重庆市高考英语阅读理解试题(附答案)
一、高中英语阅读理解
1．阅读理解
Eating red meat is linked to cancer and heart dia, but are the risks big enough to justify giving up juicy burgers and delicious steaks? Probably not, according to rearchers who reviewed data from 12 clinical trials involving about 54,000 people. In a ries of controversial papers, the rearchers argue that the incread health risks tied to red meat are small and uncertain, and
that cutting back likely wouldn't be worth it for people who enjoy meat.
Tho conclusions go against established medical advice. They were swiftly attacked by a group of famous U.S. scientists who took the unusual step of trying to stop the papers from being published until their criticisms were addresd.楠溪江
The new work does not say red or procesd meats like hot dogs and bacon are healthy, or that people should eat more of them. The team's reviews of past studies generally support the ties to cancer, heart dia and other bad health outcomes. But the authors say the evidence is weak, and t
hat there's not much certainty meat is really the cau, since other diet and lifestyle factors could be at play.
If the latest example of how divisive nutrition rearch has become, with its uncertainties leaving the door open for conflicting advice. Critics say findings often aren't backed by strong evidence. Defenders counter that nutrition studies can rarely be conclusive becau of the difficulty of measuring the effects of any single food, but that methods have improved.
Bad on their analys, the rearchers said people do not have to cut back for health reasons. But they noted that their own advice is weak, and acknowledged that they didn't consider factors such as animal welfare and the environment. Indeed, the ca that meat production is bad for animal welfare and the environment is stronger than the ca that it's bad for human health, according to an editorial that accompanies the report.
Not all of the report authors agreed with its conclusions. Three of the 14 rearchers said they support reducing red and procesd meats. A coauthor of one of the reviews is also among tho who called for a publication delay.
Tho who pushed to postpone publication also questioned why certain studies were included
in the reviews while others were left out.
As for his own diet, Dr. Gordon Guyatt, a member of the international rearch team that conducted the reviews, said he no longer thinks red or procesd meats have significant health risks. But he said he still avoids them out of habit, and for animal welfare and environmental reasons.
（1）What is the author's purpo in writing the passage?
好听的军歌A.To introduce a new relationship between health and eating red meat.
B.To urge more people to keep away from eating red meat regularly.
C.To prent a new controversial view on impacts of eating red meat.
D.To criticize nutrition studies for lacking of conclusive evidence.
（2）What is the author's attitude towards the new rearch?
A.Doubtful.
B.Positive.
C.Disapproving.
D.Objective.
（3）Guyatt's avoiding red meats has the weakest connection with_______.
A.health risks
B.diet habits
C.animal welfare
（4）What can we learn from the recent rearch?
A.Red meats don't have significant health risks.
B.Reducing meat consumption will be worth it.
C.The report authors have reached a connsus.
D.Consuming red meat will do good to health.
【答案】（1）C
（2）D
（3）A
（4）A
【解析】【分析】本文是一篇议论文，作者对于吃红肉是否与癌症和心脏病有关引用了研
究发现、结果、例子等客观数据和事实来写这篇文章。
（1）考查推理判断。根据第一段中的“Eating red meat is linked to cancer and hear t dia, but are the risks big enough to justify giving up juicy burgers and delicious steaks? Probably not,
可知，吃红肉与癌症和心脏病有关，但是否这些风险大到足以让according ”
你放弃多汁的汉堡和美味的牛排呢？根据研究人员研究发现，答案是不一定，引导出了一
个关于吃红肉有争议的新观点，故选C。
（2）考查推理判断。根据“according to rearchers who reviewed data”，“ t he rearchers
，“ The team's reviews ，“ Tho conclusions go against established medical advice”argue that”
等等，可知作者主要引用研究
，“ Bad on their analys”
of past studies”“ the latest example”
发现、结果、例子等客观数据和事实来写这篇文章，可知作者对新研究的态度是客观的，
故选D。
（3）考查细节理解。根据最后一段中的“But he said he still avoids them out of habit, and for
但他说避免吃红肉是出于习惯，也是为了保护动animal welfare and environmental reasons.”
物福利和环境，没有说是健康风险问题，可以判断Guyatt避免吃红肉与健康风险的关系最
弱，故选A。
（4）考查推理判断。根据第三段中的“The new work does not say red or procesd meats like hot dogs and bacon are healthy, or that people should eat more of them. The team's reviews of
past studies generally support the ties to cancer, heart dia and other bad health outcomes.
这项新研究并没有说红肉或加工肉类如热狗和熏
But the authors say the evidence ”
肉是健康的，也没有说人们应该多吃。以往研究通常支持红肉与癌症、心脏病和其他不良
水命年份表
健康的联系，但这项研究的作者说这个证据是站不住脚的，可以推断红肉没有明显的健康
风险，故选A。
【点评】本题考点涉及细节理解和推理判断两个题型的考查，是一篇健康类阅读，考生需
上班偷懒
要准确掌握细节信息，并根据上下文进行逻辑推理，从而选出正确答案。
2．阅读理解
It ems we're always being told to get more sleep. Studies suggest spending less time on sleep can lead to obesity(肥胖) and even cancer. You might even find yourlf with a head full of fal memories. But rarely does science explore the dark side of sleeping too much. That's becau few of us in today's busy world have the luck of exploring that option.
In an August 2018 study, published in the Journal of the American Heart Association, rearchers rearched the sleep patterns of tho "fortunate" few and found they may not be so lucky after all. In fact, they found people who get more than eight hours of sleep have greater
health risk compared to tho who sleep together less than ven hours. What's more, sleep-aholics-tho who manage to get 10 hours a night-stand a 30 percent higher chance of dying compared to the ven-hour crowd.
