银行合规演讲稿
开罐头的技巧Many office authorities impo a restriction on smoking within the office premis. Some governments have even banned smoking in all public places. This is a good idea but it takes away some of our freedom.
What are your opinions on this?
word表格合并 U your own knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence. You should write at least 250 words.
廉政教育片Model Answer 1:(Agreement: Smoking should be banned in office premis and public places)
慢肝养阴胶囊
There is no scope of argument that cigarette smoking is harmful both for the smoker and people around him/her. Cigarette smoking has two major effects on non-smokers-injurious passive smoking and smoking display that has an invitational or persuasive effect on non-smokers. I believe banning smoking in public places and offices not only will discourage smoking but will also keep the smoking practice out of site, though it might apparently look l
重生之文坛巨匠ike transgress into smoker’s freedom. But I believe any harmful activity of a particular person or group of people can not be a definition of freedom. If smoking right in any place is a definition of freedom then why not other drugs? In m opinion, every public place including office must be smoking free. There are veral reasons that government and private authorities are being strict on smoking in offices and even public places. 学前儿童语言教育
新年的愿望作文Firstly, this is an accepted fact that smoking is injurious and deadly to health in veral ways. Secondly, smoking caus health hazards to non-smokers who inhale smoke passively from the smokers. Thirdly, smoking has a strong psychologically influence on others, particularly on children and young who learns from their elderly. Fourthly, in many countries, the cost of health care and insurance has gone up due to smoking related illness. So health authorities and governments are trying to have been en that due to the restrictions, the habit of smoking is on a decline among office goers. Though non-smokers think that restricting smoking in offices and public places is a good idea, smokers often view it as an intervention into their right. Smokers argue that cigarette smoking has a direct relation to their workplace performance, though passive smoking ca
n cau objections from colleagues. But considering the harm of smoking it should be banned. Though pressure groups such as tobacco companies may discourage restrictions on smoking, since the advantages of ban outweigh the disadvantages, mass public support such bans.
