膳食
在职MBA英语阅读理解练习及答案三数学初三
六年级上数学
课改>谢道韫的诗The average number of authors on scientific papers is sky-rocketing. That’s partly becau labs are bigger, problems are more complicated, and more different subspecialties are needed. But it’s also becau U.S. government agencies have started to promote “team science”. As physics developed in the post-World War Ⅱera, federal funds built expensive national facilities, and the rved as surfaces on which collaborations could crystallize naturally.
洋务运动的时间社会动物 Yet multiple authorship — however good it may be in other ways — prents problems for journals and for the institutions in which the authors work. For the journals, long lists of authors are hard to deal with in themlves. But tho long lists give ri to more rious questions when something goes wrong with the paper. If there is rearch misconduct, how should the liability be allocated among the authors? If there is an honest mistake in one part of the work but not in others, how should an evaluator aim his or her review?
直角梯形面积公式 Various practical or impractical suggestions have emerged during the long-standing debate on this issue. One is that each author should provide, and the journal should then publish, an account of that author’s particular contribution to the work. But a different view of the problem, and perhaps of the solution, comes as we get to university committee on appointments and promotions, which is where
