The government should spend more money on public facilities rather than on artists or artistic projects. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Government sponsorship for arts is a controversial issue, especially when the state is confronted with budget problems. 湖南的旅游景点Tho who object to public funds for arts believe that money should be diverted to the construction of public facilities. I am of the opinion that the government should take citizens’ benefits into consideration and adjust the spending on art or infrastructures accordingly.
It is first important to realize that art is an esntial component of cultural legacy, so the protection and development of art has important implications to cultural diversity. In terms of painting, for example, styles, genres, tool and materials differ from culture to culture. An art form is likely to disappear, if it is not well protected. Besides, some works of art such as graffiti, spark people’s imagination and provide them with a novel perspective to view the world. Art can develop a culture in which people pursue it as a hobby. Furthermore, public art boosts the appeal of the built environment, which is reflected in the diversity of architecture and landscaping.
Despite the importance of art, public facilities derve more of government spending than art. Citizens are more interested in the availability of public facilities, as water and electricity supply, schools, libraries and roads, which have a direct impact on their daily lives. By contrast, for most people, sculptures, paintings or operas are luxury items, which cannot bring any tangible benefit to them. Another reason is that the art can sometimes yield high returns and therefore succeed in receiving business sponsorship. This is particularly the ca when the arts include music, movies, operas and creative arts. Therefore, it is pointless to support the u of public funds for this purpo, if basic facilities are underfunded.
In the light of the facts outlined above, government investment in the arts is esntial to cultural diversity, the development of personal hobbies and the visual appeal of the built environment. H英文字母书写owever, in tho countries who infrastructure is inadequate, government funding for the arts may have to be reduced.
Instead of asking the government to bear the cost of higher education, students should pay tuition fees themlves. Do you agree or disagree?
The government has long been the major funds of university education. Tho people who support government spending on education think that some students do not enroll becau of learning costs. My view is that students’ personal situations should be considered, before the government decides whether to offer free education.
It is worth noting that university education is the key to closing/bridging the income gap. There are numerous students, especially tho from low income families, who cannot afford educational expens. For example, students who study law or medical science may spend many years in the university, making university education an expensive option to them. Becau of financial constraints, people of low socio-economic status are at a disadvantage in terms of educational opportunities and career development. By contrast, children of higher socioeconomic status are more likely to advance their education and find well-paid jobs eventually. As a conquence, the widening income gap may add uncertainty to social stability.
顶礼是什么意思
Higher participation rates in 森林防火的内容tertiary education are also vital to economic and social devel
opment, becau productivity will be improved and citizens’ morals will be strengthened. Even though government sponsorship can inspire people to receive tertiary education, it can also cau the waste of public resources. Free education may be a reason why many students are reluctant to complete their cours and enter the workforce at the earliest date. It not only adds/impos a burden on the country but also affects state funding for other ctors, such as primary and condary education.Let alone students’ contribution allows universities to upgrade facilities and recruit well-qualified lecturers, both important to students’ academic achievement.
To summarize, the government should provide financial support according to students’ needs to ensure that they have access to education. However, tuition fees are applicable to most students, especially tho from middle to high income families, as it helps maintain the quality of tertiary education.
Economic progress is one way to measure the success of one country, while some people think that there are other factors. What other factors should be considered?
Among the factors, do you think that any factor is more important than the others?
中国最宜居城市The rapid growth of emerging economies has fuelled controversy over how to define successful countries. R欢乐的近义词egarding the distinguishing features of successful王者荣耀怎么打 countries, people might have some shared opinions but they do not reach any agreement. I think that besides economic development, other factors should be taken into consideration.
Firstly, social welfare is a significant factor, which has relevance to people’s satisfaction with life. There is ample evidence that in many developing countries, poor people do not benefit from economic growth, which is reflected in the widening gap between haves and have-nots. National wealth is not distributed evenly, as the health care rvice and the education system are underfunded. Among other problems, the ever-increasing cost of living and the escalating class conflict are particularly pronounced. It is also important to realize that the economic development of some countries is achieved at environment’s expens. This has a destructive effect on the natural environment and caus the spread of different dias.
