Mill, John Stuart, 1806-1873 . Utilitarianism / by John Stuart Mill
Electronic Text Center, University of Virginia Library
etext.lib.virginia.edu/etcbin/toccer-
new2?id=Mil2Uti.sgm&images=images/modeng&data=/texts/english/modeng/pard &tag=public&part=all
| Table of Contents for this work |
|All on-line databas | Etext Center Homepage |
%ISOlat1; %ISOlat2; %ISOgrk1; %ISOgrk2; %ISOgrk3; %ISOgrk4; %ISOnum;
%ISOpub; %ISOtech; About the electronic version
Utilitarianism / by John Stuart Mill
Mill, John Stuart, 1806-1873
Creation of machine-readable version: Bjorn's Philosophy Guide,
www.knuten.liu./~bjoch509/
Conversion to TEI.2-conformant markup: University of Virginia Library Electronic Text Center. ca. 200 kilobytes
This version available from the University of Virginia Library
舞台效果
Charlottesville, Virginia
Publicly accessible
etext.lib.virginia.edu/modeng/modengM.brow.html
copyright 2001, by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
2001半途而废
Note: A 40-page catalog of publisher`s other offerings appears in the back of the 1901 source. The pages have been scanned and are available in this electronic version as non-archable image files.
About the print version
Utilitarianism
John Stuart Mill
14th impression
3 p.l. 96 p. 23 cm.
Longmans, Green and co
London, New York and Bombay
1901
Alderman Library, University of Virginia, B 1571 .M5 1901
Note: Includes 40-page catalog of other available titles from publisher, in back.
Prepared for the University of Virginia Library Electronic Text Center.
做的组词
Published: 1901
English
qq怎么拉黑别人
Latin
French
German
Greek CORD philosophy nonfiction pro masculine LCSH
Revisions to the electronic version
November, 2001 corrector Jennifer Sorenn, Electronic Text Center
etextcenter@virginia.edu. Commercial u prohibited; all usage governed by our Conditions of U: etext.lib.virginia.edu/conditions.html
UTILITARIANISM
泰安社保BY
JOHN STUART MILL
FOURTEENTH IMPRESSION
LONGMAN'S, GREEN AND CO.
39 PATERNOSTER ROW, LONDON
NEW YORK
AND
BOMBAY
1901
CONTENTS.
CHAPTER I.豆腐和鸡蛋
GENERAL REMARKS . . . . . . . . 1
CHAPTER II
WHAT UTILITARIANISM IS . . . . . . . 8
CHAPTER III.
OF THE ULTIMATE SANCTION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF UTILITY 39 CHAPTER IV.
OF WHAT SORT OF PROOF THE PRINCIPLE OF UTILITY IS SUSCEPTIBLE . . . . . . . . 52
CHAPTER V.
OF THE CONNEXION BETWEEN JUSTICE AND UTILITY . . . 62
河北教育教师网官网Chapter 1
UTILITARIANISM.
CHAPTER I.
脾虚湿盛如何调理
GENERAL REMARKS.
THERE are few circumstances among tho which make up the prent condition of human knowledge, more unlike what might have been expected, or more significant of the backward state in which speculation on the most important subjects still lingers, than the little progress which has been
made in the decision of the controversy respecting the criterion of right and wrong. From the dawn of philosophy, the question concerning the summum bonum, or, what is the same thing, concerning the foundation of morality, has been accounted the main problem in speculative thought, has occupied the most gifted intellects, and divided them into cts and schools, carrying on a vigorous warfare against one another. And after more than two thousand years the same discussions continue, philosophers are still ranged under the same contending banners, and neither thinkers nor mankind at large em nearer to being unanimous on the subject, than when the youth Socrates listened to the old Protagoras, and asrted (if Plato's dialogue be grounded on a real conversation) the theory of utilitarianism against the popular morality of the so-called sophist.
It is true that similar confusion and uncertainty, and in some cas similar discordance, exist respecting the first principles of all the sciences, not excepting that which is deemed the most certain of them, mathematics; without much impairing, generally indeed without impairing at all, the trustworthiness of the conclusions of tho sciences. An apparent anomaly, the explanation of which is, that the detailed doctrines of a science are not usually deduced from, nor depend for their evidence upon, what are called its first principles. Were it not so, there would be no science more precarious, or who conclusions were more insufficiently made out, than
