What impact will Coronavirus have on "ethics and international relations"?
As of 5th May 2020, 3.58 million people worldwide have confirmed Covid-19, and about 250,000 people have died in this pandemic. It has been widely discusd how and to what extent the world will change after the pandemic. Some people think that Coronavirus will change the world from a state of globalism to one of isolationism, and that central power will shift from the West to the East. Others think that the pandemic will not influence global relations, and that the trend of globalization will be further entrenched. This paper argues that the pandemic, as a non-traditional curity threat, has a negative global impact, and attempts to explain through three factors: i) a weakening image of great powers, ii) the demi of globalization worldwide followed by rising nationalism and iii) a changing balance between nations.
剩饭
First of all, whether a government has effectively responded to the epidemic will affect its image as a powerful nation, which is part of the soft power of a nation. That is to say, the pandemic is not just a humanitarian disaster, but also a test of the capability of the national health-care system and the legitimacy of each nation’s government. The US and EU countries, as developed nations, have unexpectedly been thrown into chaos while dealing with the pandemic. In fact, many governments underestimated the riousness of the pandemic and failed to take effective measures to prevent its sp
read. Within a month, the number of infections in the United States has soared to one million, and it is now much higher than that of China. As a great world power, the United States has been a “world savior” and “policeman” over the
描写立春的诗句past century. However, the US has been abnt from providing international aid to its allies in this crisis as the pandemic has overwhelmed their domestic health care system (Megan, 2020).
Meanwhile, the spread of the Covid-19 pandemic has led to an increa in acts and displays of sinophobia, as well as xenophobia, violence, and racism against people of East Asia, especially China. The Chine government is clearly nervous about the impact of the pandemic its country's image. As China gradually reopen its cities and returns to normal production, the Chine government has started the soft power campaign of providing medical aid to Italy and other countries in need. They are trying to win back their reputation, but on the contrary, this charm offensive has not really changed the image of China. It is unlikely that the West will forget China’s initial attempt to hide the outbreak of Covid-19 under an authoritarian government.
Both Western and Eastern governments are nervous about whether the pandemic will affect their global influence. This is why major powers are using the virus as an “opinion weapon” against their ri
马鞍山旅游景点有哪些vals. An example of this is the Trump administration's initial insistence on identifying Covid-19 as a Chine virus, and blaming China for not warning them early. Likewi, the spokesman for the Chine Foreign Ministry publicly suspects the US army as somehow to blame.
Secondly, the pandemic has devastated the economy of every affected nation, which may further influence the balance between the great powers. The truth is, if governments do not act timely, there will be greater economic and societal disruption, rendering their country slower to recover. The virus has no borders, and it treats
developing and developed countries equally. The US, where the government belatedly responded to the pandemic, is at high risk. To prevent the spread of the virus, many states around the country have to issue stay-at-home orders and the shuttering of business, but the conquences are so rious that the economy is decimated. According to a report in The New York Times (2020), millions of citizens have filed for unemployment becau of restrictions on working, and layoffs. Some of them have begun a ries of demonstrations to urge state governments to reopen the economy (Lee, 2020). The turbulence in US stock markets has recently shown that investors are panicked about the outbreak of Covid-19. This is why the US government is pushing a start to the reopening process as soon as possible, although the county hasn’t recovered fully from the virus. Fortunately, d
eveloped countries like the US still retain the capability to take massive steps to save their economy and prevent disruptions. For example, the US has planned financial relief and unemployment assistance for tho influenced by the lockdown orders (Adamczyk, 2020). In addition, the U.K government decided to pay 80% of salaries for staff who are kept on by their employer, which aimed to reduce unemployment due to the pandemic (BBC News).
In contrast, although China has been the first to recover from the Coronavirus, and reopen its economy, the pandemic has already dealt a heavy blow to the Chine economy. According to data relead by the National Bureau of Statistics of China (2020), GDP in the first quarter of this year fell by 6.8% year-on-year. As the shadow of the Covid-19 has not disperd, China is expected to continue to suffer from the
菠萝蜜的营养价值及功效与作用pandemic. In the short term, China cannot be expected to benefit that much from the global market, since Europe, North America, and other places are still in the grip of the Coronavirus. Moreover, the interests of countries are cloly linked in a global market: “If one power falls behind the other two, it will lo global markets and influence to the benefit of the others. But, paradoxically, if one really collaps, that risks pulling down the others as well” (Sven Biscop, 2020).
Last, but not least, the pandemic has spawned new barriers to globalization. On the one hand, globalization brings benefits. On the other hand, it also brings huge risks. The idea of globalization is not only about transferring goods, but also moving people. Many nations decided to clo their national borders and impod travel bans to help prevent the spread of Covid-19. For example, the State Department issued a Level 4 “do not travel” advisory on March 19, whic h prohibited citizens to travel internationally. Soon after, the EU instituted a 30-day ban on non-esntial travel (Salcedo, Yar, & Cherelus, 2020).昨日重现歌词>腰花怎么做
帕丁顿熊观后感
Meanwhile, the pandemic has highlighted the risks inherent in over-reliance on global supply chains, prompting the re-nationalization of supply chains. According to a report from the U.S Drug and Food Administration (2009), only 28% of manufacturers of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) were bad in the same country as their company headquarters. Similarly, ventilators and medical masks are part of a supply shortage as the supply of medical equipment depends heavily on China. As the virus spreads, governments around the world are restricting the export of protective equipment, even to friendly nations (Bradsher & Alderman, 2020). The
disruption of the global supply chain has not only affected the pharmaceutical industry, but also other manufacturing industries. Most of the automotive industry in the UK has been shut down as most of t
he parts produced overas have been discontinued due to the pandemic (BBC News). In other words, the pandemic reinforced nationalist arguments for native manufacturing and more limited migration, which ems to accelerate the demi of globalization.
笔记本有杂音In summary, the pandemic will negatively affect international relations becau it has changed the balance of power, including their global influences and economic power. Into the future, the pandemic may lead to the undoing of globalization. In my opinion, although the pandemic has had such an impact on global relations, the relations will not change drastically. Deep economic interdependence will remain, and it ems to be a beneficial chance for the world in one way, strengthening global governance in areas such as health.
