguer cites the evidence that to reach the conclusion that(CE)
●By citing the evidence that怎么治疗甲亢 the arguer concludes that(EC)
(2)  E(CF)  参考:P186  6分满分作文开头段
4. 添加让步(C=concede让步)
(1)C(CF)/ (CC)EF
Accept/ agree/ concede that
Appear to be convincing/ is not without merits(貌似有说服力)
富盈集团To support/justify the claim/conclusion, the arguer point out that
+However/ Nonetheless/ Nevertheless,…
(2)EC(C’F)
It is true that /admittedly/Granted,
注意:Granted that(=though)(后面不能有but)
(3)CE(CF)
✧做练习:题库,练习写开头段。P3 讲义
论据问题
1.调查类问题
58同城最新招聘●Survey/poll/statistics/study/rearch/report/census
●样本(随机):数量&质量
●样本调查三部曲:
a) 分子群体subgroup
b) 确定比例
c) 随机取样
A.选择性样本(Selective Sample
E.g. P137  193讲义P8
分析
1. 选择性样本错误
            (1)The result of the survey lacks credibility
调查结果缺乏可信度
(2)原因+结果
        原因:a. becau many teachers in other subjects are not include. /becau the arguer fails to consider/ include teachers in other subjects.作者没有考虑到其他学科的老师。
              b.besides, the arguer relies on statistics from only two districts Sanlee and Marlee, which are in all likelihood/ probability not reprentative of the states districts overall. 研究对象只包含两个地区,不全面,缺乏普遍性。
          结果:thus/ therefore could not lend strong support to what the arguer maintains.
2. 因果关系错误(cau-fallacies
注:mistake事实错误
fallacies逻辑错误在作文中使用
        The arguer fails the establish the causal relationship between A (homework frequency) and B (student performance)
3. 草率推广无关概念
结论中提到的twice 只是作者自己一端的,并没有甚么事实依据
4. 不完整比较
次数少并不代表数量就少,也许正是因为次数少,所以每次留的数量更多了。
    E.g. P155  238
(1)选择性样本错误
段首句:(原因+结果)
(原因)The survey does not include all the graduates in Mira Vista College,(结果)and
thus it is almost impossible to evaluate the employment results in Mira Vista College.
附:讲义P5 PART  IV--1 )----正文段结构
1.Topic ntence 段首句
2.Illustration 展开
3.Pargraphic山药薏米粥 conclusion 段落小总结(可有可无)当段落字数太少
时可以加上。
●There is a strong likelihood/probability that
●The odds/chances are that
e.g. the niors are in all likelihood/probability not reprentative of11j312
●排除:Rule out/ exclude
●Scenarios 想象中一系列的事情可翻译为“情况”。
1. 不完整比较
The comparison between GMC and MVC is incomplete.
2. Cau-fallacies
The arguer fails to establish the causal relationship between the fact that A(GMC has more business cours and more job counlors) and the facts that B( 90 percent of last years graduating niors had job offers from prospective employers).
3. 无关概念
The arguer fails to convince us that A (offering more cours in computer technology) will contribute to B(a ri in the employment rate of Mira Vistas graduates).
4. 错误类比
正文结构小总结:
1. GMC、MVC 不完整的比较。
2. 选择性样本错误
3. Cau-effect fallacies让步(即使GMC就业好),未必是课程和顾问导致。
4. Fal analogy再让步(即使因果成立),MVC未必适用。
5. 无关概念(computer cour
B.调查本身是否有意义
见讲义P4 PART 3 1
The arguer treats a lack of proof that Asomething is the caas constituting sufficient proof that B(it is not the ca). 作者缺少证据A来证明B
P121 158
缺乏:
●in the abnce of...
●for lack of
●lacking
(1) 样本数量问题
In the abnce of data concerning the total amount of garbage sits and people living near them in the state, the reliability of the survey is open to doubt/question/debate.
(2) 医院感谢信调查本身没有意义
The arguer treats the fact that A(the garbage did no considerable harm to health recently) as constituting sufficient proof that B(they will not po/constituting any health hazard in the future).
C.样本的数量
P131 180   
T迪卡侬招聘he result of the survey lacks credibility becau the samples are too limited.

本文发布于:2023-07-02 16:30:07,感谢您对本站的认可!

本文链接:https://www.wtabcd.cn/fanwen/fan/89/1064792.html

版权声明:本站内容均来自互联网,仅供演示用,请勿用于商业和其他非法用途。如果侵犯了您的权益请与我们联系,我们将在24小时内删除。

标签:错误   样本   作者   没有   调查
相关文章
留言与评论(共有 0 条评论)
   
验证码:
推荐文章
排行榜
Copyright ©2019-2022 Comsenz Inc.Powered by © 专利检索| 网站地图