高中英语新高考-阅读理解：抽丝剥茧，深入剖析高考科普类阅读命题规律
雀斑妆B
Symbolic communication in the form of language underlies our unique ability to reason — or the conventional wisdom holds so. Anew study published in Science, though, suggests our capacity to reason logically may not actually depend on language, at least not fully. The findings show babies still too young to speak can reason and make reasonable deductions.
南红鉴定
这样读：
段落语篇结构：旧观点(conventional)--》新观点（new study, though) -->结论（show)
命题点：新观点的理解？
关键句：Science, though, suggests our capacity to reason logically may not actually depend on language, at least not fully.
翻译：但是，科学表明，我们逻辑推理能力其实可能并非依赖语言，至少不是完全依赖。
这就和：58 C: language is not a requirement for some basic reasoning (语言并非是一些基础推理的必要条件）一致的，考生如果选了干扰项，说明根本没看到这句话。
The authors—a team from veral European institutions—studiedinfants (婴儿) aged 12 and 19 months, when language learning and speech production has just begun but before complex mastery has been achieved. The children had to inspect distinct objects repeatedly—such as a dinosaur and a flower. The items were initially hidden behind a black wall. In one t of experiments the animation (动漫) would show a cup scooping (舀出) up the dinosaur. Half of the time, the barrier would then be removed to reveal, as expected, the remaining flower. In the rest of the instances, though, the wall would disappear and a cond dinosaur would be there.
这样读：
上一段谈到结论，下一段就是实验了，标准的科普文风格。难道一句句读？聪明的读者应
该是看看后面的题目：有没有考到实验细节还只是考实验结果？只有考细节我们才具体看下去。
59. The rearchers draw the conclusion from the fact that_______.
可见，这只是考结论。看下段，找结果去！
The children deduced in the latter occurrences that something was not quite right, even though they were unable to express in words what was wrong. Eye-tracking—a commonly ud technique to judge mental abilities in preverbal (语前的) children and apes—showed infants stared significantly longer at scenes where the unexpected object appeared behind the barrier, suggesting they were confud by the reveal. “Our results indicate that the acquisition of logical vocabulary might not be the source of the most fundamental logical building blocks in the mind,” says lead study author Nicoló Cesana-Arlotti. A major component of human logic, he notes, relates to thinking about alternative possibilities and 怎样学习eliminating inconsistent ones: Does the dinosaur sit behind the barrier or does the flower? In a formal logic this is called a disjunctive syllogism (析取
撒面粉
三段论): A or B; not if A, therefore B.
这样读：
抓住第一句的主题句的,后半句是关键句。意为：某些地方不是那么对，即使他们不能用语言表达具体错误。这个59.A the infants were aware of illogical outcomes意思一致。其它选项都是针对具体细节进行推测，over and over again, nsitive, show interest在文字中都找不到根据，如果选它们的话，那就是受到 infants stared significantly longer at scenes where the unexpected object appeared behind the barrier, suggesting they were confud by the reveal的干扰，这句只是说孩子们盯的时间长。
接下来猜测词义，这个要看冒号后面的解释了：...or...? , therefore ...这题不难。（熟悉四级词汇的常读外刊的这个词直接看出意思了。）如何填报志愿
Cesana-Arlotti acknowledges his findings do not deny改名申请书 the importance of language and symbolic communication to human brain development, and to our evolutionary backstory. 玉米布丁Yet 洗衣店利润the new rearch suggests that perhaps it is not entirely necessary to shap
e the brain’s logical reasoning capacities. He plans further workstudying how logic before the development of language might still differ from reasoning abilities that appear once language comes along, as language may open additional reasoning abilities unavailable to the speechless brain.