The wide-ranging global study involved(涉及) more than three million people who lf-reported on their sleep habits and came to an eye-opening conclusion: If you tend to sleep a lot,
you may want to buy an alarm clock. As with all things in life, sleep is best taken in moderation(适度).
You may be thinking: What if I only sleep in on Saturday and Sunday, am I still at risk? The answer is yes, according to a 2019 study published in Current Biology. Rearchers discovered
that even if a person sleeps more than ven hours on the weekends but still sleeps less than that on weeknights, they are at risk of gaining weight and developing nsitivity to insulin, which controls the level of sugar in blood.
For the study, 36 participants were divided into three groups that each had a different sleep schedule: nine hours every night, five hours every night, and five hours from Monday to Friday
and sleeping much on weekends. People who get too much sleep tend to feel tired and lack energy. Also, both sleep-deprived(睡眠不足的) groups consume more food and gain weight.
（1）Why is the harmful effect of sleeping too much ldom studied?
A. Few people have time to sleep too much.
B. Lack of sleep caus much more harm.
C. It turns out to be a healthy sleep pattern.
五十度灰在线看D. People's health has nothing to do with it.
（2）What does the underlined words "tho 'fortunate' few" in paragraph 2 refer to?
A. Tho leading a relaxing life.
B. Tho getting too much sleep.
怎么炒C. Tho with less time to sleep.
D. Tho with no sleep problems.
（3）What can be learned from the 2019 study?
A. Sleeping much is particularly beneficial to hungry people.
B. Many people sleep more on weekends than on weekdays.
C. An alarm clock of high quality is important for good sleep.
D. People who sleep much only on weekends also have health risk.
（4）What is the main idea of the text?
A. It is necessary to save enough time for sleep.
B. Too much sleep can result in gaining weight.
C. Sleeping too much does harm to people's health.
D. People can avoid sleeping much by eating healthily.
【答案】（1）A
（2）B
（3）D
（4）C
【解析】【分析】本文是一篇说明文，我们似乎总是被告知要多睡觉，但是睡眠过多对身
体也是有害的。
（1）考查细节理解。根据第一段中的”But r arely does science explore the dark side of sleeping too much. That's becau few of us in today's busy world have the luck of exploring that 可知，在如今忙碌的社会很少有人会有时间睡太多，所以睡眠过多对人体的危害很
option.“
少被研究。故选A。
（2）考查词义猜测。根据第一段中的“That's becau few of us in today's busy world have
这是因为在当今这个繁忙的世界上，很少有人有机会探索
the luc k of exploring that option.”
这种选择；以及第二段中的“…they may not be so lucky after all. In fact，they found people
他们可能根本就没有那么幸who get more than eight hours of sleep have greater health risk“
运。事实上，他们发现睡眠超过8小时的人有更大的健康风险，可推断，划线部分指代“睡眠时间太长的人”。故选B。
（3）考查细节理解。根据第四段中的”Rearchers discovered that even if a person sleeps more than ven hours on the weekends but still sleeps less than that on weeknights, they are at risk of gaining weight and developing nsitivity to insulin, which controls the level of sugar in 研究人员发现，即使一个人在周末的睡眠时间超过7个小时，但仍然比工作日晚上blood.“
的睡眠时间少，他们也有体重增加和对控制血糖水平的胰岛素敏感的风险。可知，只有周
末睡得多的人也会面临健康风险。故选D。
（4）考查主旨大意。根据第一段中的”But r arely does science explore the dark side of sleeping too much.“
可知本文介绍了睡眠过多会对身体造成一定程度的伤害。故选C。
【点评】本题考点涉及细节理解，词义猜测和主旨大意三个题型的考查，是一篇健康类阅
读，考生需要准确捕捉细节信息，同时根据上下文进行逻辑推理，概括归纳，从而选出正
确答案。
3．阅读理解
cif贸易术语As we know, Julian Beever is an international well-known sidewalk chalk artist who drawings have appeared on the streets of London, Buenos Aires, Paris, New York, and countless other cities around the world. Beever creates drawings that look completely three- dimensional when en
from the correct angle.
Now, in his book, Pavement chalk artist: The three-dimensional drawings of Julian Beever, the artist shares some of his most fascinating and humorous pieces, Here are a few examples you'll
find in the book.
●Philadelphia eagle
In Pennsylvania, Beever created "Philadelphiaeagle" a huge drawing with an eagle landing successfully on an American national flag.
●Meeting Mr. Frog
"Meeting Mr. Frog" was created in Salamanca, Spain, and is about a realistic-looking frog sitting on a Lily pad.
Swimming pool in the high street
My personal favorite is "Swimming pool in the high street" from Brusls, which is about a woman relaxing in a swimming pool-----a swimming pool sunk into the middle of the street, that
is!
Along with an introduction about his background, Beever includes a description of the techniques he ud and the challenges he overcame with every drawing. He shares information about his time at home in the UK. and abroad; there is a fun story to back up each piece of art.
Beever's artwork is truly jaw dropping. You're sure to spend ages turning the leaves back and forth, surprid at how one man can create what looks like a three-dimensional design on a flat surface with just a bit of chalk. From animals to superheroes to famous buildings, the paintings
are a wonder to lay eyes on.
Payment chalk artist: The three-dimensional drawings of Julian Beever is surely worth a look.
鹿茸食用And another look. This 112-page hardcover book is available now from Firefly Books at a list price
of $ 29.95
